<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Labour factionalism raises its head again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/12/new-labour-factionalism-raises-its-head-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/12/new-labour-factionalism-raises-its-head-again/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:02:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ad</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/12/new-labour-factionalism-raises-its-head-again/#comment-63929</link>
		<dc:creator>ad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7523#comment-63929</guid>
		<description>If you genuinely believe that X, Y and Z are the right things for the government to do, a political party is merely a tool to be used to make it more likely that the government will do those things. Why is anyone loyal to a tool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you genuinely believe that X, Y and Z are the right things for the government to do, a political party is merely a tool to be used to make it more likely that the government will do those things. Why is anyone loyal to a tool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redpesto</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/12/new-labour-factionalism-raises-its-head-again/#comment-63924</link>
		<dc:creator>redpesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7523#comment-63924</guid>
		<description>Phil &#039;Not the Drummer&#039; Collins has form for this kind thing, as in &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/may/27/labour.gordonbrown&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this report&lt;/A&gt; from the &lt;I&gt;Guardian&lt;/I&gt; from May 2008:

&lt;blockquote&gt;In the clearest sign of the unease among Blair&#039;s supporters, who have kept a low profile since Labour&#039;s defeat in the Crewe and Nantwich byelection, Phil Collins accuses Brown&#039;s circle of placing their faith in the &quot;deep poisoned well&quot; of the leftwing Fabian tradition.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

When the Blair groupies start picking fights with the Fabians, fercrissakes, they really must think everyday it&#039;s 1983, and Michael Foot is still leader of the Labour party. I&#039;ll just add the following to add to Strategist&#039;s point:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Collins indicates that Blairites are becoming increasingly impressed by David Cameron, who attacks Labour for providing centralising &quot;top down&quot; solutions and who pledges instead to empower people. In his article, jointly written with the author Richard Reeves, Collins warns that Cameron and Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, &quot;have got the point&quot;, unlike Brown who finds himself on the wrong side of a new divide in British politics.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil &#8216;Not the Drummer&#8217; Collins has form for this kind thing, as in <a HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/may/27/labour.gordonbrown" rel="nofollow">this report</a> from the <i>Guardian</i> from May 2008:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the clearest sign of the unease among Blair&#8217;s supporters, who have kept a low profile since Labour&#8217;s defeat in the Crewe and Nantwich byelection, Phil Collins accuses Brown&#8217;s circle of placing their faith in the &#8220;deep poisoned well&#8221; of the leftwing Fabian tradition.</p></blockquote>
<p>When the Blair groupies start picking fights with the Fabians, fercrissakes, they really must think everyday it&#8217;s 1983, and Michael Foot is still leader of the Labour party. I&#8217;ll just add the following to add to Strategist&#8217;s point:</p>
<blockquote><p>Collins indicates that Blairites are becoming increasingly impressed by David Cameron, who attacks Labour for providing centralising &#8220;top down&#8221; solutions and who pledges instead to empower people. In his article, jointly written with the author Richard Reeves, Collins warns that Cameron and Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, &#8220;have got the point&#8221;, unlike Brown who finds himself on the wrong side of a new divide in British politics.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strategist</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/12/new-labour-factionalism-raises-its-head-again/#comment-63906</link>
		<dc:creator>Strategist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7523#comment-63906</guid>
		<description>&quot;One of the strangest political trends of the year... This week, Phil ‘not the singer’ Collins, Tony Blair’s former speechwriter and chair of Demos, has a smug article in the Spectator...&quot;

Not strange, absolutely predictable.  Simple preparation for defection to a Tory Party about to win a landslide, shurely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One of the strangest political trends of the year&#8230; This week, Phil ‘not the singer’ Collins, Tony Blair’s former speechwriter and chair of Demos, has a smug article in the Spectator&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Not strange, absolutely predictable.  Simple preparation for defection to a Tory Party about to win a landslide, shurely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burkesworks</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/12/new-labour-factionalism-raises-its-head-again/#comment-63885</link>
		<dc:creator>burkesworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7523#comment-63885</guid>
		<description>Has someone told Paul Richards that those trains of thought stopped running from Euston about three years ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has someone told Paul Richards that those trains of thought stopped running from Euston about three years ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BenSix</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/12/new-labour-factionalism-raises-its-head-again/#comment-63869</link>
		<dc:creator>BenSix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7523#comment-63869</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressonline.org.uk/columns/column.asp?c=263&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here we are, Guano...&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Nick Cohen in What’s Left describes the phenomenon of Guardian-reading left-wingers marching alongside misogynist, homophobic, anti-democrat Islamist right-wingers, united in the cause of wanting to keep Saddam Hussein in power in Iraq. Lenin’s helpful formula ‘useful idiots’ doesn’t even begin to describe it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.progressonline.org.uk/columns/column.asp?c=263" rel="nofollow">Here we are, Guano&#8230;</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Nick Cohen in What’s Left describes the phenomenon of Guardian-reading left-wingers marching alongside misogynist, homophobic, anti-democrat Islamist right-wingers, united in the cause of wanting to keep Saddam Hussein in power in Iraq. Lenin’s helpful formula ‘useful idiots’ doesn’t even begin to describe it.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guano</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/12/new-labour-factionalism-raises-its-head-again/#comment-63866</link>
		<dc:creator>Guano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7523#comment-63866</guid>
		<description>Do you have a link to the remarks by Paul Richards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a link to the remarks by Paul Richards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/09/12/new-labour-factionalism-raises-its-head-again/#comment-75975</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=7523#comment-75975</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Article:: New Labour factionalism raises its head again http://bit.ly/ncKq&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;topsy_trackback_links&quot;&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/libcon/status/3932910903&quot;&gt;Original tweet&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Article:: New Labour factionalism raises its head again <a href="http://bit.ly/ncKq" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ncKq</a></span></p>
<div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/libcon/status/3932910903">Original tweet</a>]</div>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

