<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Policy Exchange: You win some, you lose some&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/</link>
	<description>creating a new liberal-left force</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:18:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Veritas</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/#comment-90434</link>
		<dc:creator>Veritas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9498#comment-90434</guid>
		<description>The case was struck out purely on a technicality: the judge ruled that charities which are not also companies cannot sue for defamation.  The ruling had absolutely nothing to do with the extremist literature.  See the report on the website of Policy Exchange&#039;s barristers: http://www.onebrickcourt.com/cases.asp?id=151

The Trust has said it is going to appeal:
http://www.nlcentralmosque.com/component/content/article/1-latest/195-policyexchange.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The case was struck out purely on a technicality: the judge ruled that charities which are not also companies cannot sue for defamation.  The ruling had absolutely nothing to do with the extremist literature.  See the report on the website of Policy Exchange&#8217;s barristers: <a href="http://www.onebrickcourt.com/cases.asp?id=151" rel="nofollow">http://www.onebrickcourt.com/cases.asp?id=151</a></p>
<p>The Trust has said it is going to appeal:<br />
<a href="http://www.nlcentralmosque.com/component/content/article/1-latest/195-policyexchange.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nlcentralmosque.com/component/content/article/1-latest/195-policyexchange.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john b</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/#comment-87583</link>
		<dc:creator>john b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9498#comment-87583</guid>
		<description>@4, I&#039;ll be similarly interested in whether any of the keen border control advocates here are willing to take up the case of an illegal immigrant travelling on invalid documents, or whether they&#039;d be happy for her to suffer the same fate they&#039;ve decreed for people who do the same in the UK.

(anyway. It&#039;s not a very interesting case, as Turkey is an ECHR signatory so &lt;i&gt;of course she won&#039;t fucking be sent back&lt;/i&gt;...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@4, I&#8217;ll be similarly interested in whether any of the keen border control advocates here are willing to take up the case of an illegal immigrant travelling on invalid documents, or whether they&#8217;d be happy for her to suffer the same fate they&#8217;ve decreed for people who do the same in the UK.</p>
<p>(anyway. It&#8217;s not a very interesting case, as Turkey is an ECHR signatory so <i>of course she won&#8217;t fucking be sent back</i>&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Visiting</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/#comment-87582</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Visiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9498#comment-87582</guid>
		<description>Back on track... a reaction from a leading Islamic figure:

Egypts mufti Ali Gomaa: &quot;This proposal...is not considered just an attack on freedom of beliefs, but also an attempt to insult the feelings of the Muslim community in and outside Switzerland.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back on track&#8230; a reaction from a leading Islamic figure:</p>
<p>Egypts mufti Ali Gomaa: &#8220;This proposal&#8230;is not considered just an attack on freedom of beliefs, but also an attempt to insult the feelings of the Muslim community in and outside Switzerland.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Visiting</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/#comment-87581</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Visiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9498#comment-87581</guid>
		<description>off topic warning - but has any of the keen atheists here followed the case of Negar Azizmoradi -she faces the death penalty for apostasy in Iran, if the Turkish authorities decide to send her back.

http://www.ansamed.info/en/news/ME03.XAM10470.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>off topic warning &#8211; but has any of the keen atheists here followed the case of Negar Azizmoradi -she faces the death penalty for apostasy in Iran, if the Turkish authorities decide to send her back.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ansamed.info/en/news/ME03.XAM10470.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ansamed.info/en/news/ME03.XAM10470.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North London Central Mosque Loses Libel Case against Policy Exchange &#171; Bartholomew&#8217;s Notes on Religion</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/#comment-87578</link>
		<dc:creator>North London Central Mosque Loses Libel Case against Policy Exchange &#171; Bartholomew&#8217;s Notes on Religion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9498#comment-87578</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; Bartholomew&#8217;s Notes on Religion on Saving Child Witches: A Nigerian&#160;PerspectiveLiberal Conspiracy &#187; Policy Exchange: You win some, you lose some&#8230; on North London Central Mosque Loses Libel Case against Policy&#160;Exchangefrance on Helen Ukpabio [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; Bartholomew&#8217;s Notes on Religion on Saving Child Witches: A Nigerian&nbsp;PerspectiveLiberal Conspiracy &raquo; Policy Exchange: You win some, you lose some&#8230; on North London Central Mosque Loses Libel Case against Policy&nbsp;Exchangefrance on Helen Ukpabio [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unity</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/#comment-87496</link>
		<dc:creator>Unity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9498#comment-87496</guid>
		<description>Tim:

This one&#039;s slightly more complicated than usual because the fact that the mosque is operated by a unincorporated charitable trust throws up a couple of very technical possibilities in regards to its legal status and whether it can legitimately make use of charitable funds to pursue a defamation action.

That said, as its only managed to file its annual return and account on time once in the last four years, I&#039;m inclined to think that preternaturally incompetent may not be that far from the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim:</p>
<p>This one&#8217;s slightly more complicated than usual because the fact that the mosque is operated by a unincorporated charitable trust throws up a couple of very technical possibilities in regards to its legal status and whether it can legitimately make use of charitable funds to pursue a defamation action.</p>
<p>That said, as its only managed to file its annual return and account on time once in the last four years, I&#8217;m inclined to think that preternaturally incompetent may not be that far from the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim J</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/#comment-87492</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9498#comment-87492</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The key phrase in this piece of news seems to be ’struck out’, which gives no clues whatsoever as to the reason that the mosque’s libel action failed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Au contraire.  It gives an extremely good clue.  Cases can be struck out in three circumstances - they amount to an abuse of process (e.g.: are vexatious, scurrilous or ill-founded); there are no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim; or the claimant has breached a provision that leads to automatic striking out.  CPR Rule 3.4 if you want to go and check my working.

Getting a case struck out is pretty hard - and usually a sign that the claimants/defendants in question were either preternaturally incompetent or had no semblance of a case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The key phrase in this piece of news seems to be ’struck out’, which gives no clues whatsoever as to the reason that the mosque’s libel action failed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Au contraire.  It gives an extremely good clue.  Cases can be struck out in three circumstances &#8211; they amount to an abuse of process (e.g.: are vexatious, scurrilous or ill-founded); there are no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim; or the claimant has breached a provision that leads to automatic striking out.  CPR Rule 3.4 if you want to go and check my working.</p>
<p>Getting a case struck out is pretty hard &#8211; and usually a sign that the claimants/defendants in question were either preternaturally incompetent or had no semblance of a case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjcjc</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/#comment-87486</link>
		<dc:creator>cjcjc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9498#comment-87486</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; The upshot of all this seems to be that the allegation that extremist literature was being distributed from the North London Central Mosque, or from a bookshop associated with it, does not rest solely on the evidence provided by the forged receipts exposed by Newsnight, but can be readily verified by other means. &lt;/i&gt;

Why does the phrase &quot;no shit, Sherlock&quot; spring to mind?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> The upshot of all this seems to be that the allegation that extremist literature was being distributed from the North London Central Mosque, or from a bookshop associated with it, does not rest solely on the evidence provided by the forged receipts exposed by Newsnight, but can be readily verified by other means. </i></p>
<p>Why does the phrase &#8220;no shit, Sherlock&#8221; spring to mind?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/#comment-87484</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9498#comment-87484</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;:: Policy Exchange: You win some, you lose some... http://bit.ly/4BGm8I&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">:: Policy Exchange: You win some, you lose some&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/4BGm8I" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4BGm8I</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spinwatch</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/#comment-87566</link>
		<dc:creator>Spinwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9498#comment-87566</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @libcon: :: Policy Exchange: You win some, you lose some... http://bit.ly/4BGm8I&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @libcon: :: Policy Exchange: You win some, you lose some&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/4BGm8I" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4BGm8I</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unity</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/30/policy-exchange-you-win-some-you-lose-some/#comment-87483</link>
		<dc:creator>Unity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9498#comment-87483</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @libcon: :: If you must call your blog &#039;The Spitoon&#039;, don&#039;t be surprised if I gob in it - http://bit.ly/4BGm8I&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @libcon: :: If you must call your blog &#39;The Spitoon&#39;, don&#39;t be surprised if I gob in it &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/4BGm8I" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4BGm8I</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
