Cameron re-affirms claims to go green
David Cameron’s office recently wrote this email to a voter in response to the standard Tory grassroots view that Global Warming is a global conspiracy.
I can see that you feel recent allegations have cast doubt over the case for climate change, and the integrity of the science. However, our view is that public policy on climate change has been built over many years, with input from a wide variety of expert sources, and we do need to significantly reduce our carbon emissions.
It is always right to keep an open mind, and question scientific theories. But, those in favour of doing nothing on the basis of scientific scepticism need to show that the risks we run by not acting are small and manageable. Given all the information and evidence we now have, that is a very difficult case to make.
I will, of course, ensure that David is made aware if your concerns, but I am afraid we may have to agree to disagree on this issue.
Whatever your views are, we cannot afford not to go green. The UK economy is still dependent for more than 90 per cent of its energy needs on fossil fuels, which increasingly come from imports. With the era of cheap oil now well and truly over, our fossil fuel dependency is making us uncompetitive and vulnerable to geopolitical shocks.
We can build a secure, prosperous future, but only if we start the work of transforming our national energy infrastructure now, by increasing energy efficiency and reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels.
Being at the cutting edge of new technologies in the energy industry is precisely the action that is needed to prevent the power cuts the Government is predicting by 2017, and it ensures that Britain’s consumers and businesses are protected against the consequences of volatile and rising oil prices into the future.
We need to make the transition to a low carbon economy urgently, and I hope you’ll agree that our plans for a Low Carbon Economy will help create hundreds of thousands of jobs, raise skills and improve Britain’s competitiveness.
The answer will no doubt disappoint many Tories. It’s interesting however to note that Cameron’s office uses the ‘energy security’ argument to make their case rather than a more traditional Tory approach that may appeal to conserving local environments.
In the US, Democrat Senator John Kerry and President Obama have repeatedly stated that energy security makes investment in renewable energy a top priority.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Story Filed Under: News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
In Leeds, the Conservatives were the only group who voted against a committment to reduce carbon emissions in the area by 40% by 2020. Vote Blue – Go Green? I don’t think so….
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Philip Challinor
RT @libcon Cameron re-affirms claims to go green http://bit.ly/cIVIzT Let's just hope it isn't a cast-iron promise.
- ECS
Liberal Conspiracy » Cameron re-affirms claims to go green http://bit.ly/aKg1Qm
- Political Scandals
Cameron re-affirms claims to go green http://t.love.com/294742485
- Joy L.
Liberal Conspiracy » Cameron re-affirms claims to go green http://bit.ly/cDRfO7
- Liberal Conspiracy
Cameron re-affirms claims to go green http://bit.ly/cIVIzT
- ECS
Liberal Conspiracy » Cameron re-affirms claims to go green http://bit.ly/aKg1Qm
- Best of the web 25/01/10 – 31/01/10 | www.the-vibe.co.uk
[...] Cameron re-affirms claims to go green [...]
- uberVU - social comments
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by libcon: Cameron re-affirms claims to go green http://bit.ly/cIVIzT...
- Tweets that mention Liberal Conspiracy » Cameron re-affirms claims to go green -- Topsy.com
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal Conspiracy, Political Scandals, Philip Challinor, Joy L., ECS and others. ECS said: Liberal Conspiracy » Cameron re-affirms claims to go green http://bit.ly/aKg1Qm [...]
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
28 Comments 72 Comments 21 Comments 48 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 22 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » So Much For Subtlety posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Jack C posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » bluepillnation posted on The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think » P Ve M posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » BenSix posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » BenSix posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? |










