<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cameron&#8217;s speech fails the poverty fact-check</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Hunt</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83406</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83406</guid>
		<description>@31,

I think Sunder was just fishing around for a statistic, any statistic, that made his case.

The whole point of Gini is that it compares *all* percentiles, not just two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@31,</p>
<p>I think Sunder was just fishing around for a statistic, any statistic, that made his case.</p>
<p>The whole point of Gini is that it compares *all* percentiles, not just two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart White</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83374</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83374</guid>
		<description>Philip @ 30: I don&#039;t think Sunder is suggesting that we ignore what happens in the top 1% or that we just drop the Gini coefficient. He&#039;s pointing out that by itself the Gini coefficient can give a potentially misleading sense of the full picture because it can rise even when inequality falls across the bulk of the distribution. To get a full picture it helps to complement the Gini by other measures like the 90:10 ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip @ 30: I don&#8217;t think Sunder is suggesting that we ignore what happens in the top 1% or that we just drop the Gini coefficient. He&#8217;s pointing out that by itself the Gini coefficient can give a potentially misleading sense of the full picture because it can rise even when inequality falls across the bulk of the distribution. To get a full picture it helps to complement the Gini by other measures like the 90:10 ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron’s speech fails the poverty fact-check &#124; called2account</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83245</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron’s speech fails the poverty fact-check &#124; called2account</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83245</guid>
		<description>[...] Liberal Conspiracy » Cameron’s speech fails the poverty fact-check. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liberal Conspiracy » Cameron’s speech fails the poverty fact-check. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Hunt</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83158</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83158</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;However, the rise in the Gini is caused by runaway inequality in the top 1% and particularly the top 0.2% – while the 90:10 gap between those 10% from the top and 10% from the bottom has narrowed under Labour.&lt;/i&gt;

By your favoured crierion, if 1% of the population had everything and the other 99% had nothing, Britain would be a completely equal society.

I submit that this is nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>However, the rise in the Gini is caused by runaway inequality in the top 1% and particularly the top 0.2% – while the 90:10 gap between those 10% from the top and 10% from the bottom has narrowed under Labour.</i></p>
<p>By your favoured crierion, if 1% of the population had everything and the other 99% had nothing, Britain would be a completely equal society.</p>
<p>I submit that this is nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil H</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83167</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83167</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Cameron&#039;s speech on poverty, surprise surprise, doesn&#039;t reflect reality http://tinyurl.com/ya74vvx&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Cameron&#39;s speech on poverty, surprise surprise, doesn&#39;t reflect reality <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ya74vvx" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ya74vvx</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob B</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83137</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83137</guid>
		<description>Hi Sunder,

I doubt that many in the electorate will be moved by arcane debates about Gini coefficients and the politically correct definition of poverty. For a start, many are sceptical about both the government and statistics. Combine the two and the result is apt to be even less credible than either separately.

For all the space given to Cameron&#039;s speech in parts of the media, I wasn&#039;t impressed. IMO the text doesn&#039;t survive even the most basic academic tests for substance over vacuous rhetoric spun to make cuts in income support programmes and the public services seem more palatable.

Has any country achieved Cameron&#039;s vision of &quot;the Big Society&quot;, if so where and if not why not?

Cameron thinks government and the state have become too big but is it possible for &quot;society&quot; - whatever that is - to become &quot;too big&quot; and how could we tell? Can a country have more than one Big Society or isn&#039;t that allowed?

Was there ever a time in Britain&#039;s history when &quot;society&quot; was bigger, if so when?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sunder,</p>
<p>I doubt that many in the electorate will be moved by arcane debates about Gini coefficients and the politically correct definition of poverty. For a start, many are sceptical about both the government and statistics. Combine the two and the result is apt to be even less credible than either separately.</p>
<p>For all the space given to Cameron&#8217;s speech in parts of the media, I wasn&#8217;t impressed. IMO the text doesn&#8217;t survive even the most basic academic tests for substance over vacuous rhetoric spun to make cuts in income support programmes and the public services seem more palatable.</p>
<p>Has any country achieved Cameron&#8217;s vision of &#8220;the Big Society&#8221;, if so where and if not why not?</p>
<p>Cameron thinks government and the state have become too big but is it possible for &#8220;society&#8221; &#8211; whatever that is &#8211; to become &#8220;too big&#8221; and how could we tell? Can a country have more than one Big Society or isn&#8217;t that allowed?</p>
<p>Was there ever a time in Britain&#8217;s history when &#8220;society&#8221; was bigger, if so when?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHG</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83078</link>
		<dc:creator>DHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83078</guid>
		<description>Kojak, you will have to forgive my reservations when a lot of sock puppets and trolls are about, I do think that it is a wee bit too easy at Lib Con to impersonate others but understand some methods can cut down on the discussion.

Anyway, thanks for your good wishes and apologies for my distrust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kojak, you will have to forgive my reservations when a lot of sock puppets and trolls are about, I do think that it is a wee bit too easy at Lib Con to impersonate others but understand some methods can cut down on the discussion.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for your good wishes and apologies for my distrust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kojak</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83071</link>
		<dc:creator>Kojak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83071</guid>
		<description>DHG re: Comment 26,

I doubt whether my motives are any different to the other people here - but I can understand your reservations.

One way to avoid impersonators is for the host to give everyone a number and to display it along with the persons name. But, apart from being a bore and treating people like kiddies, it could change the nature of the site and require too much monitoring to make it viable. 

Wishing you well with your shows.

Kojak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DHG re: Comment 26,</p>
<p>I doubt whether my motives are any different to the other people here &#8211; but I can understand your reservations.</p>
<p>One way to avoid impersonators is for the host to give everyone a number and to display it along with the persons name. But, apart from being a bore and treating people like kiddies, it could change the nature of the site and require too much monitoring to make it viable. </p>
<p>Wishing you well with your shows.</p>
<p>Kojak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHG</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83059</link>
		<dc:creator>DHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83059</guid>
		<description>Kojak:

It&#039;s a little odd because I&#039;ve not been mentioning it for a couple of months at all but a while back I did suggest people come and see it and you&#039;ll have to forgive me in the current climate but I am rather suspicious of your motives.

As for the question you ask, the Internet and the written word upon is a pretty base and flat form, rather easy to impersonate anyone actually, including you.

And putting on shows is what I do.

Also, I don&#039;t live in Notts anymore and haven&#039;t done for some 5 years so haven&#039;t seen the new space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kojak:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a little odd because I&#8217;ve not been mentioning it for a couple of months at all but a while back I did suggest people come and see it and you&#8217;ll have to forgive me in the current climate but I am rather suspicious of your motives.</p>
<p>As for the question you ask, the Internet and the written word upon is a pretty base and flat form, rather easy to impersonate anyone actually, including you.</p>
<p>And putting on shows is what I do.</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t live in Notts anymore and haven&#8217;t done for some 5 years so haven&#8217;t seen the new space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kojak</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83051</link>
		<dc:creator>Kojak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83051</guid>
		<description>DHG re: Comment 16,

&quot;although why you’re going and looking such things up I’m not so sure.&quot;

Why?  
Because you&#039;ve been mentioning it for a number of months now and a while back you suggested people here come and see the show.

The question you should really ask is, how come someone gave such a good impersonation of you merely by being so abusive?

Apart from that - good luck to you for having the enthusiasm to put on a show.

(By the way are you going to see the Nottingham Contemporary?  A few months ago, when up visiting friends, I had a peek and was quite intrigued. It was far from open but looked intersting)

Kojak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DHG re: Comment 16,</p>
<p>&#8220;although why you’re going and looking such things up I’m not so sure.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why?<br />
Because you&#8217;ve been mentioning it for a number of months now and a while back you suggested people here come and see the show.</p>
<p>The question you should really ask is, how come someone gave such a good impersonation of you merely by being so abusive?</p>
<p>Apart from that &#8211; good luck to you for having the enthusiasm to put on a show.</p>
<p>(By the way are you going to see the Nottingham Contemporary?  A few months ago, when up visiting friends, I had a peek and was quite intrigued. It was far from open but looked intersting)</p>
<p>Kojak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83050</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83050</guid>
		<description>Blimey, how odd!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blimey, how odd!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatterface</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83045</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatterface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83045</guid>
		<description>&#039;14 – nope. I just like Muphry’s Law.&#039;

I like Nesbitt&#039;s moustache. Worthy of Jason King.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8217;14 – nope. I just like Muphry’s Law.&#8217;</p>
<p>I like Nesbitt&#8217;s moustache. Worthy of Jason King.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHG</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83043</link>
		<dc:creator>DHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83043</guid>
		<description>Thank you Don, I really appreciate that and may I have the IP details please or pass them to Sunny to pass to me who has my personal email, for reference and I am keeping something of a file!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Don, I really appreciate that and may I have the IP details please or pass them to Sunny to pass to me who has my personal email, for reference and I am keeping something of a file!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Paskini</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83040</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Paskini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83040</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve deleted the comments from whoever was impersonating Daniel and logged the ip address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve deleted the comments from whoever was impersonating Daniel and logged the ip address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHG</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83038</link>
		<dc:creator>DHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83038</guid>
		<description>First off Kojak, comment 16 isn&#039;t me, it&#039;s some odd stalker who likes to pretend they&#039;re me because...well, no idea really.

Second, the quote isn&#039;t in relation to Poles Apart, it was from the BBC in relation to another show of ours, although why you&#039;re going and looking such things up I&#039;m not so sure. Each to their own but don&#039;t make me suspicious that the impersonator is you, as I&#039;ll ask Sunny for the IP details.

Best just to calm down Kojak for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off Kojak, comment 16 isn&#8217;t me, it&#8217;s some odd stalker who likes to pretend they&#8217;re me because&#8230;well, no idea really.</p>
<p>Second, the quote isn&#8217;t in relation to Poles Apart, it was from the BBC in relation to another show of ours, although why you&#8217;re going and looking such things up I&#8217;m not so sure. Each to their own but don&#8217;t make me suspicious that the impersonator is you, as I&#8217;ll ask Sunny for the IP details.</p>
<p>Best just to calm down Kojak for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHG</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83035</link>
		<dc:creator>DHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83035</guid>
		<description>Indeed, anyone with moderating powers, could you please delete from Comment 16 onwards and the person impersonating me, could you please just email me and share whatever your issue is with me rather than being a dick over here thanks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, anyone with moderating powers, could you please delete from Comment 16 onwards and the person impersonating me, could you please just email me and share whatever your issue is with me rather than being a dick over here thanks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim J</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83031</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83031</guid>
		<description>I was assuming that the bizarre and offensive ranting above wasn&#039;t from you, as it seemed to be entirely unprompted and at odds with the rest of the thread.  I thought someone was mimicking you again, as has happened before.

I&#039;m staggered that you think it acceptable to comment like that.  I&#039;d also be staggered if this site leaves your comments to stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was assuming that the bizarre and offensive ranting above wasn&#8217;t from you, as it seemed to be entirely unprompted and at odds with the rest of the thread.  I thought someone was mimicking you again, as has happened before.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m staggered that you think it acceptable to comment like that.  I&#8217;d also be staggered if this site leaves your comments to stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim J</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83017</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83017</guid>
		<description>16 - I&#039;m assuming that isn&#039;t actually you Daniel?  In any event, slightly over the top I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16 &#8211; I&#8217;m assuming that isn&#8217;t actually you Daniel?  In any event, slightly over the top I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHG</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83016</link>
		<dc:creator>DHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83016</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad but perhaps you should save that for elsewhere, perhaps your own blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad but perhaps you should save that for elsewhere, perhaps your own blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim J</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83011</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83011</guid>
		<description>14 - nope.  I just like Muphry&#039;s Law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14 &#8211; nope.  I just like Muphry&#8217;s Law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHG</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83008</link>
		<dc:creator>DHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83008</guid>
		<description>You seem confused Tonga Tim that you&#039;ve actually been any assistance in basic reading comprehension, clearly your mind, addled with sherry, has at last given way.

And you would have to wonder Tonga Tim why you&#039;d be snarking, as you so delightfully put it, in a thread about your mighty leader in the first place?

Any chance you were taking part in a bit of LOOK OVER THERE action?

Of course not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem confused Tonga Tim that you&#8217;ve actually been any assistance in basic reading comprehension, clearly your mind, addled with sherry, has at last given way.</p>
<p>And you would have to wonder Tonga Tim why you&#8217;d be snarking, as you so delightfully put it, in a thread about your mighty leader in the first place?</p>
<p>Any chance you were taking part in a bit of LOOK OVER THERE action?</p>
<p>Of course not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim J</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83007</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83007</guid>
		<description>Always happy to assist with basic reading comprehension...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always happy to assist with basic reading comprehension&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHG</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83006</link>
		<dc:creator>DHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83006</guid>
		<description>Well that&#039;s grand Tonga Tim!

At least that&#039;s all cleared up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s grand Tonga Tim!</p>
<p>At least that&#8217;s all cleared up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim J</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-83004</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-83004</guid>
		<description>To me then?  But I wasn&#039;t talking about the article at all, only snarking at Tim W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me then?  But I wasn&#8217;t talking about the article at all, only snarking at Tim W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHG</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/11/12/camerons-speech-fails-the-poverty-fact-check/#comment-82997</link>
		<dc:creator>DHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=9091#comment-82997</guid>
		<description>Tim UKIP:

You&#039;re a bit sensitive duck, wasn&#039;t talking to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim UKIP:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re a bit sensitive duck, wasn&#8217;t talking to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

