One of the strangest political trends of the year has been the Blairites, who dominated British politics for many years, carrying out massive unprovoked attacks on their own reputations and doing their best to annoy and alienate people in the Labour Party.
This is in preparation for their total marginalisation and defeat by Neal Lawson and chums in an internal faction fight after the election. I find this for the most part entertaining, but also somewhat baffling.
Over the summer, most of their leaders resigned from government, so it is left to the second string to keep up the fight for the true cause.
This week, Phil ‘not the singer’ Collins, Tony Blair’s former speechwriter and chair of Demos, has a smug article in the Spectator slagging off the trade unions.
I understand that there is probably some personal benefit in slagging off Labour’s main funders for the benefit of a right-wing audience, but surely this sort of behaviour only hurts the faction which Collins supports?
Or take Hazel Blears’ former special adviser, Paul ‘the Thinker’ Richards, saying that opponents of the Iraq war were pro-Saddam Hussein. It’s not 2003 any more, so what’s with the ‘no compromise with reality’ attitude?
This kind of behaviour almost seems that they’ve given up on the Labour Party, rather than trying to win support for their candidates and policies within the Party by building alliances across the party and in the unions, they are running wild, self-indulgent and free, preparing for life as an occasional columnist in the Times tutting about how the Labour Party has lurched to the left and how it’s not like the Good Old Days when Tony was in charge.
If that’s the case, then I think it is a shame. I disagree with the ideas which the Blairites have about the future of the Labour Party, but the Labour Party will be more effective if Phil-not-the-singer and Paul-the-thinker follow the fine example of Alastair, Hopi and Luke and argue their case forcefully while accepting that their faction won’t always get its way.
| Post to del.icio.us |
Article:: New Labour factionalism raises its head again http://bit.ly/ncKq
Do you have a link to the remarks by Paul Richards?
Nick Cohen in What’s Left describes the phenomenon of Guardian-reading left-wingers marching alongside misogynist, homophobic, anti-democrat Islamist right-wingers, united in the cause of wanting to keep Saddam Hussein in power in Iraq. Lenin’s helpful formula ‘useful idiots’ doesn’t even begin to describe it.
Has someone told Paul Richards that those trains of thought stopped running from Euston about three years ago?
“One of the strangest political trends of the year… This week, Phil ‘not the singer’ Collins, Tony Blair’s former speechwriter and chair of Demos, has a smug article in the Spectator…”
Not strange, absolutely predictable. Simple preparation for defection to a Tory Party about to win a landslide, shurely?
Phil ‘Not the Drummer’ Collins has form for this kind thing, as in this report from the Guardian from May 2008:
In the clearest sign of the unease among Blair’s supporters, who have kept a low profile since Labour’s defeat in the Crewe and Nantwich byelection, Phil Collins accuses Brown’s circle of placing their faith in the “deep poisoned well” of the leftwing Fabian tradition.
When the Blair groupies start picking fights with the Fabians, fercrissakes, they really must think everyday it’s 1983, and Michael Foot is still leader of the Labour party. I’ll just add the following to add to Strategist’s point:
Collins indicates that Blairites are becoming increasingly impressed by David Cameron, who attacks Labour for providing centralising “top down” solutions and who pledges instead to empower people. In his article, jointly written with the author Richard Reeves, Collins warns that Cameron and Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, “have got the point”, unlike Brown who finds himself on the wrong side of a new divide in British politics.
Nuff said.
If you genuinely believe that X, Y and Z are the right things for the government to do, a political party is merely a tool to be used to make it more likely that the government will do those things. Why is anyone loyal to a tool?
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
| 8 Comments 18 Comments 15 Comments 20 Comments 10 Comments 26 Comments 57 Comments 67 Comments 2 Comments 49 Comments | LATEST COMMENTS » crusade posted on Against multiculturalism » 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism » 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism » ukliberty posted on Vote Pirate Party » ukliberty posted on Vote Pirate Party » Thebee posted on Tories offer state funding to schools linked to 'occult society' » Just Visiting posted on Against multiculturalism » Just Visiting posted on Against multiculturalism » Matt Munro posted on Vote Pirate Party » Thebee posted on Tories offer state funding to schools linked to 'occult society' » Daniel Hoffmann-Gill posted on Contra Stimulus! » Friend posted on Dizzy in a tizzy over MP's invoice » 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism » Lee Griffin posted on Against multiculturalism » Lee Griffin posted on Against multiculturalism Last 50 // Comments feed |