The police and their tasers
The latest figures released on the use of tasers by police forces across the country are starting to look concerning. While the jump from 187 uses between October to December 2008 to 250 during January to March this year can be explained by how the Home Office allowed Chief Officers to decide when “specially-trained” units can be deployed with the weapons, it doesn’t explain why different forces are using them far more readily than others.
The most startling are the number of uses by Northumbria police, which since April 2004 has used tasers in one way or another on 704 occasions, 4 more than even the Met has. This is an astounding number, especially when compared to another force of similar size and with a similar urban environment, Merseyside, who also took part in the same trial as Northumbria and which has used them just 76 times in total.
One explanation might that more units were trained in their use than in the other forces, but Northumbria’s use still seems to be remarkably high. Northumbria claim that their use is highest because they’re the only force to train firearm response officers to also use them, and that the rise would correspond with the drop in firearm officers being deployed, in contrast to other forces, but it also makes you wonder whether because officers know this they more readily call for help when faced with problems they would have dealt with themselves before.
Only the Met and West Yorkshire actually fully “discharged”, as in fired rather than threatened their use or pressed the weapon up against the person on more occasions.
The biggest worry with the use of tasers has to be that when the police would previously have reasoned extensively to subdue someone who was uncooperative with them, or used acceptable, if subjective force to achieve the same result, the weapon becomes the first resort rather than the last, even if used just simply as a threat.
Unlike in the US, where the Taser was meant to be deployed as an alternative to firearms (even if, somewhat predictably, no such fall in the use of guns seems to have been noted), police in this country have only ever used guns when the suspect is also believed to have or has used one. That tasers seem to be entering normal police use, and that as a result, their use also becomes to be seen as normal is a cause for concern when the safety of the weapons is far from being certain.
As this recent Guardian leader argues, the exact circumstances of their use, as well as how they were used needs to be recorded to ensure that the above doesn’t become the norm.
The police blogger Nightjack wrote that most police were approachable and pleasant, it was just that they had started to dress and be armed like “imperial stormtroopers” which worried and put the general public off. The casual deployment of tasers would only make such attitudes worse.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
'Septicisle' is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He mostly blogs, poorly, over at Septicisle.info on politics and general media mendacity.
· Other posts by Septicisle
Filed under
Blog ,Civil liberties ,Crime
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
I remember when refering to the police as ‘shock troopers’ was hyperbole.
At least we’ve not reached American standards of Taser use, where they are now using them to sodomise people and placing them on people’s genitals.
http://carlosmiller.com/2009/07/23/idaho-police-sodomize-man-with-taser/
‘At least we’ve not reached American standards of Taser use, where they are now using them to sodomise people and placing them on people’s genitals.’
What people get up to in the privacy of their own homes is no one else’s business.
Unfortunately, it is what the police are doing.
There is also a site called taserporn which collects vids of people being tasered.
Cool.
Hmmm – If we imagine a spectrum of force available to an officer, ranging from reasoned discussion to shooting dead, with that ridiculously ineffective police kung fu stuff, pava spray, baton and tazer in between, were do you expect tazer to be placed?
Home office puts it just after the fisty cuffs, and before spray and baton. I would say that is the right place. It is not a last resort
Having a silly, scrappy fight hurts both people involved, and will result in scrapes and bruises and sore bits that will last for days at least. Being shot with a tazer will be over in seconds, leaving you with two little bee stings.
Those who are more vulnerable, with weak hearts etc, are just as likely to suffer badly when having a prolonged wrestle with three officers, or suffering the effcets of pava for 30 mins.
Policing has always been violent. It is not pretty, but the police are more restrained and more likely to spend Kafka-esque lengths of time trying to reason with the un-reasonable than ever before. For an organization that spends the majority of its time forcing people to do things against their will, nasty looking violence will always play a large role in their business, like it or not. Tazer looks bloody awfull, but is far less damaging than a hard it with a baton, or even a punch in the chops. We should continue to be squeamish about, but we should not prevent the police from using a tool that will save everybody from more serious injury.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
: The police and their tasers http://bit.ly/2u8GGq
- Twitter Trackbacks for Liberal Conspiracy » The police and their tasers [liberalconspiracy.org] on Topsy.com
[...] Liberal Conspiracy » The police and their tasers http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/21/the-police-and-their-tasers – view page – cached #RSS 2.0 RSS .92 Atom 0.3 Liberal Conspiracy » The police and their tasers Comments Feed Liberal Conspiracy Why I’m joining the Conspiracy Top Stories – Friday 21st August — From the page [...]
- The police and their tasers
[...] Read full article > linkscolor = "000000"; highlightscolor = "888888"; backgroundcolor = "FFFFFF"; channel = "none"; Easy AdSense by Unreal [...]
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Why Quantitative Easing doesn’t make common sense
» Barclays was also bailed out – Diamond doesn’t deserve a bonus
» Ten myths about private rented housing
» Even on the left, morality has its limits
» The NHS bill could be a Waterloo moment for the govt
» Ken Livingstone and gay rights – it just isn’t an issue
» Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?
» New study shows a Robinhood tax would boost growth
» In defence of Sky News’ re-Tweeting ban
» Another reason to continue banker bashing
» An attack on the wind industry is an attack on UK jobs
|
14 Comments 17 Comments 26 Comments 42 Comments 21 Comments 13 Comments 49 Comments 11 Comments 78 Comments 5 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » kernowjim posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » ROFLMFAO posted on Fabians change policy on unpaid internships » Cherub posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » jojo posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction » Sun journos nicked in hack enquiry shocker « andrew henley posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction » Daniel Factor posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » UKFI Not FFP posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Spike1138 posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles? » Bren Cook posted on New study shows a Robinhood tax would boost growth » Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Tricia McDaid posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction » Edward Buxton posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction » Rich posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction » ll_bazwaldo posted on Paediatricians Assoc. members slams NHS bill |









