Moir: over 1000 complain; Mail admits pulling ads
The Press Complaints Commission has received over 1000 complaints today over Jan Moir’s article in the Daily Mail.
She has released a statement through the PR firm Brown LLoyd James blaming an “orchestrated campaign” and denied her article was homophobic or bigoted.
New Media Age magazine today confirmed that Daily Mail Online had indeed pulled ads from her article.
They reported James Bromley, Mail Online MD, as saying:
We removed the advertising within minutes of the article being published as we saw the strong reaction This is done frequently and by other newspapers. For example, we wouldn’t want a mobile phone ad next to an article about mobile phone masts.
The Press Complaints Commission admitted that their website had slowed down tremendously because of the huge backlash to the article.
Times journalist Caitlin Moran tweeted a tongue-in-cheek message saying: “Jan Moir better pray she never needs another hair cut or interior design job again.”
Full statement by Jan Moir (via Ian Burrell)
Some people, particularly in the gay community, have been upset by my article about the sad death of Boyzone member Stephen Gately. This was never my intention. Stephen, as I pointed out in the article was a charming and sweet man who entertained millions.
However, the point of my column-which, I wonder how many of the people complaining have fully read – was to suggest that, in my honest opinion, his death raises many unanswered questions. That was all.
Yes, anyone can die at anytime of anything. However, it seems unlikely to me that what took place in the hours immediately preceding Gately’s death – out all evening at a nightclub, taking illegal substances, bringing a stranger back to the flat, getting intimate with that stranger – did not have a bearing on his death. At the very least, it could have exacerbated an underlying medical condition.
The entire matter of his sudden death seemed to have been handled with undue haste when lessons could have been learned. On this subject, one very important point. When I wrote that ‘he would want to set an example to any impressionable young men who may want to emulate what they might see as his glamorous routine’, I was referring to the drugs and the casual invitation extended to a stranger. Not to the fact of his homosexuality.
In writing that ‘it strikes another blow to the happy-ever-after myth of civil partnerships’ I was suggesting that civil partnerships – the introduction of which I am on the record in supporting – have proved just to be as problematic as marriages.
In what is clearly a heavily orchestrated internet campaign I think it is mischievous in the extreme to suggest that my article has homophobic and bigoted undertones.”
More at Journalism.co.uk
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Chris is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He is an aspiring journalist and reports stories for LC.
· Other posts by Chris Barnyard
Filed under
News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
“In what is clearly a heavily orchestrated internet campaign”
Not content with dancing on Stephen Gately’s grave, Jan Moir does the same on satire’s resting place.
Ahh, is poor Jan claiming that she has been misunderstood?
It even sounds like a note of paranoia in her feeble rebuttal – hell, even the Fails readership are slagging her off – surely we can’t all be wrong?
‘In what is clearly a heavily orchestrated internet campaign I think it is mischievous in the extreme to suggest that my article has homophobic and bigoted undertones.”
Overtones might be more accurate.
Quite a stunningly bare-faced rebuttal from Moir, really, isn’t it…? No attempt to apologise for what she knew was inflammatory. Heck, that might just have even salvaged a tiny iota of respect from me in some capacity.
Her article was sick, and her excuses weak. I hope she loses the Mail ad revenue, brings the PCC spotlight onto the Mail in full force, and raises awareness of tabloid discrimination yet again.
Reading her weasel words is painful.
brings the PCC spotlight onto the Mail in full force
What does a full-force PCC spotlight look like exactly? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnS49c9KZw8
I wasn’t saying he died because he was gay! I was saying he died because he was a promiscuous drug-using gay!
In writing that ‘it strikes another blow to the happy-ever-after myth of civil partnerships’ I was suggesting that civil partnerships – the introduction of which I am on the record in supporting – have proved just to be as problematic as marriages.
Blinking hades, that’s unconvincing.
The whole thing’s feeble. What the hell’s wrong with homophobes these days? In the good old days, she’d have met the criticism head-on with some thunder about sodomites being struck down for their wicked peversions. That would have been honest on her part, and more entertaining for me to read, instead of all this snide innuendo followed by cowardly backpedalling.
I don’t understand the fuss. Of course it’s bigotted and unpleasant but it’s the Daily Mail for God’s sake. This is what it’s for. By their standards it’s relatively benign. The last gay man to get good press in the Daily Hitler was Portillo.
You should read the comments if you’ve not already, I know that Sim-O has them saved over at his as JPEGS.
It boggles the mind…
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Tracy Tuttle
RT @libcon: Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- Graeme Archer
RT @pickledpolitics: Hah! RT @libcon: Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- Martin Togher
RT @libcon Over 1,000 complain; Mail admits pulling ads on Moir’s article http://bit.ly/1OKN6J
- Adam Bienkov
RT @pickledpolitics Hah! RT @libcon: Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- Chris P
RT @AdamBienkov: RT @pickledpolitics Hah! Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- Tracy Tuttle
RT @libcon: Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- Graeme Archer
RT @pickledpolitics: Hah! RT @libcon: Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- Martin Togher
RT @libcon Over 1,000 complain; Mail admits pulling ads on Moir’s article http://bit.ly/1OKN6J
- Adam Bienkov
RT @pickledpolitics Hah! RT @libcon: Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- Chris P
RT @AdamBienkov: RT @pickledpolitics Hah! Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- Yahweh
Over 1,000 complain; Mail says it pulled ads from Moir. @charltonbrooker @DerrenBrown @Phonicsey http://is.gd/4nE6L
- coughlan666
RT @libcon Over 1,000 complain; Mail admits pulling ads on Moir’s article http://bit.ly/1OKN6J
- Top 5k
Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- topsy top5k en
Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- Yahweh
Over 1,000 complain; Mail says it pulled ads from Moir. @charltonbrooker @DerrenBrown @Phonicsey http://is.gd/4nE6L
- coughlan666
RT @libcon Over 1,000 complain; Mail admits pulling ads on Moir’s article http://bit.ly/1OKN6J
- Top 5k
Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- topsy top5k en
Over 1,000 complain to PCC; Mail admits pulling ads on Jan Moir's article http://bit.ly/2WByUd
- Liberal Conspiracy » Jan Moir: On the record
[...] at 12:10 pm You all know that I’m the kind of blogger who checks things out, so when Jan Moir claimed to be ‘on the record’ as supporting civil partnerships the I just had to go find out exactly [...]
- loveandgarbage
@chickyog http://bit.ly/18Gi9C http://bit.ly/2WByUd http://bit.ly/1WJ8aO http://bit.ly/3jldUc http://bit.ly/2AK6Yy
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Media finally expose problems over the NHS Bill
» High pay – in football and banking – shouldn’t be about morality
» Why Quantitative Easing doesn’t make common sense
» Barclays was also bailed out – Diamond doesn’t deserve a bonus
» Ten myths about private rented housing
» Even on the left, morality has its limits
» The NHS bill could be a Waterloo moment for the govt
» Ken Livingstone and gay rights – it just isn’t an issue
» Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?
» New study shows a Robinhood tax would boost growth
» In defence of Sky News’ re-Tweeting ban
|
94 Comments 15 Comments 17 Comments 26 Comments 42 Comments 21 Comments 13 Comments 51 Comments 11 Comments 78 Comments |
 |
LATEST COMMENTS » rentergirl posted on Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? » Sally posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Spike1138 posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish » Sally posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish » Raging Reg posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish » Spike1138 posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Dave Semple posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish » damon posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish » Spike1138 posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Spike1138 posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish » Spike1138 posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish » Cherub posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Flowerpower posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish » Cherub posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish » Spike1138 posted on Hysterical claims that Christians are "under attack" are rubbish |
