The most difficult job in the world
Imagine you land a job where you get paid £161-50 a day for each day you turn up (even if you stay for, like, 20 minutes) plus £86.50 a day for food, drink and taxis, and an additional £75 for office costs, without producing a single receipt.
And you can’t resign even if you wanted to. What sort of workplace would let you do that?
Some people would tell you that your boss is either a saint or an idiot of the highest degree. Everyone at work takes the piss and the whole shop functions like a joke, with average attendance rates standing at just over 50%.
Until one day, under pressure from auditors, the board, or sheer financial hardship, your gaffer decides to see sense and announces he’s going to tighten the belt.
‘Course you’d expect the “reforms” to bring in more scrutiny on costs and expenses (i.e. producing receipts) as well as a wage freeze or even a pay cut.
But no. You turn up to work (it’s not even compulsory, there’s no attendance levels, you see) and, much to your delight, you find out that the dreaded toughened up rules are so tough that you wage is actually higher – from £161-50 a day to £200!
More, you also get £140 a night for accomodation expenses and you’ll still be spared from submitting receipts, as long as you declare you’ve performed “appropriate duties”, whatever that means. Sure, now you’ll be required to clock in, but a couple of hours will do, so no worries if you get bored or your colleague’s annoying voice is getting on your nerves.
Dream job, right?
Well, welcome to the world of Unelected Peers in the House of Lords. And you know what the Senior Salaries Review Board people said (those who drafted the reforms)? “We are sending a strong signal: if you’re swinging the lead, don’t do it.”
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Claude is a regular contributor, and blogs more regularly at: Hagley Road to Ladywood
· Other posts by Claude Carpentieri
Filed under
Blog ,Humour ,Our democracy
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
On the other hand they do do a better job of scrutiny than the commons.
(Not saying much I know.)
All good fun, Claude. But we need them to teach our kids it’s not what you know, it’s who you know.
Not to mention the ex jailbirds.
Yeah, but at least with the new rules the Lords and Ladies have a chance of staying honest. Under the old rules, it was very, very, difficult.
The official excuse for the mess was that it would all be sorted out when the definitive reform of the Lords was put in place. So the mess is down, once again, to our government.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
:: The most difficult job in the world http://bit.ly/5Gbyhw
- Claire Butler
RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » The most difficult job in the world http://bit.ly/88YYzH
- Naadir Jeewa
Reading: The most difficult job in the world: Imagine you land a job where you get paid £161-50 a day f.. http://bit.ly/5vT2K0
- garyliffen
The most difficult job in the world http://bit.ly/5vT2K0
- Greg Bengtson
RT @libcon: The most difficult job in the world http://bit.ly/5Gbyhw
- SteveSmedley
RT @libcon: :: The most difficult job in the world http://bit.ly/5Gbyhw
- stuartamdouglas
The most difficult job in the world? http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2009/12/01/the-most-difficult-job-in-the-world/
- Tweets that mention Liberal Conspiracy » The most difficult job in the world -- Topsy.com
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal Conspiracy and stuartamdouglas, Claire Butler. Claire Butler said: RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » The most difficult job in the world http://bit.ly/88YYzH [...]
- uberVU - social comments
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by libcon: :: The most difficult job in the world http://bit.ly/5Gbyhw...
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Why Quantitative Easing doesn’t make common sense
» Barclays was also bailed out – Diamond doesn’t deserve a bonus
» Ten myths about private rented housing
» Even on the left, morality has its limits
» The NHS bill could be a Waterloo moment for the govt
» Ken Livingstone and gay rights – it just isn’t an issue
» Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?
» New study shows a Robinhood tax would boost growth
» In defence of Sky News’ re-Tweeting ban
» Another reason to continue banker bashing
» An attack on the wind industry is an attack on UK jobs
|
No Comments 13 Comments 21 Comments 30 Comments 21 Comments 13 Comments 49 Comments 11 Comments 77 Comments 5 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Daniel Key posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Sally posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » Look Left - Beginning of the end on the NHS bill | Left Foot Forward posted on David Lammy has a point on the racial divide on smacking ban » Chaise Guevara posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles? » Cylux posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » Solomon Hughes posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Richard W posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » ukliberty posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles? » Solomon Hughes posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Tim Worstallt posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » the a&e charge nurse posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles? » Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Violence in the office | My Blog posted on Violence in the office |









