So, what do you do if your boss gets caught out writing cheques he knows he can’t cash?
Well, if you’re Tim Mongomerie then you start weaselling if your life depended on it:
DAVID CAMERON PROMISED A REFERENDUM ON AN ‘UNRATIFIED’ LISBON TREATY, NOTHING ELSE
In doing this, some will say that Cameron will have broken a “cast iron” pledge – made to Sun readers – to hold a referendum. That’s unfair….
And if you’re Iain Dale you simply pretend its all a leftist plot…
Labour and others will accuse David Cameron of reneging on a referendum promise, but Eurosceptics should not fall for their black propaganda.
Watching Mongomerie and Dale turning somersaults in an effort to direct their readers’ attention to the small print in Cameron’s promise that was never there in the first place, I can’t help but be reminded of another recent bit of prime political weaselling…
Fellow British Patriot
Question Time is scheduled for 10.35pm tomorrow evening (Thursday) and will be a milestone in the indomitable march of the British National Party towards saving our country…
However, members and supporters must be aware that this show will be a stage-managed farce organised in a specific way to leave several impressions.
The audience will be hand-picked and overtly hostile – thus giving the impression that the British people at large must be hostile to BNP views.
The panellists will be overtly hostile, even the non-political guests will be hostile.
Everyone will be hostile – this will leave the impression to non-informed viewers that BNP views have minority status.
I will, no doubt, be interrupted, shouted down, slandered, put on the spot, and subject to a scrutiny that would be a thousand times more intense than anything directed at other panellists…
Yours sincerely for Britannia
Nick Griffin MEP
You see how it is?
It’s a plot by those nasty leftists and the BNP really isn’t being led by a dough-faced bullshitter…
…just like the Tories.
In circumstances, I think we can safely sum up Cameron’s policy on Europe as follows:

| Post to del.icio.us |
:: Tory bloggers offer cover to Cameron on EU http://bit.ly/2MyCMp
Damn you, Unity. But I love the poster.
Well, in fairness, I thought Cameron’s weaselly get out clause was in there from the beginning? If the treaty is unratified, blah blah blah. So in truth Dale etc are probably correct in that he hasn’t broken a cast iron pledge, he exercised a get-out clause he very sensibly left in there.
Small consolation for most of the Tory rank and file, I’d have thought – which makes Dale and Monty and their attitudes just sad.
Hohoho – attacking Cammo on his failure to deliver a referendum post-ratification won’t do much damage. If anything it will just remind people that Labour (and for what it’s worth the LD’s) reneged on their own promises and/or play into the “you can’t trust any of them” camp. (NB – which you can’t…!)
And I thought Tory bloggers were “threatening civil war” with Cameron (Sunny yesterday).
Which is it?
Love the poster.
It’s a cracking poster. But the argument is bollocks. Right from the start – right back to 2007 – the Tories have said ‘if the Lisbon Treaty remains unratified if we win the next election, we will hold a referendum; if it has been ratified we will not let matters rest.’ The second half of this is obvious filler, but to suggest that the committment has always been to a referendum regardless of whether the Treaty was in force or not is either stupid, or deliberately disingenuous.
And for people who think Cameron should offer a referendum on Lisbon – what should the question be, and what should the resulting action be?
Oh, and if we’re parsing party leader’s speeches for strange reflections of the BNP, may I offer you British Jobs for British Workers? Or the policy of locking up teenage single mothers in hostels? Operation Fightback? Glasshouses here…
I’m no fan of Dave Lightweight, but the BNP comparison is very silly.
Yeah, let’s have a referendum on a treaty that’s already ratified and we cannot ‘unratify’ (if that’s indeed a word).
Too late lefties. If you wanted a referendum you should have got Labour to give us one.
The usual Tory junk, blame someone else and accuse them of making it up. Filth.
I always wonder if Nick Griffin knows what he’s saying is bullshit or whether he’s surrounded by yes men and deluded enough to actually believe his own bollocks.
All this can be easily resolved to quell the continuing turbulence among Conservatives.
There is nothing stopping Cameron from committing the next Conservative government to holding a referendum shortly after taking office on the option of withdrawing Britain from the European Union, using the mechanisms provided in the Lisbon Treaty.
I can’t see that happening Bob. He doesn’t want out because it would take over his whole five years in office for no gain and a lot of cost.
But criticism of his u-turn is weak given that although he was never upfront about it and avoided answering the question when asked, he never said he’d stand by his pledge after ratification – plus it is pretty clear that holding one could only damage his Government by setting an unachievable mandate.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
| 3 Comments 2 Comments 5 Comments 7 Comments 22 Comments 35 Comments 3 Comments 123 Comments 11 Comments 9 Comments | LATEST COMMENTS » Hammer posted on Against multiculturalism » Lee Griffin posted on Fabians fail the Fairness Test » Luis Enrique posted on Tax dodger, moi? » Tom posted on Tax dodger, moi? » Luis Enrique posted on Tax dodger, moi? » cjcjc posted on Tax dodger, moi? » pagar posted on Against multiculturalism » DisgustedOfTunbridgeWells posted on New Arguments for ID Cards » Tom posted on Tax dodger, moi? » Lee Griffin posted on Who benefits from Lib Dem tax cuts? » Ken McKenzie posted on Fabians fail the Fairness Test » Liberal Conspiracy posted on Election 2010 - Tackling Graph Abuse » Iain Coleman posted on Who benefits from Lib Dem tax cuts? » Matpraslin posted on Labour, Unite and the BA strike » Jim posted on Who benefits from Lib Dem tax cuts? Last 50 // Comments feed |