The reason I welcomed Coulson is because Steve Hilton’s touch feely stuff was all very well, but those posh boys and girls at CCHQ needed an Essex boy to give Labour a good kicking. I actually have spelt out what I thought needed to be done at length in January 08. Coulson was the one to do it:

Finishing the Project : Making 2008 Dangerous for Brown
http://order-order.com/2008/01/06/making-2008-dangerous-for-brown/

Incidentally I like and defend Kelvin MacKenzie – I don’t recall having met him either.

If you want to believe I’m somebody’s puppet suit yourself. If you knew me you’d know the idea that I could be controlled is laughable, I don’t even have self-control.

I’m off on my holidays. Bye.

And if anything, I’m not moving the goalposts, I’m simply buying myself a place in this Westminster drink mashup as the kids say these days!!

There are several psychological terms for what goes on on this blog sometimes.

I don’t know him. Therefore the charge of hypocrisy on that basis is false.

Now if you want to disagree with me about the Guardian that is entirely different. But it isn’t hypocrisy, it is a difference of opinion.

In fact, the efforts you and the other Tory bloggers went to in order to try and blame the Guardian for overcooking this scandal, shows that there is a worse problem than the strategic quietness of lobby journos – as pointed out by Andrew Rawnsley, referred to in my entry above. I note that I cannot prove that you know Coulson, but given your loyalty to him on your blog (and your bubblegum-politics similarities) I, and others, do smell a rat.

The only problem with your analysis is the fundamental premise as defined by you. Since I don’t know Andy Coulson, have never spoken with him, never had a drink with him, never emailed him and never had my voicemail hacked by him, I can hardly be constrained by a non-existent relationship.

This “hypocritical” relationship only exists in your imagination.

But why speculate?

The boy king will be in power in 12 months’ time and we’ll see how he (Guido that is) performs, won’t we?

A knighthood is assured for services to the Conservative party. I wonder if you will wear a disguise when you go to receive it, knowing how you like to keep a low profile.

As you may imagine, I would say the same about the pictures and words written about me on your site.
Anyway, you poor dear – didn’t know you’d get so upset when someone pointed out how partisan you’re becoming these days. I thought your prided yourself on it.

Neither do I know, or imagine I know Sunny, I’ve only spoken to him in short emails a couple of times, and I’ve certainly never met him. End quote.

And I suppose, as it was questioned earlier, if a Tory government were to win come next elections, would your priorities still be with anti-politicians in general, even if that meant busting the heads of mates? Blogs kind of lend themselves to bashing incumbents, will yours follow suit? Because, as a wild guess and prediction, I’d be tempted to say probably not.

Lol. The Labour party were actually acting as a Tory party but aaanyways, lets pretend that ‘New’ Labour was really about ‘society’ etc etc.

Anyways, we need the clueless Tory party with their neo-con views to come into power create a shock awe kind of disaster, then people can finally get it through their dense and complacents asses that the Tory party should be the minority party as it has NO interest at all in how a realistic society should be governed.

Why you getting so defensive? Chill out man!