Tory Troll blogger Adam Bienkov reports:
Boris Johnson today denied that he will reduce the number of police officers in London, despite proposing to do just that last week.
The Mayor’s budget consultation unequivocally states that:
Over the three years to 2012-13, the number of Police Officers is forecast to decrease by 455, while PCSOs remain the same and Special Constables increase by 2,690.
Yet when Liberal Democrat Assembly Member Dee Doocey, put this to him today he told her that she was “completely wrong.”
The London and national press has yet to pick up on the story – perhaps unwilling to believe a Mayor who promised to increase the number of police officers would do the exact opposite.
Adam ends by saying:
When Gordon Brown suggested that Boris would cut the police budget and police numbers, Boris accused him of misleading the house.
In reality Boris has now done both.
Sounds like the flip-flopping Mayor is carrying on as normal.
| Post to del.icio.us |
RT @libcon: :: Boris removes hundreds of police officers http://bit.ly/8mmfoA ~ this link should work http://bit.ly/4qs1nG
Liberal Conspiracy » Boris to remove hundreds of police officers http://bit.ly/4qs1nG
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jules Lewis, Garry Dent. Garry Dent said: Liberal Conspiracy » Boris to remove hundreds of police officers http://bit.ly/4qs1nG [...]
[...] are reaching the blogosphere but mysteriously enough not the mainstream media, that Mayor of London Boris Johnson is up to his [...]
Where are they going to get the extra Special constables from, and why increase them so much whilst decreasing full time police?
Interesting to note how Boris expects to increase the Specials by 2,690.
Well, I find it interesting. Specials are a) volunteers and b) in bloody short supply across the UK. Where does he expect to get an additional 2,690 people in London who want to work for free during the shit shifts of Friday and Saturday night?
I doubt very much if Boris has this in mind, but I’d support disciplining policemen who cover up their identifying insignia so that they can beat up demonstrators with impunity, and for sacking senior staff who have failed to tackle and may even have encouraged this behaviour, along with the use of agents provocateur to “justify” heavy-handed policing.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
| 7 Comments 18 Comments 15 Comments 19 Comments 9 Comments 26 Comments 56 Comments 67 Comments 2 Comments 47 Comments | LATEST COMMENTS » Lee Griffin posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Bob B posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Cable’s Time Is Now « The Blog posted on Poll: voters don't rate Osborne » Jailhouselawyer posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Lee Griffin posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Lee Griffin posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Left Outside posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Gwyn posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Lee Griffin posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Lee Griffin posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Gwyn posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Gwyn posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Alex posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Shuggy posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Gwyn posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election Last 50 // Comments feed |