It has been a week now since the BNP’s Nick Griffin made his disastrous debut on Question Time, and even his own members are calling for him to leave owing to his odious performance.
But he was not the only member of the far-right party in that studio who, instead of opening his mouth, should have burrowed down a hole and veiled himself away from public speaking forever.
The other party cohort who made his BBC-QT debut was one John Clarke.
You may remember that his question was cut short, due to his lack of conviction, allowing another more eloquent member of the audience to wax lyrical about how difficult it can be for asylum seekers to integrate and find work in this country, though many manage to do it against all odds.
Imagine my surprise when, by chance, I realise he is a fairly high ranking member of the BNP. His profile on the BNP website (which I will not be linking to) reads:
John is 41 years of age, currently single and has lived in London all his life, mainly in the Croydon area. He attended Croydon College where he obtained City and Guilds qualifications in mechanical engineering and is now working as a mechanical engineer, setting and operating CNC machines (computer numerical control).
John has many interests and hobbies including reading, music, chess and watching cricket. As a younger man John enjoyed boxing, Kung Fu, football and cricket.
Controversy surrounded his eligibility as candidate for the London assembly. The Standard ran a piece that tells us of Clarke’s amusing home story:
Mr Clarke sought election as a BNP candidate in Merton in 2006 but used a false address on his nomination papers to get round the rule that council candidates must live or work in the borough. As his current biography on the BNP website confirms, he actually lives in Croydon.
After the Standard exposed the front address used by Mr Clarke, as well as another BNP candidate and the BNP supporter who actually lived there, Merton council called the police. Asked why the BNP was claiming three men and their families lived in the two bedroom maisonette, a party spokesman said: “People live in all sorts of ways these days.”
This was apparently the BNP’s big chance, but again they have proved themselves to have be composed of dullards with dubious backgrounds.
| Post to del.icio.us |
Article:: Nick Griffin not alone in QT audience http://bit.ly/2Mrdj4
RT @libcon Article:: Nick Griffin not alone in QT audience http://bit.ly/2Mrdj4
RT @libcon: Article:: Nick Griffin not alone in QT audience http://bit.ly/2Mrdj4
RT @libcon http://bit.ly/1XcrGe
RT @tweetmeme http://bit.ly/2Mrdj4
Article:: Nick Griffin not alone in QT audience http://bit.ly/2Mrdj4
RT @libcon Article:: Nick Griffin not alone in QT audience http://bit.ly/2Mrdj4
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tim Ireland, Liberal Conspiracy. Liberal Conspiracy said: Article:: Nick Griffin not alone in QT audience http://bit.ly/2Mrdj4 [...]
RT @libcon: Article:: Nick Griffin not alone in QT audience http://bit.ly/2Mrdj4
RT @libcon http://bit.ly/1XcrGe
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal Conspiracy: Article:: Nick Griffin not alone in QT audience http://bit.ly/2Mrdj4…
Who? I ask who, will stand up for the indigineous white idiot volk peoples of these sceptred isles if not the the BNP? What do immigrants and asylum seekers expect?
“Welcome, sonny”? “Make yourself at home”? “Marry my daughter”?
You’ve got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know… morons.
Tip’o'the’hat to Mel Brooks.
Good God! He looks like he could be over 50! And the producer promised me they would make sure that the audience would be weighted in favour of young 20-40 metropolitan types with a more than generous sprinkling of ethnic minorities. You can’t trust the BBC, letting in one of these oldies. I mean they only comprise around 35 per cent of the adult population! They’ll be having provincials next! Disgusting!
BNP post in attracting BNP supporters shocker!
Ah, standard lefty insinuation! What a surprise!
You would have thought that the BBC funded by us, the British public, would have managed to find an audience which represented the nation, but it’s too much for them. They had trouble finding a representative panel as well. They searched throughout the UK, screened 45 million grown-ups, and at last they found someone suitable – an American woman who lives in London. Now why did they choose her? What’s she got that my mum hasn’t?
Are we going to start identifying all the members of the audience or just the ones we disagree with? A bit RedWatch, isn’t it?
That said, I’m rather smug that I’m older than he is but look 20 years younger.
That’s what you get when you restrict your gene pool to the learners’ end where the toddlers piddle.
Isn’t he the guy who said “Why is there immigration while there’s white unemployment?” (or something very, very similar)?
Uncle Fester after a few more pies & pints, I reckons…
And as for:
““People live in all sorts of ways these days.””
I blame the ruinous influence of cricket.
Trofim, you’re becoming quite a BNP troll.
You would have thought that the BBC funded by us, the British public, would have managed to find an audience which represented the nation
It was representative of the local population – which is what BBC QT strives to get. Stop complaining BNP troll
Now why did they choose her? What’s she got that my mum hasn’t?
This made me laugh. Does your mum want to be a QT panelist?
Hey, just like Norman Tebbit’s infamous “cricket test” (see, that damned willow-and-leather business causing trouble – AGAIN!) that could be a new way of selecting panellists – the “Trofim’s Mum” test.
If they don’t possess a specific talent or education/training/knowledge/experience that Trofim’s Ma can’t match, then they don’t get on the panel.
Eminently sensible.
Heck, let’s get Trofim’s Ma on QT, then grill her about what Trofim was like as a teenager…assuming they aren’t *still* one?
And if she’s not up for it, I’d love to do QT. I know a (very) little bit about one or two subjects. And I couldn’t do worse than Jack Straw…
Rude remarks about physical appearance are a bit naff on a forum that is supposed to be about ideas. All the same, I am reminded of some repartee at a drag queen competition.
Pro Queen: How old are you, darling?
Contestant: 20.
Pro Queen: I asked for your age, not your weight in stone.
As has been said more eloquently by others, we shouldn’t take the history and ineptitude of BNP activists for granted. If they could recruit educated “clean skins”, the BNP would be a much scarier foe.
My mum’s lived 91 years in Britain. That’s 71 years longer than Bonny Greer. She’s followed Worcestershire County Cricket Club for over 50 years. She’d certainly pass the cricket test, having known many well-known cricketers personally. But I think she’d fail the race test. But if you’re going to have a token black person, why not a token old person? Does race trump age?
Phil
When they had QT in Lincoln, they bussed in people from Leicester, in order to produce the sort of ethnic mix acceptable to the BBC, otherwise the audience would have been what I think Greg Dyke would have called “hideously white”. Some striving.
hahaha, oh trofirm, I am sure your mother has all sorts of expertise in political and economic and social matters, she’s 91 and white you know. Has she actually considered approaching the producers of question time?
I’m with Kate, trofirm is unintentionally very, very funny.
The real question to be answered is; would the BBC have invited the BNP onto QT if the Gov. of the day were Tory?
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
| 2 Comments 18 Comments 15 Comments 19 Comments 9 Comments 26 Comments 56 Comments 67 Comments 2 Comments 47 Comments | LATEST COMMENTS » crusade posted on Against multiculturalism » crusade posted on Against multiculturalism » Jailhouselawyer posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Sevillista posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » selwyn marock posted on Time to re-think the Dangerous Dogs Act » ukliberty posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » ukliberty posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » W.L. posted on Time to re-think the Dangerous Dogs Act » Bob B posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Lee Griffin posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Shatterface posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » blanco posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » steveb posted on What brain scans can't teach us » Computer love « ten minutes hate posted on Time to re-think the Dangerous Dogs Act » Larry Teabag posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election Last 50 // Comments feed |