Bloggers: did you get money for reviews?
US bloggers have been asked to disclose whether they’ve received payments for product reviews by the FTC, according to a report in the Huffington Post.
For the first time the Federal Trade Commission will require that online reviews are more accurate for consumers, in effect regulating blogging.
The FTC will require that writers on the Web clearly disclose any freebies or payments they get from companies for reviewing their products. The commission also said advertisers featuring testimonials that claim dramatic results cannot hide behind disclaimers that the results aren’t typical.
The FTC has now approved guidelines that, while not binding in law, offer interpretations of the law to help advertisers comply with regulations.
Violating the rules, which take effect at the beginning of December, could result in lawsuits against online publishers by consumer groups or even rival companies of products being reviewed.
It is unclear whether the guidelines will apply to British blogs hosted on US server.
To placate such fears, Cleland said the FTC will more likely go after an advertiser instead of a blogger for violations. The exception would be a blogger who runs a “substantial” operation that violates FTC rules and already received a warning.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Chris is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He is an aspiring journalist and reports stories for LC.
· Other posts by Chris Barnyard
Filed under
News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Interesting… do magazines and such in the US already have to do this? After years of reading proper commercial US output on things like games and films I have to ask where all this disclosure has been happening already…
Interesting? It is just another attack on freedom of speech.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Article:: Bloggers: did you get money for reviews? http://bit.ly/XqZa2
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Why Quantitative Easing doesn’t make common sense
» Barclays was also bailed out – Diamond doesn’t deserve a bonus
» Ten myths about private rented housing
» Even on the left, morality has its limits
» The NHS bill could be a Waterloo moment for the govt
» Ken Livingstone and gay rights – it just isn’t an issue
» Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?
» New study shows a Robinhood tax would boost growth
» In defence of Sky News’ re-Tweeting ban
» Another reason to continue banker bashing
» An attack on the wind industry is an attack on UK jobs
|
26 Comments 15 Comments 17 Comments 26 Comments 42 Comments 21 Comments 13 Comments 49 Comments 11 Comments 78 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Dominic Newbould posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Dominic Newbould posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Anthony Adshead posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » G.O. posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Tiffany posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Rob posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Pam posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Pam posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Jennifer Hynes posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Peter Underwood posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Jim Fahie posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » OccupySydney posted on Goldman Sachs' role in killing democracy across Europe » psiloiordinary posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Panda posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Penny Jones posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" |








