Policy Exchange win libel case?


by Don Paskini    
November 30, 2009 at 4:33 pm

Andrew Gilligan at the Telegraph is reporting that the right-wing think tank Policy Exchange has won a significant victory in their libel case brought by the North London Central Mosque.

Gilligan writes that Policy Exchange says on its website:

“The Trustees of Policy Exchange are delighted to report that Mr Justice Eady yesterday struck out the claim brought against us by the North London Central Mosque.

“North London Central Mosque commenced an action against Policy Exchange and Dr Denis MacEoin for libel, following publication of our study “The Hijacking of British Islam” in October 2007.

“Six trustees who had advanced the claim on behalf of the North London Central Mosque were ordered to pay Policy Exchange’s costs of defending this action.

The High Court made a further Order that £75,000 of those costs be paid by North London Central Mosque within 28 days.””

It’s probably my technological incompetence, but at the time of writing, I can’t find this quote anywhere on the actual Policy Exchange website (Gilligan and others link to the main website, rather than any news story). Can anyone help source this?

UPDATE – found the statement, it is in the right hand column at the bottom.

                Post to del.icio.us

· About the author: Don Paskini is Deputy Editor of Liberal Conspiracy. He also blogs at donpaskini

· Other posts by Don Paskini

· Filed under: news


6 Comments in response   ||  



Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    :: Policy Exchange win libel case? http://bit.ly/4WIRy2



Reader comments

Am I the only one who feels a little shiver of fear go down their spine whenever they read the dread words “Mr Justice Eady”?

No, Martin, you’re not. He does seem to be a busy chap though, doesn’t he?

Gillgan and Policy Exchange, a match made in hell. Go back a long way, those two propaganda experts.

If that report is accurate, then Policy Exchange have done more than just ‘win’ their libel action; they have managed to get the claimants’ case struck out – ie: their entire case was found to be either an abuse of process or it had no reasonable prospect of success. It’s a stringent test: judges are reluctant to strike out claims that just look a little bit hopeless.

Be interesting to see what detail comes out as to the reasons for the strike-out.

5. Alisdair Cameron

Eady again? Are there no other judges dealing with libel cases? How on earth does he get all of the big ‘uns?

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or rss feeds.
Recent articles across Liberal Conspiracy
LibCon news

8 Comments 18 Comments 15 Comments 20 Comments 10 Comments 26 Comments 57 Comments 67 Comments 2 Comments 49 Comments

click here!



LATEST COMMENTS
» Paul Sagar posted on Biased media reporting of Bolton EDL riots

» Yurrzem! posted on Biased media reporting of Bolton EDL riots

» Yurrzem! posted on Biased media reporting of Bolton EDL riots

» blanco posted on Biased media reporting of Bolton EDL riots

» crusade posted on Against multiculturalism

» Gareth Winchester posted on Vote Pirate Party

» 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism

» 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism

» ukliberty posted on Vote Pirate Party

» ukliberty posted on Vote Pirate Party

» Thebee posted on Tories offer state funding to schools linked to 'occult society'

» Just Visiting posted on Against multiculturalism

» Just Visiting posted on Against multiculturalism

» AndyG posted on Biased media reporting of Bolton EDL riots

» Matt Munro posted on Vote Pirate Party

  Last 50 // Comments feed