David Cameron’s charm offensive has failed to attract new members to the Tories – or keep hold of tens of thousands of people who were already in the party when he arrived.
Local Conservative parties have lost almost a quarter of their rank-and-file members since Mr Cameron took over in late 2005.
Although the Tories have enjoyed a huge opinion-poll lead for several months, they have not been able to translate the surge in popularity into an increase in membership on the scale experienced by Labour during Tony Blair’s early years in charge.
The total membership in more than 200 constituency associations – barely a third of the overall number – who provided relevant figures to the elections watchdog fell from 185,000 to 145,000 between December 2005 and December 2008. The constituencies experiencing falls include “safe” seats, the bases of shadow Cabinet members and target seats that must be taken if the Tories are to win the next general election.
| Post to del.icio.us |
: Tories lose quarter of members since Cameron http://bit.ly/1ZPkg
Liberal Conspiracy » Tories lose quarter of members since Cameron- Tweets that mention Liberal Conspiracy » B… http://bit.ly/1g1Rqq
: Tories lose quarter of members since Cameron http://bit.ly/1ZPkg
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by . said: [...]
Did Blair have an expenses scandal? No.
Is membership across the top three parties going down? Yes.
I really don’t understand the point you’re trying to make, unless you’re taking the story out of context.
It makes sense that old fashioned Tories will feel less affinity with Cameron’s party.
And that people will still vote for them even if they no longer feel so enthusiastic about becoming members.
Many of the blue rinse ladies who used to cheer Maggie at conference must be dead by now.
Who would want to join a party that George Osborne was a leading spokesman for?
Where have they all gone?
UKIP? BNP? Women’s Institute?
Only a quarter? Cameron is doing well by comparison.
Between the general elections in 1997 and 2005, Blair lost almost 4 million votes and half the membership of the Labour Party.
In the 2005 election, more of the electorate didn’t vote than the number who voted for Labour candidates.
Er…Bob, you’re taking an 8 year window instead of a four year window and you’re skipping an election.
Oh dear.
Daniel Hoffmann-Gill Can you add up? See my blog and learn how to add up.
Fuck off spammer.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
| 8 Comments 11 Comments 14 Comments 9 Comments 24 Comments 49 Comments 67 Comments 2 Comments 47 Comments 9 Comments | LATEST COMMENTS » Liberal Conspiracy » Data abuse posted on Fabians fail the Fairness Test » 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism » Rob posted on A Song for Cameron » SimonG posted on DNA Sampling: Wrong in principle, wrong in practice » John Q. Publican posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » SimonG posted on Choose your scumbag of the week » zooey posted on Tories offer state funding to schools linked to 'occult society' » Unity posted on A Song for Cameron » Dunc posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Larry Teabag posted on A Song for Cameron » Dan | thesamovar posted on What brain scans can't teach us » John Q. Publican posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Golden Gordon posted on Tories offer state funding to schools linked to 'occult society' » John Q. Publican posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Watchman posted on Tory grassroots split over North Korea Last 50 // Comments feed |