How ConHome makes money
I wrote earlier that ConservativeHome actually has a revenue stream – it’s Conservative Intelligence section.
Writing on the Tribune magazine blog, David Hencke has more:
Conservative Intelligence – whose slogan is “Not Access. Not lobbying. Just Intelligence” – is also run by Mr Montgomerie at ConservativeHome. To get the weekly newsletter costs £1,200 a year, according to the website. Mr Montgmerie says this has now been reduced to £1,000.
To get on the priority list for events organised by Conservative Intelligence to meet Shadow Cabinet ministers such as George Osborne, Michael Gove and Jeremy Hunt will cost another £2,500 a year.
In January, subscribers to the priority list will be offered the chance to see an “unofficial Conservative Party manifesto” and a “draft timetable for a Conservative’s government’s first year” – with plenty of time to try to influence any changes they may want to see.
Mmmm. Any suggestion that events organised to meet shadow cabinet members should be classed as “access” will not be kindly received by them obviously.
Tim Montgomerie tells him: “If you say we are offering general access for people who pay for the newsletter, then I plead guilty. But we are not offering facilities for lobbying. If, say, BAA wanted a meeting with our transport spokesman, we would refuse.”
But what if BAA had corporate people subscribed to the CI list, and they just happened to run into the transport spokesperson at the event?
Tim Montgomerie’s efforts to make money from his highly influential site are laudable – people have to make money somehow I guess.
But isn’t there a conflict of interest if the editor is also trying to introduce people to the very people he writes about? (if there is a strict wall between the two operations then this possibility would be lessened. I’m not aware if this is the case or not – just asking)
At Next Left Sunder Katwala has a suggestion so Montgomerie can show his editorial independence: An unlikely alliance to end big donor politics
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Story Filed Under: News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Since Con Home is avowedly, openly and deliberately biased. What conflict?
Its not like Con Home is ‘Which magazine’. Then you might have a point. If Which offered ‘impartial’ advice on whats the best washer-dryer, but at the same time made money by selling tickets to met the directors of Bosch then I could see your issue. But Con Home is not impartial or neutral, nor does it claim to be. Nor does it need to be for the model to work
No, I dont see your point.
Since Con Home is avowedly, openly and deliberately biased. What conflict?
Why do I have to explain everything even though it’s up there above? The problem isn’t ConHome’s political bias – everyone is aware of that.
I’m asking: can a site whose revenue stream relies on selling events and intelligence about politicians, and that is dependent on maintaining good relations with them, claim true editorial independence?
It is quite possible, nay even common, for magazines, sites, whatever to be affliated to but separate from organisations on which they comment. An independent supporters fanzine for a particular football team. They get revenue from selling memorabilia, priviliged access to a ticket line etc. But they still critisize the manager.
Yes you can argue that Con Home can not show that they have a theoretical conflict of interest. But as the saying goes, you shall know them by their actions. You will be hard pressed to make a case that Con Home is a complient mouthpiece of the party leadership based on its record to date.
And what about the issue of actually selling access to people like Osborne, effectively for Tory funds?
This just like the kind of dog and pony show the American Right wing have.
It is a giant wing nut welfare circuit for Right wing political apparatchiks
It a giant Wurlitzer machine: Where money comes in from Right wing friendly business people, and that is used to promote right wing propaganda sheets that bring in more money to promote Right wing nonsense spouting think tanks. Round and round it goes. Who knows when the Wurlitzer will stop?
When they are pushing some bullshit , you have to always keep in mind the old adage….. follow the money.
How ConHome makes money?
Selling child slaves, that’s what I’ve heard and nice call Sunny of Dontmindme’s failure to read…again.
@5
“And what about the issue of actually selling access to people like Osborne, effectively for Tory funds?”
Why should one voter get privileged access to an elected representative over another, just because the former has more money? It’s elitist, wholly undemocratic, and offers political influence only to those who can afford it.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF
- Phil BC
RT @libcon Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF [Tories in a cash for access story. What a surprise!]
- James Graham
RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/qfJzN
- Adam Bienkov
RT @libcon Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF <– Cash for access
- sunny hundal
RT @libcon: Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF
- Top 5k
Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF
- Adam Bienkov
"Not access. Not Lobbying." Just access and lobbying http://bit.ly/tP7RF
- topsy top20k
Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF
- Liberal Conspiracy
Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF
- Phil BC
RT @libcon Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF [Tories in a cash for access story. What a surprise!]
- James Graham
RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/qfJzN
- Adam Bienkov
RT @libcon Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF <– Cash for access
- Tweets that mention Liberal Conspiracy » How ConHome makes money -- Topsy.com
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal Conspiracy and Phil BC. Phil BC said: RT @libcon Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF [Tories in a cash for access story. What a surprise!] [...]
- sunny hundal
RT @libcon: Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF
- Top 5k
Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF
- topsy top20k
Article:: How ConHome makes money http://bit.ly/tP7RF
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
8 Comments 65 Comments 19 Comments 44 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 22 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Ukobserver posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » re posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Cherub posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » GO posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » Frances posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » buddyhell posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Dave posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » GO posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » Man on Clapham Omnibus posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Peter Stewert posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Chaise Guevara posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » Man on Clapham Omnibus posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Robin Levett posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people » Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Unity posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people |










