The new PCC chair will let journalism down too

10:00 pm - November 16th 2009

by Mark Pack    

      Share on Tumblr

“Let me make sure you know exactly who I am and what I am going to do at the PCC” – so said Baroness Buscombe, the new chair of the Press Complaints Commission (PCC), at the annual conference of the Society of Editors.

Having read her speech in full, I fear I do know what she is going to do at the PCC – and that I’m not going to like it.

It’s a curious speech in several ways. She started off by recounting in some detail her Conservative Party roots. Leading off with the fact that she’s a Conservative, added to the jibes at Labour and the silence about other parties (even though her reference to civil liberties gave an obvious opportunity to mention the Liberal Democrats, for example), leaves an obvious question about what her motives were.

I’m sure she’s a smart person and can’t have been unaware that the message many people will take from her speech is, “I’m a Conservative”. Is that really the right message for the chair of the PCC – which has to deal with complaints about political stories all in an equitable manner – to send? Is it the best way to reassure the public about how self-regulation will work on her watch?

There were also some rather astringent comments about Google and news aggregators:

“Together the press, all commercial broadcasters, film, book publishing and music industries must now work together to find a new business model with the Search Engines. The latter, the aggregators, think it is ok to enjoy the use of all your valuable intellectual property and ad revenues for little or no return.”

Whilst the chair of the PCC doesn’t need to be a technical aspect, I’m disappointed that she should make such an obviously wrong comment. If you look at many news aggregators they most certainly do not “use all of your valuable intellectual property”. Instead they take only the headline (and sometimes a following sentence or two) from a story and then link through to the original source.

It is as if the message was a comforting nod towards newspaper editors that she is on their side: she doesn’t like Google and she’d get on with any future Conservative government (so helping head off any moves for statutory regulation). That may be nice for them to hear – but choosing to stress her Conservative roots and her antipathy to search engines and aggregators is hardly taking the line of putting the public’s interests first.

Somewhat oddly, although she praised the media’s assault on MPs over expenses, when it came to her own chamber – the House of Lords – media criticism was not welcomed by her, for she asked, “Is it really in anyone’s interests for the media to be party to the undermining of our Second Chamber…?”

What was missing in her speech was an answer to the scale of the mistrust which engulfs journalism in this country. The latest MORI annual reputation survey puts journalists as the second least trusted profession in the country. Yet reading her defence of the current system of self-regulation and how it works you could be forgiven for thinking that journalism is one of the most trusted professions rather than scrambling to avoid the wooden spoon at the other end of the table.

In fairness, we did get six sentences about review governance structures and not being complacent. But for a profession so little trusted, simply slipping in the comment “I cannot ignore the strength of feeling that ranges from indignation to rage that exists among some of my colleagues in Westminster. So my priority is to do all I can to reassure politicians, opinion formers and – most importantly of all – the public that we are robust enough and responsible enough to be left alone” is not nearly enough.

Rather than get a plan to match the scale of the public distrust of journalism, we got a lengthy exposition of Baroness Buscombe’s Conservative Party roots. At best, that’s a serious misjudgement. At worst, it’ll let the public and journalism down.

    Share on Tumblr   submit to reddit  

About the author
Mark works at Blue Rubicon and lectures at City University. He also edits Liberal Democrat Newswire - the monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats. He is co-author, 101 Ways To Win An Election and blogs here.
· Other posts by

Story Filed Under: Blog ,Conservative Party ,Media ,Technology ,Westminster

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Reader comments

I view the PCC as the Prince Charles Complaints commission.

He is the only person they get off their backside for.

It’s important for democracy that our press is not regulated by the state, but instead by itself. That’s an important tenet of free speech, a plank of our democracy.

That our newspapers are owned by billionaire Australian press barons or tax-exiles hiding on the Isle of Sark, or that one of the key decision makers at the PCC is editor in chief of one of the newspaper most regularly complained against, is absolutely irrelevant.

Smash the evil BBC monopoly, I say. Kill google. Self regulation works.

It’s democracy, yeah?

No surprise the PCC appointed a Tory regulator – now the incoming govt won’t touch it with a bargepole.

Sunny, you’re just a bitter, whining lefty.

There’s no problem with the PCC. Watchdogs without teeth (or even bark) are all that’s required. The market will sort things out, and that’s efficient and we can leave it all alone.

If little people end up getting screwed by a newspaper, that’s ok, they can use their freedom as rational economic actors to buy another newspaper, thus bringing market pressure to bear in order to affect change.


If little people end up getting screwed by a newspaper, that’s ok, they can use their freedom as rational economic actors to buy another newspaper, thus bringing market pressure to bear in order to affect change.

How is it possible for little people to end up getting screwed by a newspaper? My guess is that the only way this can happen is if that newspaper somehow manages to put enough pressure on the government to ensure the little guy gets screwed; in which case, it seems to me, your problem is not so much with the market after all.


Try Nick Davies’ book Flat Earth News for a nice account of how the Daily Mail made up a series of unsubstantiated lies about a couple, whom they erroneously claimed to be murderers – despite their having been acquited, in a court of law – just for the fun of it. Read all about how this couple had their lives ruined, and the Daily Mail was never held responsible because, guess what, there’s no legal aid for libel in UK courts of law.

Yes, newspapers can ruin little people’s lives. Directly and personally. And that’s why the god damn state – as a third party sovereign authority – is required to step-in and control the worst excesses (not that it does at present, mind).

That these problems don’t arise in Libertopia because there everything bad is the fault of the government (or if not it’s fault, then only exacerbated by the government), is simply an indication of the fact Libertopia is a Utopia, and in the sense of “no place”, not a More-esque punt on “happy-place” (which it certainly would not be).

Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Marie McDaniel

    Liberal Conspiracy » The new PCC chair will let journalism down too: What was missing in her speech was an answ..

  2. Press Corruption Club « Ten Percent

    […] & highly active member of the Conservative party who in her debut PCC speech makes clear her allegiances to Cameron’s tribe, so press regulation under a tory government, hmm do you suppose it might favour the ruling […]

  3. Liberal Conspiracy » Blogging and PCC Regulation – A Collective Response

    […] may have either seen on the Indy’s website, or picked up on from Mark’s commentary on her speech to the Society of Editors, Baroness Buscombe, the new Chair of the Press Complaints Commission, has been making noises about […]

  4. When it comes to the PCC we’re all just monkeys « Left Outside

    […] Posted on November 17, 2009 by leftoutside The new head of the Press Complaints Commission Baroness Buscombe wants to regulate us […]

  5. What to make of Baroness Buscombe’s speech as chair of the PCC? | Mark Pack

    […] Cross-posted from Liberal Conspiracy: […]

  6. The LDV Friday Five (ish): 20/11/09

    […] The new PCC chair will let journalism down too (Mark Pack | Liberal Conspiracy) “Baroness Buscombe, the new chair of the Press Complaints […]

  7. What should be done with the PCC?

    […] then the PCC’s new Chair, Baroness Buscombe, delivered a lacklustre and confused address to the Society of Editors, before setting any number of hares running by suggesting the PCC might […]

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.