Former cabinet minister James Purnell has slammed Conservative welfare policy by specifically rebutting each of the points made by Conservatives.
Writing on Open Left he said Tory plans were, “so full of holes, that the Tories are clearly hoping that the press will have moved on by the time anyone notices.”
He proceeded to point out some holes:
1. We will simplify Labour’s numerous and piecemeal programmes into one single back-to-work programme for everyone on out of work benefits.
This would be a good idea if they were proposing to do it. Indeed, it’s government policy – with the Flexible New Deal bringing previous New Deals in to one and the December 2008 White Paper proposing the same for IB and lone parents. But the press release then goes to on to add back in Youth Action for Work, Work Pairings, Work for Yourself, Work Together, Work Clubs. So, seven programmes, not one. Moreover, these seem to have a lot of the features (especially centralized design) of the original New Deal which the Tories say failed.
…
3. We will abolish the Treasury’s rule that prevents the Government paying work providers using the benefits saved once someone has a job. This will allow us to offer support to the 2.6 million people on Incapacity Benefit.
There is no such rule. The question is whether there is appetite to lend.
4. We will offer greater support to the young unemployed by referring them on to the Work Programme after 6 months of unemployment compared to a year under the Flexible New Deal.
This is misleading. Young unemployed people already get this support at 6 months – the only differences are that it’s currently delivered by Job Centres and the Tories have tinkered with the options claimants get (at the moment, the options are employment subsidies, self employment, training and volunteering).
| Post to del.icio.us |
Article:: Purnell slams Tory welfare policy http://bit.ly/9zZXV
RT @PeterBowers: RT @libcon: Article:: Purnell slams Tory welfare policy http://bit.ly/9zZXV
Article:: Purnell slams Tory welfare policy http://bit.ly/9zZXV
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tim Phillips-White. Tim Phillips-White said: RT @PeterBowers: RT @libcon: Article:: Purnell slams Tory welfare policy http://bit.ly/9zZXV [...]
[...] of cross-party agreement (despite a rather melodramatic take from LibCon that Purnell is ‘slamming‘ the welfare reforms – ‘quibbling’ more like). But the grassroots [...]
Indeed, how dare anyone try and muscle in on Purnell and his own brand of vilification for the poor and out of work.
So let’s get this straight: The mighty James Purnell, once and future scourge of the poor, is reduced to mere fisking?
Hi Justin,
Don’t knock it – Purnell is much better at fisking than he was at being a government minister.
I just don’t get James Purnell. I’m sure he’s ashamed of himself for realising how far to the right he went that he sees the Tories mirroring his policies.
That’s not exactly a repudiation of the policy is it? More along the lines of asserting that he would make a better job of being a bastard and implementing the vile Freud’s ignorant and illiberal notions.It’s a bit like hearing wife-beating going on next door, and getting irate, going round and absolutely battering the wife, saying to the thug “that’s how you should be doing it”.
Workhouse makes me laugh.
He’s complaining about a lack of press scrutiny for Tory welfare reforms, when the rank immorality and viciousness of his own welfare reforms went unremarked by a supposedly left-wing media (specifically the Independent and the Guardian) that’s proven itself more concerned with middle-class identity issues that the reality of the life for Britain’s poorest and weakest.
Workhouse should go away and play with his flexible fridge magnets.
Purnell slams proposed Tory welfare policy
Why? Are they not vicious or punitive enough for him?
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
| 2 Comments 18 Comments 15 Comments 19 Comments 9 Comments 26 Comments 56 Comments 67 Comments 2 Comments 47 Comments | LATEST COMMENTS » Bob B posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Lee Griffin posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Shatterface posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » blanco posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » steveb posted on What brain scans can't teach us » Computer love « ten minutes hate posted on Time to re-think the Dangerous Dogs Act » Larry Teabag posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » blanco posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » jungle posted on Would the actions of the Digital Economy Bill be tolerated "offline"? » Matt Munro posted on What brain scans can't teach us » Matt Munro posted on What brain scans can't teach us » oldandrew posted on What brain scans can't teach us » David Bouvier posted on What brain scans can't teach us » Luke Dicken posted on Would the actions of the Digital Economy Bill be tolerated "offline"? » Robtro posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election Last 50 // Comments feed |