Libel costs Mirror £15k damages, £380k in costs


by Unity    
February 2, 2010 at 3:28 pm

Reports of this kind seem fairly commonplace in today’s media:

Model Matt Peacock yesterday accepted £15,000 in damages from the Sunday Mirror over an article that claimed he was violent towards his ex-wife, Jodie Marsh.

The piece, which appeared in its Celebs on Sunday magazine on 13 April last year, claimed the couple’s relationship ended soon afterwards as a result of his violence.

It’s just your bog standard ‘newspaper prints minor celeb gossip and gets nailed for inconsequential sum in damages’ that seems to crop up every few weeks with banal regularity.

The Mirror, of course, also had to pick up the tab for costs, the exact figure for which is rarely disclosed… unless Private Eye get in on the act.

According to sources on Twitter, this week’s copy of the Eye reveals that he got £15,000 in damages after being wrongly accused of being a wife-beater, a law firm who’s name we all know very well – Carter Ruck – got £380,000 in legal costs out of this one case.

Difficult as it is to have much sympathy for the Mirror here, there is something desperately wrong with a system in which the lawyers are making just over 25 times as much out of a lawsuit than the injured party.


---------------------------
     


About the author
'Unity' is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He also blogs at Ministry of Truth.
· Other posts by
Filed under
News


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


“Difficult as it is to have much sympathy for the Mirror here, there is something desperately wrong with a system in which the lawyers are making just over 25 times as much out of a lawsuit than the injured party.”

It’s not simply a case of Lawyers ‘R’ Us get £380k while the aggrieved party gets a lots less.

Assuming that £380k is the total sum agreed in costs, there are various items that the lawyers will have to pay in order to deal with a case, e.g. court fees, VAT, staff overheads, etc.

Of course, I won’t dispute the fact that costs in libel cases are generally excessive, there’s just more than there appears at first glance.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Libel costs Mirror £15k damages, £380k in costs http://bit.ly/b2u2k4

  2. Patrick Gower

    RT @libcon: Libel costs Mirror £15k damages, £380k in costs http://bit.ly/b2u2k4

  3. Douglas Gresham

    Follow-up on my libel post yesterday – Mirror case supposedly cost 15k for the award and 380k in fees http://bit.ly/asNPgz

  4. Douglas Gresham

    Follow-up on my libel post yesterday – Mirror case supposedly cost 15k for the award and 380k in fees http://bit.ly/asNPgz

  5. Chris Coltrane

    It's hard to sympathise with tabloids. Still, this is a perfect example of why libel reform is vital http://bit.ly/dBGfRI

  6. Dez

    RT@chris_coltrane It's hard to sympathise with tabloids. Still, this is a perfect example of why libel reform is vital http://bit.ly/dBGfRI

  7. George Allwell

    Liberal Conspiracy » Libel costs Mirror £15k damages, £380k in costs http://bit.ly/b2u2k4





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




94 Comments



15 Comments



17 Comments



26 Comments



42 Comments



21 Comments



13 Comments



51 Comments



11 Comments



78 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» rentergirl posted on Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation?

» Sally posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot"

» Spike1138 posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish

» Sally posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish

» Raging Reg posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish

» Spike1138 posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot"

» Dave Semple posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish

» damon posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish

» Spike1138 posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot"

» Spike1138 posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish

» Spike1138 posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish

» Cherub posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot"

» Flowerpower posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish

» Cherub posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish

» Spike1138 posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish