Published: August 24th 2009 - at 1:51 pm

Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police


by Chris Barnyard    

Organisers of Climate Camp, due to start this week from Wednesday, have issued an open letter to the Met Police.

Watch the video below or read the text.

Open Letter to the Met

Open Letter
FAO Chief Superintendent Ian Thomas,
New Scotland Yard
London SW1H 0BG

Dear Chief Superintendent Thomas,

On August 17th, you wrote to the Camp for Climate Action, requesting further information on the location of our next Camp, which will take place from August 27th to September 2nd, somewhere in the London area. You say that you require this information in order to help with “community liaison”, to ensure the Camp is a “safe and healthy” event, and to help you put a “pre-planned and proportionate policing operation” in place. We are writing this open letter in order to alleviate your concerns, and to make our position clear both to yourself and to the public.

Community liaison has been a vital part of every Climate Camp. At Drax in 2006, Heathrow in 2007 and Kingsnorth in 2008, we put a lot of time and effort into spending time with local residents and allaying people’s concerns, and this year will be no different. We have a good track record of building community support for the Camp and for climate change campaigning, we’ve already been in touch with local Councils across London, and our friendly outreach volunteers will be chatting to the locals from the moment we arrive on site. We plan to be excellent neighbours for as long as we’re there, we’ll be open and welcoming to any local residents with questions or concerns, and we’ll leave the site spotless when it’s time to go.

As regards health and safety – thanks for your concern, but again we’ve got it under control. As with previous Camps, we’ll have great food, water, compost toilets, a team of medics, a wellbeing space, excellent on-site communication, emergency vehicle access, and a family space. We also have a “Safer Spaces” policy and a “Tranquillity Team” to help keep the site free from oppressive behaviour or aggro. Anyone who’s spent time at past Camps will tell you how friendly and safe the atmosphere is – better than most mainstream festivals.

Of course, there is one unfortunate exception to all of this. While most visitors to previous Camps have had an inspiring and positive experience, some of us have had to suffer violence, intimidation, theft, sleep deprivation and harassment, thanks to past examples of “pre-planned and proportionate policing operations”. Local communities have been disrupted by police road closures and indiscriminate stops-and-searches. Members of the public have been attacked with batons or arrested on trumped-up charges simply for standing on the perimeter of a campsite (nearly all of them have now been acquitted or had their charges dropped). Judging from past experience, the best thing the police could do to ensure the health and safety of the public at Climate Camp 2009 would be to stay as far away from it as possible.

Bearing all of this in mind, I hope that you, and the public, understand why we don’t feel able to reveal the precise location of the Camp at this time. Every other aspect of the Camp has been organised in an open, accountable and democratic way, via monthly public meetings. The only secret is the location. There’s a simple reason for this: I’m afraid we just don’t trust the police. Why? Because it seems as though every time we have a protest, the police turn up and start hitting people. Look what happened at the G20. That’s not really a very good way to win people over.

Just because you’ve started using friendlier language and talking about “lighter-touch” policing, do you really think we’re suddenly going to believe you’re our friends? Just a few weeks back the Big Green Gathering was shut down by the police on spurious grounds, for “political” reasons. If the police are really trying to build up trust within the climate action movement, then that’s a funny way to go about it.

The precise location of the Camp for Climate Action 2009 will be announced via mass text as part of the exciting August 26th “Swoop”. I’m afraid you’ll just have to sign up on our website, and wait for the updates just like everybody else!

Yours sincerely,

The Camp for Climate Action Media Team

via The Daily (Maybe)

Update: Swoop locations now revealed


---------------------------
    Share on Tumblr  


About the author
Chris is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He is an aspiring journalist and reports stories for LC.
· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: News


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


Nicely done.

“The public no longer seem to trust us!”

No? Really, officer? Why on earth would that be? Do you think?

“Judging from past experience, the best thing the police could do to ensure the health and safety of the public at Climate Camp 2009 would be to stay as far away from it as possible.”

Great line, and great letter.

I hope no wasps injure the police this year.

Heh. Smacked it.
I’ve also now corrected the bad links in the letter.

5. Shatterface

A good letter, well argued but with the appropriate level of sarcasm. I’d have been inclined to be ruder.

Today’s Times:

Representatives of Climate Camp have been in talks with the police but the group’s organisers refuse to disclose the location because they fear the police will attempt to disrupt their plans.

That sense of mistrust is echoed by many members of the public, according to an opinion poll published yesterday by Christian Aid. The YouGov survey of 2,188 adults found that 50 per cent believe the police are too heavy-handed when dealing with protests and 18 per cent said that they had been put off protesting by police tactics.

Ukliberty quoting the times:

The YouGov survey of 2,188 adults found that 50 per cent believe the police are too heavy-handed when dealing with protests and 18 per cent said that they had been put off protesting by police tactics.

Oh dear. I wish there wasn’t a statistic for that.

Somewhere in a room in Whitehall serious men (they may let women do Gold and Silver commands but this decision will be being made by men, I’m fairly sure) a conversation is being had.

“18%? 18%!? That’s just not good enough, Commissioner. Your target was 50%. Intimidation can’t stop dissent if only 18% of the country are scared of your tactics. Get it together!”


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    : Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police http://bit.ly/3J0H9b

  2. Mark Taylor

    Shared item: Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police: Organisers of Climate Camp, due to start .. http://tinyurl.com/n26yqp

  3. anotherwhitemug.com

    Liberal Conspiracy » Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police- More about us here. You can read articles t… http://bit.ly/198v1n

  4. Alan Thomas

    RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police http://bit.ly/1X3qf – sad when the police lose public faith

  5. Socket

    RT @libcon: : Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police http://bit.ly/3J0H9b

  6. Liberal Conspiracy

    : Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police http://bit.ly/3J0H9b

  7. Mark Taylor

    Shared item: Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police: Organisers of Climate Camp, due to start .. http://tinyurl.com/n26yqp

  8. anotherwhitemug.com

    Liberal Conspiracy » Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police- More about us here. You can read articles t… http://bit.ly/198v1n

  9. Alan Thomas

    RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police http://bit.ly/1X3qf – sad when the police lose public faith





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
LATEST COMMENT PIECES
» Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS






13 Comments



67 Comments



19 Comments



45 Comments



10 Comments



24 Comments



22 Comments



69 Comments



44 Comments



25 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Tom (iow) posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right

» Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» Chaise Guevara posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?

» re posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» Callum Lane posted on Three reasons we should oppose attempts to block porn

» Jonathan Kent posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Robin Levett posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right

» Kath posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» john77 posted on Angry about absurdly high pay? Here's what to do about it

» Monglor posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan

» Sarah AB posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» Peter Stewert posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» Women have the power to end Domestic Violence. | Feminist Prose. posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem

» GO posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?

» john b posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people