What is alarming is that someone like Berlusconi attracts far more support than the the social democrats in Italy. Sunny H has said that Labour in the UK needs to attact the support of small businesses. In taly there are many small family run businesses which appear to favour Berlusconi over the social democrats. I cannot see how support for Berlusconi’s attacker is going to persuade small businesses to suport the left.

There are plenty of people ‘on the right’ who deplore what happened to protesters at the G20 Summit and feel the police are politically motivated (ie Labour politicos).

Just thought I’d be balanced.

Do you really know what goes on in italian late evening so called news / reportive programs ?
Never mind Santoro – what about the rest ?

Do you realize that this is no longer gaffes by Mr B, nor just another italian mess ?

Something horrible is going on, has been going on – and will soon turn very ugly.

Bernstein and Woodward had it easy if compared to what Marco Travaglio is doing in Italy. And Travaglio does not even need to do investigative journalism.

All he does is check up on written court proceedings / sentences, synthesize them for the understanding of the average italian and explain them as they are.

In the UK, he would be labeled as a standard journalist.
In Italy – he is being labeled as a criminal.

Journalists and comentators worldwide should spend less time on Berlusconi trivia, and take some time to write about the few in Italy who are doing their part to open the eyes of an already blinded-by-tv-propaganda population.
And not once a year, or once a month. Every Day.

P2, stands for Propaganda 2, – in Italy today, there is propaganda everywhere.

Its like writing about the colonialism problems in India 60 years ago – completely ignoring Gandhi.

What point is there – in explaining in almost anything ever published about Berlusconi, that he has control of the italian media without offering daily, hourly examples of what really does happen in italian media ?

And it happens every day in italy. Big brother in your face, lying without shame.

Wake up !

Keyzer Soze

Have you joined the 50,000 slavering supporters on Massimo Tartaglia’s Facebook page?
I understand this cathedral-wielding loner managed to convince himself (as well as thousands of others) that Berlusconi was just ‘asking for it’.

Or are you working on your OWN list of British politicos who might benefit from the ‘cathedral’ treatment – after all there is no reason why we cannot attain a similar standard of political discourse as our volatile Italian neighbours, is there?

Brownshirts love to play the victim, and use it as a way to take away peoples freedoms.

And let’s go further. If we approve of this act of violence on a (corrupt, contemptible) rightwinger, which violent acts do we disapprove of? Throwing a heavy object into someone’s face is pretty horrific.

Tartaglia is -apparently- a mentally ill man. Berlusconi is a corrupt and contemptible politician. One of them should be given treatment for his problems. The other should be voted out of power and brought before a court (and not, this time, permitted to wriggle out of his trial).

What we shouldn’t do is applaud this infantile piece of violence.

Political violence in a democracy- which Italy still more or less is, despite Berlusconi’s media manipulation is foul. It empowers those who advocate repression. It encourages more violence, which is the road to fascism. And it has an awfully good chance of killing people, including the most innocent of bystanders.

Not to insult Claude or anyone else of Italian background, but Italy has some dreadful recent experiences with political violence, from both right and left, and we don’t want to go back there.

When nation states invade other countries, killing many innocent civilians, that’s not “political violence”, but “necessary war” to fight “worse evils”.

When – as Claude has poitned out in the past – the Italian state licenses vigilantism fuelled by extreme right, virtually-fascist organisations, which target ethnic minorities, that’s not “political violence”.

But when one, extremely corrupt, disreputable, misogynistic, lying, cheating, far-right loon gets hit in the face – oh suddenly we have “political violence” which is oh-so reprehensible and pious noises need to be uttered and tut-tutting issued at those who realise that not only did this particular quasi-fascist have it coming, but that political violence is, well, the foundation of all politics. The only difference is who it gets done to and by whom. This time around, the direction of fit was uncharacteristically reversed.

People’s inabiltiy to deal with that is testament only to a naivety about the nature of politics and a bizarrely schizophrenic perspective on the presence of force in political socieites.

“They say that agents’ individual actions don’t matter when seen against power structures ” – The hokey old folk wisdom of the old country, if the peasants were all Marxist academics..

LC contributors are divided (broadly speaking) into two camps, and it is THEIR REACTION to the assault, rather than the assault itself, driving recent comments.

Dark humour, or, tacit support of violent methods of protest?

I asked if the reaction would have been quite the same had an unpopular FEMALE leader had her nose or teeth broken – only to be accused by one poster of being a tory ‘hypocrite’ (a prime example of missing the point, surely).

I’m with Claude – I suspect it will be the indefatigable playboy who will end up having the last, and longest laugh?

This post was mentioned on Twitter by libcon: :: Italy begins crackdown on free speech http://bit.ly/4BMzTs...

In fairness to Claud, he was one of the few anti-Berlisconi voices NOT rejoicing yesterday.

I was half-expecting him to say ‘It’s all fun and games until someone loses an eye!’ like a safety-obssessed kill-joy.

He was right though.

In general, there is a problem with political violence, especially within democracies. It fails to achieve the aim, as it gives legitimacy to the non-violent. If the non-violent are oppresive, it also gives them the ability to supress the violents’ point of view. This would appear to be a case in point. Not quite as good an example as assisinating the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, but a case a point.

Interestingly though, the writer does not condemn the violent act, just the reactions. It might be the lack of thought implied by this judgement that is the problem here, for if people were cheering the anti-Burlesconi sentiment but refusing to condone a crime (I assume it is illegal to assualt people with a model place of worship in Italy) what would the unpleasant reactionaries have to attack with?

A salutary reminder that there really was something to be said for the practice of hanging politicians upside down from a petrol station…

Kinda makes you nostalgic….

A model cathedral, for crying out loud.