<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CCTV in every home? Not likely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Jungle</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-77145</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Jungle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-77145</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @ieatfog  @CosyPhil @ieatfog CCTV in peoples homes story from yesterday is not true (thank God) http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;topsy_trackback_links&quot;&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/techjungle/status/3984579105&quot;&gt;Original tweet&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @ieatfog  @CosyPhil @ieatfog CCTV in peoples homes story from yesterday is not true (thank God) <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud</a></span></p>
<div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/techjungle/status/3984579105">Original tweet</a>]</div>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quietzapple</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-60688</link>
		<dc:creator>Quietzapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-60688</guid>
		<description>Funnnnnyyy how some think that billionaires lying is ok if it is (as it almost always is) anti Labour . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funnnnnyyy how some think that billionaires lying is ok if it is (as it almost always is) anti Labour . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alarma</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-60682</link>
		<dc:creator>alarma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-60682</guid>
		<description>more cameras more video</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more cameras more video</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waypasthadenough</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-58399</link>
		<dc:creator>waypasthadenough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-58399</guid>
		<description>When the stupid Brits turned their personal weapons into their government without killing their &quot;Liberals&quot; they became slaves. All evil that happens after that they fully deserve. 

Don&#039;t understand? Start here: 

http://willowtown.com/promo/quotes.htm

And don&#039;t miss what the insane brits are doing to themselves: 

http://willowtown.com/reality/britsinsane.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the stupid Brits turned their personal weapons into their government without killing their &#8220;Liberals&#8221; they became slaves. All evil that happens after that they fully deserve. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t understand? Start here: </p>
<p><a href="http://willowtown.com/promo/quotes.htm" rel="nofollow">http://willowtown.com/promo/quotes.htm</a></p>
<p>And don&#8217;t miss what the insane brits are doing to themselves: </p>
<p><a href="http://willowtown.com/reality/britsinsane.htm" rel="nofollow">http://willowtown.com/reality/britsinsane.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quietzapple</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57625</link>
		<dc:creator>Quietzapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 04:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57625</guid>
		<description>So Lord Ashcroft tells me, Alex . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Lord Ashcroft tells me, Alex . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57623</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57623</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s unclear where the Sunday Express got the idea that families were to be put under 24 hours CCTV surveillance. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

George Orwell perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s unclear where the Sunday Express got the idea that families were to be put under 24 hours CCTV surveillance. </p></blockquote>
<p>George Orwell perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quietzapple</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57541</link>
		<dc:creator>Quietzapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57541</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be silly . . .

A lively tendentious imagination is about half the requirement for a journo working for Desmond, the nearly and wanna be billionaire owner of what once was called the Daily Get-much-worse.

Now it has, the nomenclature has been overrun too far by reality I suppose. &quot;Got-much-worse&quot;?

They ALL wanna be like the Dully Tele and be on the Beeb:

http://quietzapples.blogspot.com/2009/05/thrice-dully-tele-campaign-of-tory.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be silly . . .</p>
<p>A lively tendentious imagination is about half the requirement for a journo working for Desmond, the nearly and wanna be billionaire owner of what once was called the Daily Get-much-worse.</p>
<p>Now it has, the nomenclature has been overrun too far by reality I suppose. &#8220;Got-much-worse&#8221;?</p>
<p>They ALL wanna be like the Dully Tele and be on the Beeb:</p>
<p><a href="http://quietzapples.blogspot.com/2009/05/thrice-dully-tele-campaign-of-tory.html" rel="nofollow">http://quietzapples.blogspot.com/2009/05/thrice-dully-tele-campaign-of-tory.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisdair Cameron</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57282</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisdair Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57282</guid>
		<description>@ Johnbax. &lt;i&gt;Where&lt;/i&gt; did I say there was such an announcement? &lt;b&gt;Read&lt;/b&gt; what I wrote: I called &lt;b&gt;both&lt;/b&gt; the Express and Balls liars. The Express, as you seem to agree, has acquired a reputation for unreliability and being proof-free for stories. Balls has an almost equal reputation, and is a liar (evidenced &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/3725688/talking-balls.thtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;  and also in more general terms by tens of thousands of teachers). My point is that the very idea even floating around the DCMS and Govt in any form,(which it &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt;, see the Respect document which speaks of units where families will have to live which will have &quot;24-hour support and supervision&quot;: 24hr &lt;i&gt;manned supervision?&lt;/i&gt; . Such surveillance as a means of overt social control, without proper and sufficient legal process, as outlined in the document &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; hugely scary.Balls and his department love to look tough, with such gimcrack measure, yet he particularly, via his disastrous stint at the Treasury, is one of the architects of the situations that created social unrest, namely his deliberate fostering of the chasm in incomes in the UK. His solution? Authoritarianism, the bypassing of legal process, and the reduction of rights, while his rich pals skip along merrily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Johnbax. <i>Where</i> did I say there was such an announcement? <b>Read</b> what I wrote: I called <b>both</b> the Express and Balls liars. The Express, as you seem to agree, has acquired a reputation for unreliability and being proof-free for stories. Balls has an almost equal reputation, and is a liar (evidenced <a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/3725688/talking-balls.thtml" rel="nofollow">here</a>  and also in more general terms by tens of thousands of teachers). My point is that the very idea even floating around the DCMS and Govt in any form,(which it <b>is</b>, see the Respect document which speaks of units where families will have to live which will have &#8220;24-hour support and supervision&#8221;: 24hr <i>manned supervision?</i> . Such surveillance as a means of overt social control, without proper and sufficient legal process, as outlined in the document <b>is</b> hugely scary.Balls and his department love to look tough, with such gimcrack measure, yet he particularly, via his disastrous stint at the Treasury, is one of the architects of the situations that created social unrest, namely his deliberate fostering of the chasm in incomes in the UK. His solution? Authoritarianism, the bypassing of legal process, and the reduction of rights, while his rich pals skip along merrily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnbax</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57277</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57277</guid>
		<description>What is most disturbing about this story is that if you Google it you will find it all over the web, and all on the basis of one sentence in one report in Britain&#039;s least reliable newspaper.  Alisdair Cameron is wrong - the Express didn&#039;t say it was a secret plan, or a rumour, they said Balls had &#039;announced&#039; it, publicly.  There was no such announcement.  If you think there was, and Balls is lying about it, where&#039;s your evidence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is most disturbing about this story is that if you Google it you will find it all over the web, and all on the basis of one sentence in one report in Britain&#8217;s least reliable newspaper.  Alisdair Cameron is wrong &#8211; the Express didn&#8217;t say it was a secret plan, or a rumour, they said Balls had &#8216;announced&#8217; it, publicly.  There was no such announcement.  If you think there was, and Balls is lying about it, where&#8217;s your evidence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57272</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57272</guid>
		<description>The argument is well rehearsed: it is a combination of proactive crime prevention and &#039;prison works&#039;.  Obviously if delinquents can be locked up before they commit their crimes, then any surveillance is justified.  Or so I have inferred from successive home secretaries.  

Call it a pre-emptive strike, but you do not have to hack into the microphone and camera on the laptops of Blunkett, Straw and Smith to know this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument is well rehearsed: it is a combination of proactive crime prevention and &#8216;prison works&#8217;.  Obviously if delinquents can be locked up before they commit their crimes, then any surveillance is justified.  Or so I have inferred from successive home secretaries.  </p>
<p>Call it a pre-emptive strike, but you do not have to hack into the microphone and camera on the laptops of Blunkett, Straw and Smith to know this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunny hundal</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-77146</link>
		<dc:creator>sunny hundal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-77146</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;&quot;CCTV in every home Not likely&quot; - @KerryMP  @edballsmp  http://is.gd/23Fdt&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;topsy_trackback_links&quot;&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/pickledpolitics/status/3144688890&quot;&gt;Original tweet&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">&quot;CCTV in every home Not likely&quot; &#8211; @KerryMP  @edballsmp  <a href="http://is.gd/23Fdt" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/23Fdt</a></span></p>
<div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/pickledpolitics/status/3144688890">Original tweet</a>]</div>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul S</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57223</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57223</guid>
		<description>&quot;Odds are it was a speculative idea, that somebody genuinely floated round the Dept. &quot;

Aye, and which was then leaked to gauge reaction.

If the Express had said &quot;What a great idea!&quot; then this would probably already be policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Odds are it was a speculative idea, that somebody genuinely floated round the Dept. &#8221;</p>
<p>Aye, and which was then leaked to gauge reaction.</p>
<p>If the Express had said &#8220;What a great idea!&#8221; then this would probably already be policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatterface</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57220</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatterface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57220</guid>
		<description>The Express may have jumped the gun but 12 years of a Government dedicated to abolishing privacy and dignity has demonstrated that whatever CAN be done will be done, eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Express may have jumped the gun but 12 years of a Government dedicated to abolishing privacy and dignity has demonstrated that whatever CAN be done will be done, eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-77147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-77147</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT: @CosyPhil: @ieatfog CCTV in peoples homes story from yesterday is not true (thank God) http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;topsy_trackback_links&quot;&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ieatfog/status/3143924929&quot;&gt;Original tweet&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT: @CosyPhil: @ieatfog CCTV in peoples homes story from yesterday is not true (thank God) <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud</a></span></p>
<div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/ieatfog/status/3143924929">Original tweet</a>]</div>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George V</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57211</link>
		<dc:creator>George V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57211</guid>
		<description>Having read what the Express said and what Balls&#039; department is saying, it is fairly clear that the Express did indeed mis-represent this. But what I still don&#039;t understand is whether this is punishment or treatment.

Are families being offered help which can be refused or is the FIP mandatory or is it somewhere in between?

It sounds as though this is being set up as an option but where the only other option available is eviction. And the two are not necessarily exclusive. Moreover, does this apply only to social housing tenants or can private tenants be forced into these units.

If whole families are being coerced into residential units (for how long exactly) without any of them being convicted then this deserves the scrutiny that it only seems to have got as a result of the Express&#039; erroneous reporting. 

I&#039;m not dismissing this out of hand but this looks like a further example of justice being removed from the courts and placed in the hands of Council officers and social workers. There is also the question of whether - if it is indeed punishment - it could be construed as collective punishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read what the Express said and what Balls&#8217; department is saying, it is fairly clear that the Express did indeed mis-represent this. But what I still don&#8217;t understand is whether this is punishment or treatment.</p>
<p>Are families being offered help which can be refused or is the FIP mandatory or is it somewhere in between?</p>
<p>It sounds as though this is being set up as an option but where the only other option available is eviction. And the two are not necessarily exclusive. Moreover, does this apply only to social housing tenants or can private tenants be forced into these units.</p>
<p>If whole families are being coerced into residential units (for how long exactly) without any of them being convicted then this deserves the scrutiny that it only seems to have got as a result of the Express&#8217; erroneous reporting. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not dismissing this out of hand but this looks like a further example of justice being removed from the courts and placed in the hands of Council officers and social workers. There is also the question of whether &#8211; if it is indeed punishment &#8211; it could be construed as collective punishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte Gore</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57204</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57204</guid>
		<description>Families can be moved into special units where they&#039;re put under 24 hour surveillance. That&#039;s part of the FIP programme for families that have found themselves excluded from Local Authority housing thanks to Antisocial Behaviour. Full information about the project is available from Government websites accessible to all. 

The Express has mixed things up a bit to create a sensationalist story. 

Ed Balls said it was &#039;nonsense&#039; which isn&#039;t quite the same thing as a denial. It may well be true that the program is going to get a huge boost to funding. It&#039;s just not true they&#039;re putting CCTV in people&#039;s homes - they&#039;ve already got special &#039;units&#039; for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Families can be moved into special units where they&#8217;re put under 24 hour surveillance. That&#8217;s part of the FIP programme for families that have found themselves excluded from Local Authority housing thanks to Antisocial Behaviour. Full information about the project is available from Government websites accessible to all. </p>
<p>The Express has mixed things up a bit to create a sensationalist story. </p>
<p>Ed Balls said it was &#8216;nonsense&#8217; which isn&#8217;t quite the same thing as a denial. It may well be true that the program is going to get a huge boost to funding. It&#8217;s just not true they&#8217;re putting CCTV in people&#8217;s homes &#8211; they&#8217;ve already got special &#8216;units&#8217; for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Baker</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-77148</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-77148</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@ieatfog CCTV in peoples homes story from yesterday is not true (thank God) http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;topsy_trackback_links&quot;&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/cosyphil/status/3143423275&quot;&gt;Original tweet&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@ieatfog CCTV in peoples homes story from yesterday is not true (thank God) <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud</a></span></p>
<div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/cosyphil/status/3143423275">Original tweet</a>]</div>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisdair Cameron</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57186</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisdair Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57186</guid>
		<description>Who to believe?
The Express or Ed Balls? Liar or liar?
Odds are it was a speculative idea, that somebody genuinely floated round the Dept. The fact that someone can even suggest it is scary. The fact that the Express can report this as policy is scary. Ed Balls is &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who to believe?<br />
The Express or Ed Balls? Liar or liar?<br />
Odds are it was a speculative idea, that somebody genuinely floated round the Dept. The fact that someone can even suggest it is scary. The fact that the Express can report this as policy is scary. Ed Balls is <i>very</i> scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Houston CCTV</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-77149</link>
		<dc:creator>Houston CCTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-77149</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;CCTV in every home Not likely : Liberal Conspiracy: And then: &quot;It&#039;s the same project The first comment on .. http://bit.ly/Jpuyn&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;topsy_trackback_links&quot;&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/houstoncctv/status/3141717798&quot;&gt;Original tweet&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">CCTV in every home Not likely : Liberal Conspiracy: And then: &quot;It&#8217;s the same project The first comment on .. <a href="http://bit.ly/Jpuyn" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Jpuyn</a></span></p>
<div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/houstoncctv/status/3141717798">Original tweet</a>]</div>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunny hundal</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-78780</link>
		<dc:creator>sunny hundal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-78780</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;&quot;CCTV in every home Not likely&quot; - @KerryMP  @edballsmp  http://is.gd/23Fdt&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">&quot;CCTV in every home Not likely&quot; &#8211; @KerryMP  @edballsmp  <a href="http://is.gd/23Fdt" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/23Fdt</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-57160</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-57160</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In other words the government has launched a Family Intervention project which is currently being trialled in Bristol. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

And which will be cut under the Tories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In other words the government has launched a Family Intervention project which is currently being trialled in Bristol. </p></blockquote>
<p>And which will be cut under the Tories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anotherwhitemug.com</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-77150</link>
		<dc:creator>anotherwhitemug.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-77150</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Liberal Conspiracy » CCTV in every home Not likely &#124; creating a ...- Michael Treacy posted on The BNP&#039;... http://bit.ly/yv2mQ&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;topsy_trackback_links&quot;&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/anotherwhitemug/status/3139979685&quot;&gt;Original tweet&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Liberal Conspiracy » CCTV in every home Not likely | creating a &#8230;- Michael Treacy posted on The BNP&#8217;&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/yv2mQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/yv2mQ</a></span></p>
<div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/anotherwhitemug/status/3139979685">Original tweet</a>]</div>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-78990</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 04:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-78990</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT: @CosyPhil: @ieatfog CCTV in peoples homes story from yesterday is not true (thank God) http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT: @CosyPhil: @ieatfog CCTV in peoples homes story from yesterday is not true (thank God) <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nx83ud</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-77151</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 04:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-77151</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;: CCTV in every home? Not likely http://bit.ly/kEMvj&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;topsy_trackback_links&quot;&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/libcon/status/3138952950&quot;&gt;Original tweet&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">: CCTV in every home? Not likely <a href="http://bit.ly/kEMvj" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/kEMvj</a></span></p>
<div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/libcon/status/3138952950">Original tweet</a>]</div>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/08/05/cctv-in-every-home-not-likely/#comment-77152</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 04:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6670#comment-77152</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;: CCTV in every home Not likely http://bit.ly/kEMvj&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;topsy_trackback_links&quot;&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/libcon/status/3138952950&quot;&gt;Original tweet&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">: CCTV in every home Not likely <a href="http://bit.ly/kEMvj" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/kEMvj</a></span></p>
<div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/libcon/status/3138952950">Original tweet</a>]</div>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

