Improved teenage parent policy


by Don Paskini    
September 30, 2009 at 2:03 pm

It has come to my attention that due to an administrative error, an early draft of part of the Prime Minister’s speech was circulated and has been reported. Luckily, I have a copy of the corrected version, which I reproduce below with the errors crossed out and the amendments shown in red.

“And I do think it’s time to address a problem that for too long has been hyped and misrepresented by right-wing newspapers gone unspoken, the number of children having children. It is extremely rare cannot be right, for a girl of sixteen, to get pregnant, be given the keys to a council flat and be left on her own, and the number of teenage parents has fallen considerably since 1997.

Every family is different, and we believe in personalised public services which help support every parent and give every child the best start in life, rather than trying to grab the headlines with crude and ineffective ‘one size fits all’ policies which are expensive and unworkable. For example, many teenage parents stay at home with their parents, and others have benefited from ‘Foyer’ schemes which offer them extra help and support.

From now on all 16 and 17 year old parents who get support from the taxpayer will be give the option to live in placed in a network of supervised homes. These shared homes will offer not just a roof over their heads, but a new start in life where they learn responsibility and how to raise their children properly. That’s better for them, better for their babies and better for us all in the long run.”

*

The Labour Party would like to apologise for this administrative error.

It does not affect the announcements about a National Care Service to give better and more affordable care for elderly people, new jobs and internships, free childcare for a quarter of a million more parents, a more responsive police force, and improved service for cancer patients and people seeing their doctor, all of which are as explained by the Prime Minister, and are excellent and exciting news.


---------------------------
     


About the author
Don Paskini is deputy-editor of LC. He also blogs at donpaskini. He is on twitter as @donpaskini
· Other posts by
Filed under
Blog ,Humour ,Labour party ,Westminster


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


I’m sorry but that is complete rubbish – it’s not even a close representation of what he actually said.

Defend Gordon if you must, but yesterday the PM proposed forcing young mothers into compulsory care – http://tinyurl.com/ydj5reh

And you shouldn’t defend that.

1 – That’s rather the point of the piece…

Still ignoring the BNP provenance of the policy…?

@1 I think you’ve just done a Matt Munro

Anyway… If only this was the sort of stuff that was produced Don, unfortunately we get tabloid chasing stuff like this from Brown and unworkable policies from Harman.

And still the Sun abandoned him.

What will he try next?

Bringing back the birch?

Speaking of Harman, why on earth is her ridiculous Punternet proposal today’s Top Story?

This was a speech from the politician who thought it would be clever to get up and start spouting about “British jobs for British workers.” Once and for all, Gordon Brown is not one of the good guys.

8. Denim Justice

Isn’t it about time people like Don Paskini and Dave Osler stopped fantasising, nay, masturbating over what they wish Labour would do, and faced up to the fact that Labour will never do it.

9. Stephen Rouse

Funny and tragic at the same time. Brown’s real proposal was the moment I finally decided to abstain next spring. I no longer see the difference between New Labour and the Tories in their viciousness towards the vulnerable.

BBW @1, Chris @7 and Stephen @9: With respect – and I understand fully why you should feel so angry given the pandering to the right rhetoric in which it was delivered – the speech did not say that young mothers will be forced into compulsory care. It carefully stopped short of that because that is not what will be implemented.

I am nto trying to defend what was said, but it is important to distinguish the rhetoric from what will actually be put in place, which will in fact be an extension of some of the provision already in place e.g. foyers. The challenge will be to make sure that as it is implemented the right things get done and not the rightwing ones.

I’ve written on this at length (and am in debate with Don P about it) at http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/09/30/gordon-browns-speech-and-the-last-chance-saloon-for-tom-harris/ should you be interested. It’s fair to say that Don P takes a more negative line on the substance behind the rhetoric, and I can see why he does that, but at least we’re having the debate rather than talking about slags in gulags.

Isn’t it about time people like Don Paskini and Dave Osler stopped fantasising, nay, masturbating over what they wish Labour would do, and faced up to the fact that Labour will never do it.

I faced up to that long ago, DJ. Suffice to say that when I do have one off the wrist, ’tis not the Labour Party that I think upon.

very good post.

Thanks to Paul@9 for the link to the discussion about this.

Excellent!

14. Stephen Rouse

Paul – that’s well put and having read more about the proposal, my anger has subsided (fractionally). But surely the fact that Brown chose this rhetoric is itself significant. While he continues to pander to an illiberal agenda, rather than confront it, what is the point of Labour?


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Article:: Improved teenage parent policy http://bit.ly/rHlUB

  2. Philip Matusavage

    RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » Improved teenage parent policy http://bit.ly/2zK7cC

  3. Philip M

    RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » Improved teenage parent policy http://bit.ly/2zK7cC

  4. Liberal Conspiracy

    Article:: Improved teenage parent policy http://bit.ly/rHlUB

  5. Philip Matusavage

    RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » Improved teenage parent policy http://bit.ly/2zK7cC

  6. Gary Dunion

    Excellent post: What Brown should have said on young mums – http://tr.im/Ajc5

  7. The LDV Friday Five (ish): 2/10/09

    [...] together, 25 million people now live in Lib Dem cities.” – submitted by markpack. 5. Improved teenage parent policy (Lib Con): “Terrific piece of enlightened (and liberal) irony from Labour-as-they-come LibCon [...]





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




5 Comments



15 Comments



17 Comments



26 Comments



42 Comments



21 Comments



13 Comments



49 Comments



11 Comments



78 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» BenSix posted on Fabians change policy on unpaid internships

» Have Labour realised the election is more than three years away? | My Blog posted on Labour's wonks are becoming part of the problem

» Owen Blacker posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot"

» Richard Blogger posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot"

» Daniel Henry posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot"

» nonny mouse posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot"

» Socrates posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot"

» Bloody Yank posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Bloody Yank posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Robin Levett posted on An attack on the wind industry is an attack on UK jobs

» kernowjim posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» ROFLMFAO posted on Fabians change policy on unpaid internships

» Cherub posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» jojo posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction

» Sun journos nicked in hack enquiry shocker « andrew henley posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction