How ConHome makes money


by Sunny Hundal    
September 25, 2009 at 3:15 pm

I wrote earlier that ConservativeHome actually has a revenue stream – it’s Conservative Intelligence section.

Writing on the Tribune magazine blog, David Hencke has more:

Conservative Intelligence – whose slogan is “Not Access. Not lobbying. Just Intelligence” – is also run by Mr Montgomerie at ConservativeHome. To get the weekly newsletter costs £1,200 a year, according to the website. Mr Montgmerie says this has now been reduced to £1,000.

To get on the priority list for events organised by Conservative Intelligence to meet Shadow Cabinet ministers such as George Osborne, Michael Gove and Jeremy Hunt will cost another £2,500 a year.

In January, subscribers to the priority list will be offered the chance to see an “unofficial Conservative Party manifesto” and a “draft timetable for a Conservative’s government’s first year” – with plenty of time to try to influence any changes they may want to see.

Mmmm. Any suggestion that events organised to meet shadow cabinet members should be classed as “access” will not be kindly received by them obviously.

Tim Montgomerie tells him: “If you say we are offering general access for people who pay for the newsletter, then I plead guilty. But we are not offering facilities for lobbying. If, say, BAA wanted a meeting with our transport spokesman, we would refuse.”

But what if BAA had corporate people subscribed to the CI list, and they just happened to run into the transport spokesperson at the event?

Tim Montgomerie’s efforts to make money from his highly influential site are laudable – people have to make money somehow I guess.

But isn’t there a conflict of interest if the editor is also trying to introduce people to the very people he writes about? (if there is a strict wall between the two operations then this possibility would be lessened. I’m not aware if this is the case or not – just asking)

At Next Left Sunder Katwala has a suggestion so Montgomerie can show his editorial independence: An unlikely alliance to end big donor politics


---------------------------
     


About the author
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by
Filed under
News


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


Since Con Home is avowedly, openly and deliberately biased. What conflict?

Its not like Con Home is ‘Which magazine’. Then you might have a point. If Which offered ‘impartial’ advice on whats the best washer-dryer, but at the same time made money by selling tickets to met the directors of Bosch then I could see your issue. But Con Home is not impartial or neutral, nor does it claim to be. Nor does it need to be for the model to work

No, I dont see your point.

Since Con Home is avowedly, openly and deliberately biased. What conflict?

Why do I have to explain everything even though it’s up there above? The problem isn’t ConHome’s political bias – everyone is aware of that.

I’m asking: can a site whose revenue stream relies on selling events and intelligence about politicians, and that is dependent on maintaining good relations with them, claim true editorial independence?

It is quite possible, nay even common, for magazines, sites, whatever to be affliated to but separate from organisations on which they comment. An independent supporters fanzine for a particular football team. They get revenue from selling memorabilia, priviliged access to a ticket line etc. But they still critisize the manager.

Yes you can argue that Con Home can not show that they have a theoretical conflict of interest. But as the saying goes, you shall know them by their actions. You will be hard pressed to make a case that Con Home is a complient mouthpiece of the party leadership based on its record to date.

And what about the issue of actually selling access to people like Osborne, effectively for Tory funds?

This just like the kind of dog and pony show the American Right wing have.

It is a giant wing nut welfare circuit for Right wing political apparatchiks

It a giant Wurlitzer machine: Where money comes in from Right wing friendly business people, and that is used to promote right wing propaganda sheets that bring in more money to promote Right wing nonsense spouting think tanks. Round and round it goes. Who knows when the Wurlitzer will stop?

When they are pushing some bullshit , you have to always keep in mind the old adage….. follow the money.

How ConHome makes money?

Selling child slaves, that’s what I’ve heard and nice call Sunny of Dontmindme’s failure to read…again.

@5

“And what about the issue of actually selling access to people like Osborne, effectively for Tory funds?”

Why should one voter get privileged access to an elected representative over another, just because the former has more money? It’s elitist, wholly undemocratic, and offers political influence only to those who can afford it.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF

  2. Phil BC

    RT @libcon Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF [Tories in a cash for access story. What a surprise!]

  3. James Graham

    RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/qfJzN

  4. Adam Bienkov

    RT @libcon Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF <– Cash for access

  5. sunny hundal

    RT @libcon: Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF

  6. Top 5k

    Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF

  7. Adam Bienkov

    "Not access. Not Lobbying." Just access and lobbying http://bit.ly/tP7RF

  8. topsy top20k

    Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF

  9. Liberal Conspiracy

    Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF

  10. Phil BC

    RT @libcon Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF [Tories in a cash for access story. What a surprise!]

  11. James Graham

    RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/qfJzN

  12. Adam Bienkov

    RT @libcon Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF <– Cash for access

  13. Tweets that mention Liberal Conspiracy » How ConHome makes money -- Topsy.com

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal Conspiracy and Phil BC. Phil BC said: RT @libcon Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF [Tories in a cash for access story. What a surprise!] [...]

  14. sunny hundal

    RT @libcon: Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF

  15. Top 5k

    Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF

  16. topsy top20k

    Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




11 Comments



16 Comments



26 Comments



40 Comments



21 Comments



13 Comments



49 Comments



11 Comments



78 Comments



5 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Tyler posted on Barclays was also bailed out - Diamond doesn't deserve a bonus

» Bob B posted on Barclays was also bailed out - Diamond doesn't deserve a bonus

» Bob B posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» michaela gabriel posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Meet My Sweet posted on Ed Miliband tried to persuade against Iraq

» x posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Stuart White posted on Paediatricians Assoc. members slams NHS bill

» Charlieman posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Charlieman posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Cylux posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?

» Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Cylux posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?

» Bob B posted on Ed Mili: We need a new post-Thatcher "settlement" for Britain

» Princess™ ??! posted on Watch: Leaked document shows Tories plan to privatise NHS