Sun faces backlash on campaign against Brown
Widespread revulsion to The Sun’s political campaign – using a dead mother’s grief to campaign against Labour – was apparent everywhere.
Embarrasingly for the paper, most of the comments underneath the initial article were supportive of Brown. Some even attacked the mother for using her son’s death for political point scoring.
This led the Sun to close comments in a follow-up article in case it faced a bigger backlash from its own readers.
On Twitter, Vincent Moss confirmed:
Newspaper attacks on Brown’s letter/eyesight now starting to backfire badly even among anti-Labour voters, according to my polling expert.
RowanDavies added:
Beginning to think the Sun has dropped a bollock on this Jamie Janes business. Comments on Mumsnet are running 15-1 in GB’s favour.
Behind the scenes there were more examples of back-tracking.
The Guardian reported Rupert Murdoch saying he regretted his editors (note the plural) had “turned very much against Gordon Brown”.
Yesterday, even the newspaper’s former political editor George Pascoe-Watson admitted…
that Brown “cares passionately about the care of our troops”, and said that there was “a danger that public opinion could go against The Sun”.
Paul Waugh at the Standard confirmed the same:
What’s not in doubt is the danger that The Sun runs in overplaying its hand on the whole affair. News websites are full of comments from the public pointing out that while Mr Brown may have blundered, his sincerity is not in doubt in writing letters to the families of the fallen.
Today, the Daily Mirror leapt to the PM’s defence.
Even The Sun today has started back-tracking, accepting that the PM’s letter was “well-meaning”.
Political Scrapbook says the Sun had form for putting words into people’s mouths, illustrating how the paper used a 7/7 victim to push for harsher terrorism legislation.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Chris is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He is an aspiring journalist and reports stories for LC.
· Other posts by Chris Barnyard
Story Filed Under: News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
It’s called The Scum for a reason.
So, the SUN have closed comments on the relevant piece, have they?
Goto http://rupertsread.blogspot.com/2009/11/google-sidewiki-now-its-our-turn.html Look at the SUN’s SideWiki, for something relevant…
Oh dear, oh dear.
http://www.hurryupharry.org/2009/11/11/the-sun-shows-how-easy-it-is-to-get-a-name-wrong/
I just wish that such errors would stick to them but after a brief fuss, it all dies down and they get away with it.
Comments on Mumsnet are running 15-1 in GB’s favour.
Were I a Labour or Tory apparatchik I’d keep a weather eye on Mumsnet. That crowd of chardonnay-soaked lechers are just the Worcester-woman demographic that both parties are after.
(Funnily enough I defended GB while my wife wanted to kick him for not rewriting the letter neatly)
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
:: Sun faces backlash on campaign against Brown http://bit.ly/2maPnP
- Andreas Paterson
RT @libcon: Sun faces backlash on campaign against Brown http://bit.ly/2maPnP <- And so it damn well should
- Patrick Daykin
RT @libcon: :: Sun faces backlash on campaign against Brown http://bit.ly/2maPnP
- Nicholas Stewart
#LiberalConspiracy Sun faces backlash on campaign against Brown http://tinyurl.com/ylfb22x
- Tweets that mention Liberal Conspiracy » Sun faces backlash on campaign against Brown -- Topsy.com
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal Conspiracy, Andreas Paterson. Andreas Paterson said: RT @libcon: Sun faces backlash on campaign against Brown http://bit.ly/2maPnP <- And so it damn well should [...]
- warrenmorgan
RT Liberal Conspiracy » Sun faces backlash on campaign against Brown http://bit.ly/2maPnP Good, Sun's conduct has been shameful
- Philip Cane
The Sun backlash continues with now even more sympathy for Brown at the expense of the paper, editors and News Corp. http://j.mp/4lurAQ
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
21 Comments 71 Comments 21 Comments 46 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 22 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » So Much For Subtlety posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » Ally. posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Roger Mexico posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Roger Mexico posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » steveb posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Chris posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Chris posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » re posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Peter Stewert posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » s cullen posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » cim posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people » steveb posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? |










