<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mad Mel&#8217;s list of sceptical &#8216;climate-related scientists&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:39:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Charles S</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-261854</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Charles S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 04:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-261854</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@LandscapeMan @EWGardens http://bit.ly/hCbVSW 11:44 in&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@LandscapeMan @EWGardens <a href="http://bit.ly/hCbVSW" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/hCbVSW</a> 11:44 in</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hartley-Revolve</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-112329</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hartley-Revolve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-112329</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @DuncanStott: To everyone saying Alan Titchmarsh isn&#039;t substantial: he&#039;s actually a distinguished climate scientist! http://bit.ly/b2OzCt&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @DuncanStott: To everyone saying Alan Titchmarsh isn&#39;t substantial: he&#39;s actually a distinguished climate scientist! <a href="http://bit.ly/b2OzCt" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/b2OzCt</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Stott</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-112293</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-112293</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;To everyone saying Alan Titchmarsh isn&#039;t substantial: he&#039;s actually a distinguished climate scientist! http://bit.ly/b2OzCt&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">To everyone saying Alan Titchmarsh isn&#39;t substantial: he&#39;s actually a distinguished climate scientist! <a href="http://bit.ly/b2OzCt" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/b2OzCt</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class, narratives and Jim Inhofe on climate change &#171; Though Cowards Flinch</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-91752</link>
		<dc:creator>Class, narratives and Jim Inhofe on climate change &#171; Though Cowards Flinch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-91752</guid>
		<description>[...] very small minority of scientists disagree, though many of these have nothing to do with climate-change disciplines. Vociferous members of the commentariat also disagree &#8211; no one is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] very small minority of scientists disagree, though many of these have nothing to do with climate-change disciplines. Vociferous members of the commentariat also disagree &#8211; no one is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maya kalev</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-90413</link>
		<dc:creator>maya kalev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-90413</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Liberal Conspiracy » Mad Mel’s list of sceptical ‘climate-related scientists’ http://bit.ly/85AHy8&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Liberal Conspiracy » Mad Mel’s list of sceptical ‘climate-related scientists’ <a href="http://bit.ly/85AHy8" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/85AHy8</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damon</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-90111</link>
		<dc:creator>damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-90111</guid>
		<description>I would certainly be skeptical about neo-con opinion on climate change too. Very much so. I tried reading a couple of books, but the science got too heavy. It seems you have to know everything about the earth and the solar system and how everything reacts with &lt;I&gt;everything&lt;/I&gt; else, that it all gets too complicated.
But my skeptism is more about what we should do about it, and the individual led anti-consumer &#039;&#039;politics&#039;&#039; that is put out to promote being concerned about your &lt;B&gt;personal&lt;/B&gt; carbon footprint.
And so, another thread on this website is titled &#039;&#039;Concern about climate change ‘highest ever’ &#039;&#039;.
Most people understand this stuff like they understand the Lisbon Treaty on Europe.

I&#039;m in an all night internert cafe in Kuala Lumpur right know. 50 brand new Samsung computors and the air conditioning on 24/7 so cold that I have to wear my jacket when I&#039;m in here. It fills up with young people playing the very latest computor games and drinking soft drinks from the fridge.
Outside many businesses and street cafes are open 24 hours too. There is a 24 hour 7-11 shop on nearly ever corner, and everything comes in disposable bottles and packaging. In my hotel I had to ask them to turn the air conditioner down as it was too cold. 
Same on some on the buses or in the cinema. You walk about in light clothing because its hot outside, then inside it&#039;s too cold.
Maybe George Monbiot needs to come over and lecture them.

So my skepticism is more, that back in England when you hear some event like the Glastonbury festival, going on about how they are using &#039;&#039;locally sourced&#039;&#039; cooking fat to power some of their generators and biodegradable tent pegs and such, when it makes no difference what so ever. It&#039;s just boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would certainly be skeptical about neo-con opinion on climate change too. Very much so. I tried reading a couple of books, but the science got too heavy. It seems you have to know everything about the earth and the solar system and how everything reacts with <i>everything</i> else, that it all gets too complicated.<br />
But my skeptism is more about what we should do about it, and the individual led anti-consumer &#8221;politics&#8221; that is put out to promote being concerned about your <b>personal</b> carbon footprint.<br />
And so, another thread on this website is titled &#8221;Concern about climate change ‘highest ever’ &#8221;.<br />
Most people understand this stuff like they understand the Lisbon Treaty on Europe.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in an all night internert cafe in Kuala Lumpur right know. 50 brand new Samsung computors and the air conditioning on 24/7 so cold that I have to wear my jacket when I&#8217;m in here. It fills up with young people playing the very latest computor games and drinking soft drinks from the fridge.<br />
Outside many businesses and street cafes are open 24 hours too. There is a 24 hour 7-11 shop on nearly ever corner, and everything comes in disposable bottles and packaging. In my hotel I had to ask them to turn the air conditioner down as it was too cold.<br />
Same on some on the buses or in the cinema. You walk about in light clothing because its hot outside, then inside it&#8217;s too cold.<br />
Maybe George Monbiot needs to come over and lecture them.</p>
<p>So my skepticism is more, that back in England when you hear some event like the Glastonbury festival, going on about how they are using &#8221;locally sourced&#8221; cooking fat to power some of their generators and biodegradable tent pegs and such, when it makes no difference what so ever. It&#8217;s just boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planeshift</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-90035</link>
		<dc:creator>Planeshift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-90035</guid>
		<description>&quot; I too am skeptical about climate change, because I’m not an expert. Just like I am skeptical about a lot of things. NATO’s invasion plans for Iraq and Afghanistan left me feeling skeptical, as were plans for surges in troop numbers in those countries.&quot;

Except the architechts of the Iraq and Afghansitan wars have also been very influential in the &quot;climate change sceptism&quot; camp. The neo-cons and the corporations that support them are exactly the ones who have spent decades and billions of dollars in promoting the &quot;do nothing, its all made up&quot; view on GW. So logically your skepticism about the figures in the bush administration should cause you to be skeptical of their views on AGW.

BTW - I too am skeptical about chest infections, because I am not an expert. So when I had a bad chest, I decided that rather than consult several doctors and do something about it, I&#039;d consult the internet - who told me chest infections were a lie dreamed up by governments looking for an excuse to tax me.

I am now dead. Good job Hell has wi fi eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; I too am skeptical about climate change, because I’m not an expert. Just like I am skeptical about a lot of things. NATO’s invasion plans for Iraq and Afghanistan left me feeling skeptical, as were plans for surges in troop numbers in those countries.&#8221;</p>
<p>Except the architechts of the Iraq and Afghansitan wars have also been very influential in the &#8220;climate change sceptism&#8221; camp. The neo-cons and the corporations that support them are exactly the ones who have spent decades and billions of dollars in promoting the &#8220;do nothing, its all made up&#8221; view on GW. So logically your skepticism about the figures in the bush administration should cause you to be skeptical of their views on AGW.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; I too am skeptical about chest infections, because I am not an expert. So when I had a bad chest, I decided that rather than consult several doctors and do something about it, I&#8217;d consult the internet &#8211; who told me chest infections were a lie dreamed up by governments looking for an excuse to tax me.</p>
<p>I am now dead. Good job Hell has wi fi eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damon</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89992</link>
		<dc:creator>damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89992</guid>
		<description>DG @ 23, I liked that link you did. That&#039;s how I feel. I too am skeptical about climate change, because I&#039;m not an expert. Just like I am skeptical about a lot of things. NATO&#039;s invasion plans for Iraq and Afghanistan left me feeling skeptical, as were plans for surges in troop numbers in those countries.
I hope everyone was skepital about Paul Bremer and Donald Rumsfeld from day one.

George Monbiot is a real turn off for me.

&lt;I&gt;&#039;&#039;Clive James isn&#039;t a climate change sceptic, he&#039;s a sucker - but this may be the reason.
My fiercest opponents on global warming tend to be in their 60s and 70s. This offers a fascinating, if chilling, insight into human psychology&#039;&#039;&lt;/I&gt;
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/02/climate-change-denial-clive-james</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DG @ 23, I liked that link you did. That&#8217;s how I feel. I too am skeptical about climate change, because I&#8217;m not an expert. Just like I am skeptical about a lot of things. NATO&#8217;s invasion plans for Iraq and Afghanistan left me feeling skeptical, as were plans for surges in troop numbers in those countries.<br />
I hope everyone was skepital about Paul Bremer and Donald Rumsfeld from day one.</p>
<p>George Monbiot is a real turn off for me.</p>
<p><i>&#8221;Clive James isn&#8217;t a climate change sceptic, he&#8217;s a sucker &#8211; but this may be the reason.<br />
My fiercest opponents on global warming tend to be in their 60s and 70s. This offers a fascinating, if chilling, insight into human psychology&#8221;</i><br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/02/climate-change-denial-clive-james" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/02/climate-change-denial-clive-james</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kojak</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89917</link>
		<dc:creator>Kojak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89917</guid>
		<description>21 + 22 + 23,

And just when I am being accused of being obsessed with Melanie Phillips up pops yet another Liberal Conspiracy article linking to her articles:

http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/09/class-war-quiz/

It would be funny if it wasn&#039;t so sad. 

How come you don&#039;t single out Peter Hitchens? Isn&#039;t he scary enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21 + 22 + 23,</p>
<p>And just when I am being accused of being obsessed with Melanie Phillips up pops yet another Liberal Conspiracy article linking to her articles:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/09/class-war-quiz/" rel="nofollow">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/09/class-war-quiz/</a></p>
<p>It would be funny if it wasn&#8217;t so sad. </p>
<p>How come you don&#8217;t single out Peter Hitchens? Isn&#8217;t he scary enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89893</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89893</guid>
		<description>You do seem somewhat obsessed with Mel. And can I point you to a good argument as to precisely why we shouldn&#039;t ignore the climate change sceptics. 

http://www.the-vibe.co.uk/2009/12/08/bensnook/what-the-climate-scientists-arent-telling-us-never-trust-a-scientist/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do seem somewhat obsessed with Mel. And can I point you to a good argument as to precisely why we shouldn&#8217;t ignore the climate change sceptics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.the-vibe.co.uk/2009/12/08/bensnook/what-the-climate-scientists-arent-telling-us-never-trust-a-scientist/" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-vibe.co.uk/2009/12/08/bensnook/what-the-climate-scientists-arent-telling-us-never-trust-a-scientist/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Booth</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89851</link>
		<dc:creator>John Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89851</guid>
		<description>Careful, Left Outside: doing such things as actually looking at the facts before declaring fatwas on the left might blow Kojak&#039;s very vulnerable mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful, Left Outside: doing such things as actually looking at the facts before declaring fatwas on the left might blow Kojak&#8217;s very vulnerable mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left Outside</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89824</link>
		<dc:creator>Left Outside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89824</guid>
		<description>Kojak, I&#039;ve provided the link, all you have to do is open each post press ctrl+f &quot;mel&quot; and ignore any references to Homelessness or Melanin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kojak, I&#8217;ve provided the link, all you have to do is open each post press ctrl+f &#8220;mel&#8221; and ignore any references to Homelessness or Melanin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89812</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89812</guid>
		<description>Google suggests that ~2% of LibCon pages mention Melanie Phillips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google suggests that ~2% of LibCon pages mention Melanie Phillips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kojak</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89806</link>
		<dc:creator>Kojak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89806</guid>
		<description>Left Outside re: Comment 16,

Kind of you to cut and paste and highlght the named topics.

&quot;Perhaps one of two more might mention her but it’s hardly worth your time coming here saying “leave her alone!” “you’re obsessed!”.&quot;

&#039;One or two&#039; is an underestimate on a grand scale - worthy of a UEA email.
As you appear to have the time to identify the named posts could you go through all the others to see how often her name is mentioned - that way you will see where the obsession resides ......... here at Liberal Conspiracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Left Outside re: Comment 16,</p>
<p>Kind of you to cut and paste and highlght the named topics.</p>
<p>&#8220;Perhaps one of two more might mention her but it’s hardly worth your time coming here saying “leave her alone!” “you’re obsessed!”.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8216;One or two&#8217; is an underestimate on a grand scale &#8211; worthy of a UEA email.<br />
As you appear to have the time to identify the named posts could you go through all the others to see how often her name is mentioned &#8211; that way you will see where the obsession resides &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; here at Liberal Conspiracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frolix22</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89782</link>
		<dc:creator>frolix22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89782</guid>
		<description>Alan Titchmarsh? That nice, gentle... gardener?

Honestly, just when you think these people cannot get any more desperate and ridiculous. That is hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Titchmarsh? That nice, gentle&#8230; gardener?</p>
<p>Honestly, just when you think these people cannot get any more desperate and ridiculous. That is hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left Outside</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89759</link>
		<dc:creator>Left Outside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89759</guid>
		<description>Now I&#039;ve cluttered this thread up nicely I would like to say I agree with Derek Wall, but I think carbon credit trading are the least worst, most possible alternative.

I&#039;m far less pleased than &lt;a href=&quot;http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/07/unhelpful-hansen/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Krugman&lt;/a&gt; is but it is at least a start. 

A Carbon tax would be lovely, but I think its unlikely to get everyone involved and there is already a catch-all anti-tax lobby even larger than the anti-AGW lobby which I&#039;m not sure we have time and resources to tackle too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I&#8217;ve cluttered this thread up nicely I would like to say I agree with Derek Wall, but I think carbon credit trading are the least worst, most possible alternative.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m far less pleased than <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/07/unhelpful-hansen/" rel="nofollow">Krugman</a> is but it is at least a start. </p>
<p>A Carbon tax would be lovely, but I think its unlikely to get everyone involved and there is already a catch-all anti-tax lobby even larger than the anti-AGW lobby which I&#8217;m not sure we have time and resources to tackle too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left Outside</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89757</link>
		<dc:creator>Left Outside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89757</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/archives/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Number of posts in November: 160&lt;/a&gt;

Number about Melanie Philips: 2 

Perhaps one of two more might mention her but it&#039;s hardly worth your time coming here saying &quot;leave her alone!&quot; &quot;you&#039;re obsessed!&quot;.

Sir, I put it to you, that you are, in fact, the one who is obsessed.

    * Policy Exchange: You win some, you lose some...
    * Policy Exchange win libel case?
    * Observer repeating right-wing spin on inheritance tax
    * Poll: what young people think about politics
    * Against the ban on minarets
    * Needing real Labour: Skelmersdale
    * Chilcot and the &#039;smoking gun&#039;
    * Does taxing the rich work?
    * YouGov: voters not convinced by Tories
    * The divine mission of UKIP&#039;s new leader
    * They haven’t run a piss-up in a brewery
    * The Truth about Immigration: Asylum (Part 2)
    * Why I don&#039;t believe in faith schools
    * ResPublica? You’re having a laugh
    * Which Taxpayers&#039; Alliance should you join?
    * Borders goes into administration
    * The Truth about Immigration: Asylum (part 1)
    * The vision thing
    * Chilcot inquiry: shoot first, ask questions later
    * Reporting back from the Citizens&#039; Assembly
    * A gram is better than a damn
    * Citizens&#039; response to the economic crisis
    * How to help the homeless
    * Cameron: More to be done on workplace bullying
    * 30th anniversary of attack on Islam&#039;s holiest site
    * Do not fear a crooked shadow
    * Compass launch &#039;In Place of Cuts&#039; Report
    * Laws matter; politicians don&#039;t
    * Normal Service will be resumed shortly...
    * The Truth about Immigration - The migrants you don&#039;t hear about in the tabloids
    * The Truth about Immigration: Introduction/Key Concepts
    * We only want the earth! Land rights and conflict
    * Jean Charles de Menezes: price of a life
    * I won’t vote for any MP who supports Mandelson’s Digital Economy Bill
    * How New Labour ignored the focus groups
    * More calls for windfall tax on banks
    * Britain&#039;s first green city
    * Climate change and Cumbria&#039;s floods
    * How to commit a global warming fraud
    * Climate change conspiracies debunked
    * Tories: filling in forms will strengthen the family
    * Doctors and nurses
    * The Left, the Right and Advertising
    * Only 25% Republicans think Obama election legit
    * The end of the free internet in Britain?
    * Blair&#039;s failure at EU illustrates its real nature
    * A worker&#039;s wage for MPs?
    * Watch: Ed Balls makes Gove look like a fool
    * Mandelson&#039;s Copyright Death Star exposed
    * The Truth about Immigration
    * The break-up of Bosnia
    * Fighters and Believers
    * The PCC still want to regulate blogs (the Baroness responds)
    * The Queen&#039;s speech: political ventriloquism
    * Atheist Bus launches new ad campaign
    * Tory MEP hosts &#039;climate sceptics&#039; conference
    * A Straight White Men&#039;s Officer at SOAS..?
    * These are The Tories at Ground Zero
    * UK Twitterers more left &amp; liberal than average
    * Blogging and PCC Regulation - A Collective Response
    * Labour PPCs sign letter calling for reform
    * Watch: Fox News pushes global warming denialism
    * PCC in crisis as Rusbridger resigns
    * God&#039;s work: Goldman Sachs vs Church of England
    * Getting Labour&#039;s prison record wrong
    * The new PCC chair will let journalism down too
    * Maybe that’s what grown-ups do
    * Daily Mail-o-matic updated
    * The Right&#039;s confusion on challenging the BNP
    * They&#039;ve banned Christmas! Sort of!
    * Charity calls for aid link with child goals
    * Tory rebel: I&#039;m not sexist but these women...
    * The Sun does cyber-stalking too
    * Lamenting 40 years of The Sun
    * Poles Apart: coming near you
    * Launch: What is radical politics today?
    * Stewart responds to Fox News lies
    * Can Greeks lead the way for the left?
    * Ex-Soldier facing jail for handing in shotgun
    * The real story from Glasgow North East
    * What is the future of social democracy?
    * Religion and politics at work: how much slack?
    * New call to overhaul entire financial sector
    * Which planet do Spectator writers inhabit?
    * Revealed: How Tory staffers are astro-turfing leftwing blogs
    * We need a million affordable homes
    * No EU Cash for Griffin
    * Plan to help victims of domestic violence greeted
    * Financial solutions to the financial crisis
    * Fox News caught in new fake footage scandal
    * What has the EU ever done for us?
    * Britons want: to reform, regulate and redistribute
    * Cameron&#039;s speech fails the poverty fact-check
    * Dorries issues &#039;apology&#039; to Labour MP Devine
    * The DNA Database fudge continues
    * Poll: most voters think Sun attack back-fired
    * Mutiny at Spectator against wingnuttery?
    * Dan Hannan slams NHS in new video for Ron Paul
    * Pinochet and Polanski: even old men should face their past
    * Did the fall of the Berlin Wall kill ideology?
    * Anti-Christmas nonsense arrives earlier every year
    * Sun faces backlash on campaign against Brown
    * Quarter of UK MEPs deny global warming too
    * Reforming English Libel Law
    * Pants off to impropriety
    * Julie Bindel does transphobia again
&lt;strong&gt;    * Melanie Phillips explains Gramsci&lt;/strong&gt;
    * Why New Labour should pick a fight with The Sun
    * Tory Michael Gove offers support for controversial school programme
    * TPA condemn firefighters for saving trapped duck
    * Watch: Murdoch wants to block Google (interview)
    * Atlantic Bridge: Is this really a non-partisan charity?
    * Telegraph omits links of leaders attacking Miliband
    * Tony Benn and the Tories: don’t go there
    * But will do the Met police do something?
    * Where is the left&#039;s new economic map?
    * Times condemns French, not Osborne for &#039;autistic&#039;
    * A war-criminal comes to London
    * Population growth: Are you pro-cancer?
    * Power 2010: Will it work?
    * Immigration and next-door neighbours
    * Offensive Language?
    * Have we no shame?
    * Why EU President Blair isn&#039;t a bad idea
    * BBC admits excessively plugging TPA
    * Rally to support Prof. Nutt tomorrow
    * Confessions of a leftwing Islamophobe
    * Is this the only solution to Afghanistan?
    * Loony Trots on Mars
    * Let&#039;s talk about sex
    * Cameron&#039;s Lithuanian ally: Children need protection from &#039;evil&#039; of homosexuality
    * Daniel Hannan: building a base for proto-Poujadism
    * Killing Iraqis with Dowsing Rods
    * Bradshaw&#039;s support for electoral reform welcome
    * Will D. Miliband lead European foreign policy?
    * Power 2010 attacks party leaders on reform
    * This fracture is of David Cameron&#039;s making
    * Has @NadineDorriesMP blocked you on Twitter?
    * A Whiff of the Branding Iron
&lt;strong&gt;    * The continuing madness of Melanie Phillips&lt;/strong&gt;
    * Who pays for Primark&#039;s high profits?
    * Sun angry over &#039;puppy fiend&#039;; story untrue
    * Fabian &#039;Global Change We Need&#039; conf. Saturday
    * Why are these EU-haters so silent?
    * Will Tories delay Human Rights Act repeal?
    * The left and the Berlin Wall
    * The real questions we should ask Mr Hague over Europe
    * Twitter related changes on libcon
    * Be scared, be very scared
    * Tory bloggers offer cover to Cameron on EU
    * Mail finally deletes comments hailing death
    * Tory MP: politicians treated like Jews by Nazis
    * David Nutt controversy: a warning to all you reefer kids out there
    * ConHome threatens civil war with Cameron over EU
    * Pics: Halloween protest on &#039;Zombie Parliament&#039;
    * Parliament to hold first gay wedding
    * MacShane attacks William Hague with 10 questions
    * How Goldman Sachs saw house crash coming
    * Dorries gives second daughter job at office
    * Prof. Nutt: Death by a bar chart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/archives/" rel="nofollow">Number of posts in November: 160</a></p>
<p>Number about Melanie Philips: 2 </p>
<p>Perhaps one of two more might mention her but it&#8217;s hardly worth your time coming here saying &#8220;leave her alone!&#8221; &#8220;you&#8217;re obsessed!&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sir, I put it to you, that you are, in fact, the one who is obsessed.</p>
<p>    * Policy Exchange: You win some, you lose some&#8230;<br />
    * Policy Exchange win libel case?<br />
    * Observer repeating right-wing spin on inheritance tax<br />
    * Poll: what young people think about politics<br />
    * Against the ban on minarets<br />
    * Needing real Labour: Skelmersdale<br />
    * Chilcot and the &#8216;smoking gun&#8217;<br />
    * Does taxing the rich work?<br />
    * YouGov: voters not convinced by Tories<br />
    * The divine mission of UKIP&#8217;s new leader<br />
    * They haven’t run a piss-up in a brewery<br />
    * The Truth about Immigration: Asylum (Part 2)<br />
    * Why I don&#8217;t believe in faith schools<br />
    * ResPublica? You’re having a laugh<br />
    * Which Taxpayers&#8217; Alliance should you join?<br />
    * Borders goes into administration<br />
    * The Truth about Immigration: Asylum (part 1)<br />
    * The vision thing<br />
    * Chilcot inquiry: shoot first, ask questions later<br />
    * Reporting back from the Citizens&#8217; Assembly<br />
    * A gram is better than a damn<br />
    * Citizens&#8217; response to the economic crisis<br />
    * How to help the homeless<br />
    * Cameron: More to be done on workplace bullying<br />
    * 30th anniversary of attack on Islam&#8217;s holiest site<br />
    * Do not fear a crooked shadow<br />
    * Compass launch &#8216;In Place of Cuts&#8217; Report<br />
    * Laws matter; politicians don&#8217;t<br />
    * Normal Service will be resumed shortly&#8230;<br />
    * The Truth about Immigration &#8211; The migrants you don&#8217;t hear about in the tabloids<br />
    * The Truth about Immigration: Introduction/Key Concepts<br />
    * We only want the earth! Land rights and conflict<br />
    * Jean Charles de Menezes: price of a life<br />
    * I won’t vote for any MP who supports Mandelson’s Digital Economy Bill<br />
    * How New Labour ignored the focus groups<br />
    * More calls for windfall tax on banks<br />
    * Britain&#8217;s first green city<br />
    * Climate change and Cumbria&#8217;s floods<br />
    * How to commit a global warming fraud<br />
    * Climate change conspiracies debunked<br />
    * Tories: filling in forms will strengthen the family<br />
    * Doctors and nurses<br />
    * The Left, the Right and Advertising<br />
    * Only 25% Republicans think Obama election legit<br />
    * The end of the free internet in Britain?<br />
    * Blair&#8217;s failure at EU illustrates its real nature<br />
    * A worker&#8217;s wage for MPs?<br />
    * Watch: Ed Balls makes Gove look like a fool<br />
    * Mandelson&#8217;s Copyright Death Star exposed<br />
    * The Truth about Immigration<br />
    * The break-up of Bosnia<br />
    * Fighters and Believers<br />
    * The PCC still want to regulate blogs (the Baroness responds)<br />
    * The Queen&#8217;s speech: political ventriloquism<br />
    * Atheist Bus launches new ad campaign<br />
    * Tory MEP hosts &#8216;climate sceptics&#8217; conference<br />
    * A Straight White Men&#8217;s Officer at SOAS..?<br />
    * These are The Tories at Ground Zero<br />
    * UK Twitterers more left &amp; liberal than average<br />
    * Blogging and PCC Regulation &#8211; A Collective Response<br />
    * Labour PPCs sign letter calling for reform<br />
    * Watch: Fox News pushes global warming denialism<br />
    * PCC in crisis as Rusbridger resigns<br />
    * God&#8217;s work: Goldman Sachs vs Church of England<br />
    * Getting Labour&#8217;s prison record wrong<br />
    * The new PCC chair will let journalism down too<br />
    * Maybe that’s what grown-ups do<br />
    * Daily Mail-o-matic updated<br />
    * The Right&#8217;s confusion on challenging the BNP<br />
    * They&#8217;ve banned Christmas! Sort of!<br />
    * Charity calls for aid link with child goals<br />
    * Tory rebel: I&#8217;m not sexist but these women&#8230;<br />
    * The Sun does cyber-stalking too<br />
    * Lamenting 40 years of The Sun<br />
    * Poles Apart: coming near you<br />
    * Launch: What is radical politics today?<br />
    * Stewart responds to Fox News lies<br />
    * Can Greeks lead the way for the left?<br />
    * Ex-Soldier facing jail for handing in shotgun<br />
    * The real story from Glasgow North East<br />
    * What is the future of social democracy?<br />
    * Religion and politics at work: how much slack?<br />
    * New call to overhaul entire financial sector<br />
    * Which planet do Spectator writers inhabit?<br />
    * Revealed: How Tory staffers are astro-turfing leftwing blogs<br />
    * We need a million affordable homes<br />
    * No EU Cash for Griffin<br />
    * Plan to help victims of domestic violence greeted<br />
    * Financial solutions to the financial crisis<br />
    * Fox News caught in new fake footage scandal<br />
    * What has the EU ever done for us?<br />
    * Britons want: to reform, regulate and redistribute<br />
    * Cameron&#8217;s speech fails the poverty fact-check<br />
    * Dorries issues &#8216;apology&#8217; to Labour MP Devine<br />
    * The DNA Database fudge continues<br />
    * Poll: most voters think Sun attack back-fired<br />
    * Mutiny at Spectator against wingnuttery?<br />
    * Dan Hannan slams NHS in new video for Ron Paul<br />
    * Pinochet and Polanski: even old men should face their past<br />
    * Did the fall of the Berlin Wall kill ideology?<br />
    * Anti-Christmas nonsense arrives earlier every year<br />
    * Sun faces backlash on campaign against Brown<br />
    * Quarter of UK MEPs deny global warming too<br />
    * Reforming English Libel Law<br />
    * Pants off to impropriety<br />
    * Julie Bindel does transphobia again<br />
<strong>    * Melanie Phillips explains Gramsci</strong><br />
    * Why New Labour should pick a fight with The Sun<br />
    * Tory Michael Gove offers support for controversial school programme<br />
    * TPA condemn firefighters for saving trapped duck<br />
    * Watch: Murdoch wants to block Google (interview)<br />
    * Atlantic Bridge: Is this really a non-partisan charity?<br />
    * Telegraph omits links of leaders attacking Miliband<br />
    * Tony Benn and the Tories: don’t go there<br />
    * But will do the Met police do something?<br />
    * Where is the left&#8217;s new economic map?<br />
    * Times condemns French, not Osborne for &#8216;autistic&#8217;<br />
    * A war-criminal comes to London<br />
    * Population growth: Are you pro-cancer?<br />
    * Power 2010: Will it work?<br />
    * Immigration and next-door neighbours<br />
    * Offensive Language?<br />
    * Have we no shame?<br />
    * Why EU President Blair isn&#8217;t a bad idea<br />
    * BBC admits excessively plugging TPA<br />
    * Rally to support Prof. Nutt tomorrow<br />
    * Confessions of a leftwing Islamophobe<br />
    * Is this the only solution to Afghanistan?<br />
    * Loony Trots on Mars<br />
    * Let&#8217;s talk about sex<br />
    * Cameron&#8217;s Lithuanian ally: Children need protection from &#8216;evil&#8217; of homosexuality<br />
    * Daniel Hannan: building a base for proto-Poujadism<br />
    * Killing Iraqis with Dowsing Rods<br />
    * Bradshaw&#8217;s support for electoral reform welcome<br />
    * Will D. Miliband lead European foreign policy?<br />
    * Power 2010 attacks party leaders on reform<br />
    * This fracture is of David Cameron&#8217;s making<br />
    * Has @NadineDorriesMP blocked you on Twitter?<br />
    * A Whiff of the Branding Iron<br />
<strong>    * The continuing madness of Melanie Phillips</strong><br />
    * Who pays for Primark&#8217;s high profits?<br />
    * Sun angry over &#8216;puppy fiend&#8217;; story untrue<br />
    * Fabian &#8216;Global Change We Need&#8217; conf. Saturday<br />
    * Why are these EU-haters so silent?<br />
    * Will Tories delay Human Rights Act repeal?<br />
    * The left and the Berlin Wall<br />
    * The real questions we should ask Mr Hague over Europe<br />
    * Twitter related changes on libcon<br />
    * Be scared, be very scared<br />
    * Tory bloggers offer cover to Cameron on EU<br />
    * Mail finally deletes comments hailing death<br />
    * Tory MP: politicians treated like Jews by Nazis<br />
    * David Nutt controversy: a warning to all you reefer kids out there<br />
    * ConHome threatens civil war with Cameron over EU<br />
    * Pics: Halloween protest on &#8216;Zombie Parliament&#8217;<br />
    * Parliament to hold first gay wedding<br />
    * MacShane attacks William Hague with 10 questions<br />
    * How Goldman Sachs saw house crash coming<br />
    * Dorries gives second daughter job at office<br />
    * Prof. Nutt: Death by a bar chart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Wall</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89754</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89754</guid>
		<description>All this distracts from the real climate swindle which is carbon trading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this distracts from the real climate swindle which is carbon trading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Adams</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89717</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89717</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;By the way Mel, when are you going to apologise for causing an increase in measles through your idiot ranting about science?&lt;/i&gt;

This is a very good answer to Kojak&#039;s question @4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>By the way Mel, when are you going to apologise for causing an increase in measles through your idiot ranting about science?</i></p>
<p>This is a very good answer to Kojak&#8217;s question @4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89700</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89700</guid>
		<description>What is interesting about this is how the Conservatives have sold out to the loons and the mad people.

The Conservative base is now as wing nut and stupid as the base of the Republican party.  The party of Churchill  has become the party of Dale and Clarkson and Mel.  

I have never believed a word call me Dave says and I think if he wins,  all science matters  will have to be run   past the anti science Mad Mels of this world. 

 By the way Mel, when are you going to apologise for causing an increase in measles through your idiot ranting about science?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is interesting about this is how the Conservatives have sold out to the loons and the mad people.</p>
<p>The Conservative base is now as wing nut and stupid as the base of the Republican party.  The party of Churchill  has become the party of Dale and Clarkson and Mel.  </p>
<p>I have never believed a word call me Dave says and I think if he wins,  all science matters  will have to be run   past the anti science Mad Mels of this world. </p>
<p> By the way Mel, when are you going to apologise for causing an increase in measles through your idiot ranting about science?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Adams</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89698</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89698</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t go into the comments of you value your sanity.

My favourite (possibly ever), after spouting some anti-scientifi claptrap...

&quot;Nobody tells me that, apart from the Devil&#039;s Kitchen.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t go into the comments of you value your sanity.</p>
<p>My favourite (possibly ever), after spouting some anti-scientifi claptrap&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Nobody tells me that, apart from the Devil&#8217;s Kitchen.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89697</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89697</guid>
		<description>&quot;This was just yet more anti-scientific ignorance and ideological propaganda&quot;

Mad Mel is projecting again.


The Right is reverting to it&#039;s old habits of burglary, and criminal theft to try to make it&#039;s point. Just like Watergate we now have climate gate. 

And with the news that a climate research centre has been broken into in Canada we can see, just like Watergate this is being orchestrated by powerful, wealthy elites who want noting to stop their greed. 

The fact that Mad Mel and all the other suspects are nothing more than stenographers for their wealthy corporate  masters is no surprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This was just yet more anti-scientific ignorance and ideological propaganda&#8221;</p>
<p>Mad Mel is projecting again.</p>
<p>The Right is reverting to it&#8217;s old habits of burglary, and criminal theft to try to make it&#8217;s point. Just like Watergate we now have climate gate. </p>
<p>And with the news that a climate research centre has been broken into in Canada we can see, just like Watergate this is being orchestrated by powerful, wealthy elites who want noting to stop their greed. </p>
<p>The fact that Mad Mel and all the other suspects are nothing more than stenographers for their wealthy corporate  masters is no surprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89696</link>
		<dc:creator>Sy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89696</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Could someone hazard a guess as to the number of articles or poster who try to undermine what Melanie Phillips has to say?&lt;/i&gt;

Cos otherwise the sad tits like you who invariably turn up to accuse LC of Mad Mel obsession would have nothing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Could someone hazard a guess as to the number of articles or poster who try to undermine what Melanie Phillips has to say?</i></p>
<p>Cos otherwise the sad tits like you who invariably turn up to accuse LC of Mad Mel obsession would have nothing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slightly more on the Global Warming fury &#171; Freethinking Economist</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89692</link>
		<dc:creator>Slightly more on the Global Warming fury &#171; Freethinking Economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89692</guid>
		<description>[...] Liberal Conspiracy do a great job disassembling one of those &#8220;lists of 700 scientists being shamefully ignored by the grand conspiracy to fool us into cycling everywhere&#8221;.  Why exactly does Mel believe all this stuff?  What is it about thinking that we are about to be overrun by Islamists that also gives a person really definite views on the molecular properties and climate-affecting characteristics of certain carbon-based consequences of economic activity? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liberal Conspiracy do a great job disassembling one of those &#8220;lists of 700 scientists being shamefully ignored by the grand conspiracy to fool us into cycling everywhere&#8221;.  Why exactly does Mel believe all this stuff?  What is it about thinking that we are about to be overrun by Islamists that also gives a person really definite views on the molecular properties and climate-affecting characteristics of certain carbon-based consequences of economic activity? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/08/mad-mels-list-of-sceptical-climate-related-scientists/#comment-89624</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9715#comment-89624</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s Professor Titchmarsh to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s Professor Titchmarsh to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

