<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These smears would make Damian McBride proud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/</link>
	<description>creating a new liberal-left force</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:36:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66724</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66724</guid>
		<description>Trust me Charlie, banks only lend you money unless you can can give them security, lots of it. Obviously, they usually make sure that you&#039;re not an absolute crook, though they&#039;re not especially fussy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust me Charlie, banks only lend you money unless you can can give them security, lots of it. Obviously, they usually make sure that you&#8217;re not an absolute crook, though they&#8217;re not especially fussy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie2</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66683</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66683</guid>
		<description>53. Henry .Murdoch had a good business  repuation, that was why he was lent the $10M - the banker had faith he would get his money back. I am not talking about the reputation of his media empire, especially Fox news which   I consider is  biased towards the extreme elements of the Republican Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>53. Henry .Murdoch had a good business  repuation, that was why he was lent the $10M &#8211; the banker had faith he would get his money back. I am not talking about the reputation of his media empire, especially Fox news which   I consider is  biased towards the extreme elements of the Republican Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marr on Brown Fallout: Something to be Thankful For &#171; Bad Conscience</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66668</link>
		<dc:creator>Marr on Brown Fallout: Something to be Thankful For &#171; Bad Conscience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66668</guid>
		<description>[...] Hundal at Liberal Conspiracy has rightly been up in arms about the matter (and here, where he points us towards journalist Nick Assinder&#8217;s criticisms of Marr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hundal at Liberal Conspiracy has rightly been up in arms about the matter (and here, where he points us towards journalist Nick Assinder&#8217;s criticisms of Marr [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66660</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66660</guid>
		<description>Apart from anything else Charlie must live in a parallel universe if he think Rupert Murdoch has a good reputation. This is the man responsible for the gruesome smear machine Fox &#039;News&#039; which I suspect his son wants to bring to the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apart from anything else Charlie must live in a parallel universe if he think Rupert Murdoch has a good reputation. This is the man responsible for the gruesome smear machine Fox &#8216;News&#8217; which I suspect his son wants to bring to the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66659</link>
		<dc:creator>Sy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66659</guid>
		<description>Charlie, you appear to be an idiot. I apologise for taking up your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie, you appear to be an idiot. I apologise for taking up your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie2</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66656</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66656</guid>
		<description>51. Sy . If a person has a good  reputation people will often ignore smears or loaded questions  and they can use to ask for favours: they often can obtain the benefit of the doubt. I use the example of Murdoch as a person using his reputation to obtain an important benefit which saved his company .  When T Blair said &quot; Trust me , I am straightforward type of guy&quot; or words to that effect people did trust him  which meant they gave  him the benefit of the doubt; which saved is political bacon. Brown is now in the opposite position to Blair in his early days, any doubt and people distrust him. 

Thatcher gradually lost the good will ofher colleagues, in part ,  because of the way she treated them, such that by 1988-89, they were looking for reasons to get rid of her: so Brown in certain ways is in a similar position. The saying of &quot;go when people still want you and do not look back &quot; is relevant for any person who needs the support of people to do their job effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>51. Sy . If a person has a good  reputation people will often ignore smears or loaded questions  and they can use to ask for favours: they often can obtain the benefit of the doubt. I use the example of Murdoch as a person using his reputation to obtain an important benefit which saved his company .  When T Blair said &#8221; Trust me , I am straightforward type of guy&#8221; or words to that effect people did trust him  which meant they gave  him the benefit of the doubt; which saved is political bacon. Brown is now in the opposite position to Blair in his early days, any doubt and people distrust him. </p>
<p>Thatcher gradually lost the good will ofher colleagues, in part ,  because of the way she treated them, such that by 1988-89, they were looking for reasons to get rid of her: so Brown in certain ways is in a similar position. The saying of &#8220;go when people still want you and do not look back &#8221; is relevant for any person who needs the support of people to do their job effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66637</link>
		<dc:creator>Sy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66637</guid>
		<description>@49
What are you on about and where does Murdoch come into it (and come to that since when was (Rupert?) Murdoch saved by a piddling $10m?) I was talking about politicians in general,in particular Margaret Thatcher, who leaked against Michael Heseltine during Westland and whose press secretary called Biffen &quot;semi-detached&quot;, not long before she sacked him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@49<br />
What are you on about and where does Murdoch come into it (and come to that since when was (Rupert?) Murdoch saved by a piddling $10m?) I was talking about politicians in general,in particular Margaret Thatcher, who leaked against Michael Heseltine during Westland and whose press secretary called Biffen &#8220;semi-detached&#8221;, not long before she sacked him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie2</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66636</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66636</guid>
		<description>45.Jonnie. Thank you.

47. Sy . The difference for Brown is that he needs people to trust him and people are judging him on the last 12 years of his actions and words.  

Murdoch nearly went bust a few years ago. He needed $10M from a mid-western bank. Murdoch spoke with the president who trusted him and lent the $10M. Murdoch was saved.  Murdoch had earnt the bank president&#039;s trust because of his succesful business career stretching over 45 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>45.Jonnie. Thank you.</p>
<p>47. Sy . The difference for Brown is that he needs people to trust him and people are judging him on the last 12 years of his actions and words.  </p>
<p>Murdoch nearly went bust a few years ago. He needed $10M from a mid-western bank. Murdoch spoke with the president who trusted him and lent the $10M. Murdoch was saved.  Murdoch had earnt the bank president&#8217;s trust because of his succesful business career stretching over 45 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swatch</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66634</link>
		<dc:creator>Swatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66634</guid>
		<description>@24 Jimmy

I&#039;ve said before that I&#039;d be happy to complain about the solicitor involved in the Dorries Affair. There was some confusion as to whether anyone actually had been instructed (not least because the whole episode has been an unprofessional fiasco which reflects poorly on the profession).

Now it has apparently been confirmed, @22 above, that someone was instructed by Dorries, is anyone any clearer on who it was?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@24 Jimmy</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said before that I&#8217;d be happy to complain about the solicitor involved in the Dorries Affair. There was some confusion as to whether anyone actually had been instructed (not least because the whole episode has been an unprofessional fiasco which reflects poorly on the profession).</p>
<p>Now it has apparently been confirmed, @22 above, that someone was instructed by Dorries, is anyone any clearer on who it was?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66627</link>
		<dc:creator>Sy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66627</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Brown has spent the last 12 years undermining his own colleagues, remember Milburn, Milliband and Blair all had unfavourable leaks made against them.&lt;/i&gt;

Remember Westland? Or the &quot;semi-detached&quot; John Biffen? Politicians leak against their colleagues when it suits - it&#039;s not nice, but it&#039;s what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Brown has spent the last 12 years undermining his own colleagues, remember Milburn, Milliband and Blair all had unfavourable leaks made against them.</i></p>
<p>Remember Westland? Or the &#8220;semi-detached&#8221; John Biffen? Politicians leak against their colleagues when it suits &#8211; it&#8217;s not nice, but it&#8217;s what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjcjc</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66622</link>
		<dc:creator>cjcjc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66622</guid>
		<description>It didn&#039;t help that Brown didn&#039;t actually answer the question!

http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.com/2009/09/confucius-he-say.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It didn&#8217;t help that Brown didn&#8217;t actually answer the question!</p>
<p><a href="http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.com/2009/09/confucius-he-say.html" rel="nofollow">http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.com/2009/09/confucius-he-say.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonnie</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66615</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66615</guid>
		<description>@Charlie2

I think that sums it up perfectly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charlie2</p>
<p>I think that sums it up perfectly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bianca Von Faxmachine</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66614</link>
		<dc:creator>Bianca Von Faxmachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66614</guid>
		<description>Is it true that Mandelson was on &#039;happy pills&#039; when he made his speech to conference yesterday?
It would explain his coquettishness</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it true that Mandelson was on &#8216;happy pills&#8217; when he made his speech to conference yesterday?<br />
It would explain his coquettishness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie2</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66609</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66609</guid>
		<description>Sunny&#039;s statement &quot; These smears would make Damian McBride proud&quot; only support&#039;s the story that DM tried to smear the wife of Tory politician rgearding her mental health.  The fact that DM worked in an office run by G Brown makes him responsible . After   Henry 2 said  &quot; Who will rid me of this turbulent priest &quot; resulted in T a Beckett&#039;s murder , leaders are responsible, if their statements lead  their subordinates  to take unacceptable actions.

 When an intruder broke into the Queen&#039;s bedroom, Whitelaw, as Home Secretary offered his resignation.  Due to the invasion of the Falklands ,Carrington as Foreign Secretary resigned as a matter of principle and his integrity only increased. Both Carrington and Whitelaw were straightforward brave soldiers ( both had won the MC in Normandy) whose integrity and ability to cope in stressful situations were never questioned.

Brown has spent the last 12 years undermining his own colleagues, remember Milburn, Milliband and  Blair all had unfavourable leaks made against them.
I would suggest the reason why so many people latched on to Ward&#039;s comments is that Brown&#039;s behaviour has been so unpleasant, to so many people,for so long; especially his temper tantrums, that people give credence to the rumour mill.
If someone had tried to smear Churchill with the accusation of physical or moral cowardice during WW2 it would have been laughed out of court. Why , because Churchill&#039;s physical and moral courage were beyond question.

As M Twain said &quot; A man who has reputation for getting up at dawn can afford to get up at miday&quot;. 

Brown&#039;s actions and his present appearance  over the last 12  make it believable he could be on anti-depressants.  When Brown has needed to to draw upon his reputation, he has found he is overdrawn and the bank of public opinion will not extend his overdraft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny&#8217;s statement &#8221; These smears would make Damian McBride proud&#8221; only support&#8217;s the story that DM tried to smear the wife of Tory politician rgearding her mental health.  The fact that DM worked in an office run by G Brown makes him responsible . After   Henry 2 said  &#8221; Who will rid me of this turbulent priest &#8221; resulted in T a Beckett&#8217;s murder , leaders are responsible, if their statements lead  their subordinates  to take unacceptable actions.</p>
<p> When an intruder broke into the Queen&#8217;s bedroom, Whitelaw, as Home Secretary offered his resignation.  Due to the invasion of the Falklands ,Carrington as Foreign Secretary resigned as a matter of principle and his integrity only increased. Both Carrington and Whitelaw were straightforward brave soldiers ( both had won the MC in Normandy) whose integrity and ability to cope in stressful situations were never questioned.</p>
<p>Brown has spent the last 12 years undermining his own colleagues, remember Milburn, Milliband and  Blair all had unfavourable leaks made against them.<br />
I would suggest the reason why so many people latched on to Ward&#8217;s comments is that Brown&#8217;s behaviour has been so unpleasant, to so many people,for so long; especially his temper tantrums, that people give credence to the rumour mill.<br />
If someone had tried to smear Churchill with the accusation of physical or moral cowardice during WW2 it would have been laughed out of court. Why , because Churchill&#8217;s physical and moral courage were beyond question.</p>
<p>As M Twain said &#8221; A man who has reputation for getting up at dawn can afford to get up at miday&#8221;. </p>
<p>Brown&#8217;s actions and his present appearance  over the last 12  make it believable he could be on anti-depressants.  When Brown has needed to to draw upon his reputation, he has found he is overdrawn and the bank of public opinion will not extend his overdraft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geordie-Tory</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66608</link>
		<dc:creator>Geordie-Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66608</guid>
		<description>I was on the treadmill in the gym last night, when the First Dark Lord came on Sky News on the screen in front of me.

As I sensibly had the Rocky soundtrack (it&#039;s a great motivator!) playing in my ears rather than listen to the King of Slither&#039;s venomous outpourings, I was struck by how similar Baron Bielzebub would look to a certain Central European leader c. 1939 - 45 if only he had a small black moustache.


Perhaps the original German soundtrack could be dubbed over the ignoble Lord&#039;s speech?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was on the treadmill in the gym last night, when the First Dark Lord came on Sky News on the screen in front of me.</p>
<p>As I sensibly had the Rocky soundtrack (it&#8217;s a great motivator!) playing in my ears rather than listen to the King of Slither&#8217;s venomous outpourings, I was struck by how similar Baron Bielzebub would look to a certain Central European leader c. 1939 &#8211; 45 if only he had a small black moustache.</p>
<p>Perhaps the original German soundtrack could be dubbed over the ignoble Lord&#8217;s speech?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66603</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66603</guid>
		<description>You do wonder if the Tories have been taking lessons from their Republican friends (of course they&#039;ll deny it &amp; it may not actually come from CCHQ if they&#039;re half smart). Anyway, the tactic is to get some nasty rumour going in the blogosphere &amp; then get the mainstream media to pick it up &amp; start a &#039;serious&#039; discussion on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do wonder if the Tories have been taking lessons from their Republican friends (of course they&#8217;ll deny it &amp; it may not actually come from CCHQ if they&#8217;re half smart). Anyway, the tactic is to get some nasty rumour going in the blogosphere &amp; then get the mainstream media to pick it up &amp; start a &#8217;serious&#8217; discussion on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Is A Moron</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66600</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Is A Moron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66600</guid>
		<description>Letters Fron A Tory,

Do you think Sunny wanted a real story, or just an excuse to swear at some Conservative supporters?

I must say, one just doesn&#039;t encounter that kind of adolescent behaviour towards commenters on other political blogs. I think Sunny could be described as &#039;special&#039; himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Letters Fron A Tory,</p>
<p>Do you think Sunny wanted a real story, or just an excuse to swear at some Conservative supporters?</p>
<p>I must say, one just doesn&#8217;t encounter that kind of adolescent behaviour towards commenters on other political blogs. I think Sunny could be described as &#8217;special&#8217; himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66599</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66599</guid>
		<description>I guess the question is, do you think a political figure taking medication is a political story. I don&#039;t - in fact I rather like the line someone used in the other thread &quot;are you eating carrots Prime Minister?&quot;.

Marr can ask what questions he likes. I just won&#039;t be listening in future. But then I long gave up hope of journalists asking questions that challenge politicians rather than fuel faux outrage.

There&#039;s a rather bigger story about people&#039;s attitudes in the media and politics to mental illness and social awkwardness, they seem to be stuck in the dark ages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the question is, do you think a political figure taking medication is a political story. I don&#8217;t &#8211; in fact I rather like the line someone used in the other thread &#8220;are you eating carrots Prime Minister?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Marr can ask what questions he likes. I just won&#8217;t be listening in future. But then I long gave up hope of journalists asking questions that challenge politicians rather than fuel faux outrage.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a rather bigger story about people&#8217;s attitudes in the media and politics to mental illness and social awkwardness, they seem to be stuck in the dark ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cjcjc</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66598</link>
		<dc:creator>Cjcjc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66598</guid>
		<description>Even though one of my comments was deleted you did an admirable job of cleaning up after us...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though one of my comments was deleted you did an admirable job of cleaning up after us&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guano</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66596</link>
		<dc:creator>Guano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66596</guid>
		<description>Another important point that has been missed. There are plenty of good reasons to criticise Gordon Brown, and I certainly won&#039;t be voting for him. The smears are crowding out discussion about real issues. I don&#039;t think that that is an accident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another important point that has been missed. There are plenty of good reasons to criticise Gordon Brown, and I certainly won&#8217;t be voting for him. The smears are crowding out discussion about real issues. I don&#8217;t think that that is an accident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66594</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66594</guid>
		<description>&quot;Channel 4 News today exposed this: The man whose blog carried allegations that Prime Minister Gordon Brown was taking anti-depressants has told Channel 4 News he has no proof to support the story.&quot;

Ha, nice try Sunny - but if you read what John said on his blog, you would know that he never claimed to have any proof.  He merely saw a pattern of behaviour / diet that was consistent with taking anti-depressants.  At no point did he suggest categorically that Brown was on anti-depressants, so this Channel 4 nonsense is just a red herring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Channel 4 News today exposed this: The man whose blog carried allegations that Prime Minister Gordon Brown was taking anti-depressants has told Channel 4 News he has no proof to support the story.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ha, nice try Sunny &#8211; but if you read what John said on his blog, you would know that he never claimed to have any proof.  He merely saw a pattern of behaviour / diet that was consistent with taking anti-depressants.  At no point did he suggest categorically that Brown was on anti-depressants, so this Channel 4 nonsense is just a red herring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pagar</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66592</link>
		<dc:creator>pagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66592</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This is probably a losing battle, but I’ve been through this thread and the last to remove some of the more obvious breaches of the comments policy.&lt;/i&gt;

Don, what can I say? You&#039;re a saint, mate.

Thank God I didn&#039;t have to read them............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This is probably a losing battle, but I’ve been through this thread and the last to remove some of the more obvious breaches of the comments policy.</i></p>
<p>Don, what can I say? You&#8217;re a saint, mate.</p>
<p>Thank God I didn&#8217;t have to read them&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Is A Moron</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66590</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Is A Moron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66590</guid>
		<description>On the day of Gordon&#039;s Conference speech, with Labour polling behind the Lib Dems, isn&#039;t this whole attempt to whip up faux-outrage a bit of a waste of time?

I hope Brown&#039;s taken something today to pep him up!

I hear he will try and steal the Tories clothes on law and order. &#039;Tough on crime, tough on criminals&#039; perhaps??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the day of Gordon&#8217;s Conference speech, with Labour polling behind the Lib Dems, isn&#8217;t this whole attempt to whip up faux-outrage a bit of a waste of time?</p>
<p>I hope Brown&#8217;s taken something today to pep him up!</p>
<p>I hear he will try and steal the Tories clothes on law and order. &#8216;Tough on crime, tough on criminals&#8217; perhaps??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gimpy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66589</link>
		<dc:creator>gimpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66589</guid>
		<description>Sunny, IMHO, you&#039;ve rather missed the point.  It&#039;s not about whether or not Brown is on medication, it&#039;s about the stigma mental illness still has and the false belief that depression automatically reduces competence.  Clinical depression in politicians, as in the general population, is not new, not unusual and does not equate to incompetence.  
Politicising health issues of public figures is a pretty scummy way to behave, from left and right alike, and does not really help lift the stigma of illness.

Another thing to bear in mind, and a similar lost point to the above, is that the media covering this, both new and old, consists of people with no qualifications or experience in neuroscience, mental health, pharmacology or any related discipline.  By and large they lack the capacity to report on mental health issues with anything but a sketchy lay understanding.  Proper experts would be unlikely to comment on the mental health of a public figure because their professional ethics forbid it and/or that they lack access to all the facts.  Something that should be borne in mind when reading speculation from all political sides on this.  


Still it&#039;s easier to play politics and continue playground grudges rather than act like grownups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny, IMHO, you&#8217;ve rather missed the point.  It&#8217;s not about whether or not Brown is on medication, it&#8217;s about the stigma mental illness still has and the false belief that depression automatically reduces competence.  Clinical depression in politicians, as in the general population, is not new, not unusual and does not equate to incompetence.<br />
Politicising health issues of public figures is a pretty scummy way to behave, from left and right alike, and does not really help lift the stigma of illness.</p>
<p>Another thing to bear in mind, and a similar lost point to the above, is that the media covering this, both new and old, consists of people with no qualifications or experience in neuroscience, mental health, pharmacology or any related discipline.  By and large they lack the capacity to report on mental health issues with anything but a sketchy lay understanding.  Proper experts would be unlikely to comment on the mental health of a public figure because their professional ethics forbid it and/or that they lack access to all the facts.  Something that should be borne in mind when reading speculation from all political sides on this.  </p>
<p>Still it&#8217;s easier to play politics and continue playground grudges rather than act like grownups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BenSix</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/28/andrew-marr-would-make-damian-mcbride-proud/#comment-66583</link>
		<dc:creator>BenSix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7860#comment-66583</guid>
		<description>Y&#039;know, &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; think Brown&#039;s a bit weird as well, but, unless someone can convince me that Blair and Thatcher were just the kind of average guys you&#039;d find working the 9 to 5 and then holding court in the corner of a pub, I&#039;m going to hold that, generally, people who have the drive, guile and deviousness to run countries are a bit odd (even by &lt;i&gt;human&lt;/i&gt; standards).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;know, <i>I</i> think Brown&#8217;s a bit weird as well, but, unless someone can convince me that Blair and Thatcher were just the kind of average guys you&#8217;d find working the 9 to 5 and then holding court in the corner of a pub, I&#8217;m going to hold that, generally, people who have the drive, guile and deviousness to run countries are a bit odd (even by <i>human</i> standards).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
