Nick Robinson criticises Cameron on EU
The BBC’s Nick Robinson has written an unusually critical blog post on Cameron’s refusal to give a straight answer over the EU.
So what does the self proclaimed “straight talking” guy say about one of the biggest foreign policy dilemma he’s likely to face if he becomes prime minister?
Nothing. Nowt. Nix. Zippo. Zilch.
David Cameron’s official explanation for not telling us what he’ll do if the EU’s Lisbon Treaty is law by the time he reaches office is that “you can only have one policy at a time”. He adds that he doesn’t want to do anything to “undermine or prejudice” the ratification proceedings in Poland and the Czech Republic.
The real explanation is that he is determined that his last conference before the election will not, to use his phrase, “obsess about Europe”.
…
I joked with one senior Tory that the headline should have read “Betrayal postponed”. He smiled before chastising me for my cynicisim.
The Tories are desperately trying to kill off any internal fighting over Europe.
Roger Helmer MEP attacked Ken Clarke on his blog:
Ken Clarke appears on the front page of Saturday’s Daily Telegraph, pointing out what a huge disaster it would be if next week’s Party Conference were to be over-shadowed by a row about Europe. Of course he’s right. I think most Conservatives would agree. So if you don’t want a row about Europe, Ken, why start one? Or do you think that you can raise the issue, drop coy hints of your private (and not so private) reservations about Party policy, and assume that everyone else will shut up?
The very headline sets up the dilemma: “Clarke: Don’t let Europe wreck Tories’ chances”. So what exactly does he mean by that? Let me paraphrase. He means “Keep Quiet!”. No one should mention the EU (except, of course, himself — the licensed elder statesman).
…
The best way to avoid a row is (A) to set out a clear and unequivocal policy in line with the deeply-held convictions of the great majority of the Party; and (B) for the tiny minority of Europhiles in our midst to take a self-denying ordinance, and keep quiet.
And here we were, under the impression that the Tories valued internal debate and dissent. Only when it’s one way apparently.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Filed under
News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Yes Sunny,
but it is a critic from the wing nut extreme position of the party. . Robinson sides, AGAIN, with the Con Home people.
Remember, you can always attack the Tory leader, as long as it is from the Right. That is fine for the crackers who make up the Tory right.
The aim is to prevent the EU debate overshadowing the party conference. Strikes me as a pretty sensible strategy. I know it would be fun for the Left if the Tories began to rip each other apart over the next few days but methinks most of them are deliberately trying to avoid doing this.
“I know it would be fun for the Left if the Tories began to rip each other apart over the next few days”
It would, but if Dave Lightweight thinks it would be better to wait for the campaign to do it, then we’ll just have to be patient.
“but it is a critic from the wing nut extreme position of the party. Robinson sides, AGAIN, with the Con Home people.”
You complete and utter moron. So if you’re opposed to any further hemorrhaging of power to Brussels you must be a ‘wing nut’ extremist? That’s most of the British electorate you’re calling wing nut extremists. What would that make you then Sally?
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Article:: Nick Robinson criticises Cameron on EU http://bit.ly/68ooK
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Why Quantitative Easing doesn’t make common sense
» Barclays was also bailed out – Diamond doesn’t deserve a bonus
» Ten myths about private rented housing
» Even on the left, morality has its limits
» The NHS bill could be a Waterloo moment for the govt
» Ken Livingstone and gay rights – it just isn’t an issue
» Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?
» New study shows a Robinhood tax would boost growth
» In defence of Sky News’ re-Tweeting ban
» Another reason to continue banker bashing
» An attack on the wind industry is an attack on UK jobs
|
26 Comments 15 Comments 17 Comments 26 Comments 42 Comments 21 Comments 13 Comments 49 Comments 11 Comments 78 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Dominic Newbould posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Dominic Newbould posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Anthony Adshead posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » G.O. posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Tiffany posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Rob posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Pam posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Pam posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Jennifer Hynes posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Peter Underwood posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Jim Fahie posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » OccupySydney posted on Goldman Sachs' role in killing democracy across Europe » psiloiordinary posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Panda posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Penny Jones posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" |








