<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I won&#8217;t vote Conservative in Norwich North</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/</link>
	<description>creating a new liberal-left force</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:17:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by HouseOfTwitsLib</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-54865</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by HouseOfTwitsLib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-54865</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by HouseOfTwitsLib [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by HouseOfTwitsLib [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kentron</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-54277</link>
		<dc:creator>Kentron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-54277</guid>
		<description>@46: &quot;Seconded, and I’ll add that closing libraries is just one well-heeled step awat from book-burning.&quot;

Err, what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@46: &#8220;Seconded, and I’ll add that closing libraries is just one well-heeled step awat from book-burning.&#8221;</p>
<p>Err, what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-54276</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-54276</guid>
		<description>&quot;Libraries are a mark of civilisation, their destruction is the mark of the barbarian.&quot;

Seconded, and I&#039;ll add that closing libraries is just one well-heeled step awat from book-burning.

Where were the other candidates during the libraries campaign? What do they have to say about it now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Libraries are a mark of civilisation, their destruction is the mark of the barbarian.&#8221;</p>
<p>Seconded, and I&#8217;ll add that closing libraries is just one well-heeled step awat from book-burning.</p>
<p>Where were the other candidates during the libraries campaign? What do they have to say about it now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britblog Roundup 229: The Bumper Office Moving Edition &#124; The Wardman Wire</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-54114</link>
		<dc:creator>Britblog Roundup 229: The Bumper Office Moving Edition &#124; The Wardman Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-54114</guid>
		<description>[...] Cath Elliott is trying being an ordinary voter in Norwich North. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cath Elliott is trying being an ordinary voter in Norwich North. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HouseofTwitsLib</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-81852</link>
		<dc:creator>HouseofTwitsLib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-81852</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @MarkReckons Liberal Conspiracy » Why I won’t vote Conservative in Norwich North - Cath Elliott http://bit.ly/4vFDzf
 [del.icio.us]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @MarkReckons Liberal Conspiracy » Why I won’t vote Conservative in Norwich North &#8211; Cath Elliott <a href="http://bit.ly/4vFDzf" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4vFDzf</a><br />
 [del.icio.us]</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Phillips-White</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-81851</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Phillips-White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-81851</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @MarkReckons: Liberal Conspiracy » Why I won’t vote Conservative in Norwich North - Cath Elliott http://bit.ly/4vFDzf&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @MarkReckons: Liberal Conspiracy » Why I won’t vote Conservative in Norwich North &#8211; Cath Elliott <a href="http://bit.ly/4vFDzf" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4vFDzf</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53922</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53922</guid>
		<description>The negative campaigning here seems to be done by the Lib Dems.  The BBC has picked up on how negative they have been about the Greens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The negative campaigning here seems to be done by the Lib Dems.  The BBC has picked up on how negative they have been about the Greens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim f</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53869</link>
		<dc:creator>tim f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53869</guid>
		<description>#42

I think it does say something if a candidate knocks on your door in a normal election, or if someone knocks on your door inbetween election periods. Definitely some candidates do it more than others (and some parties more than others), and in my experience the candidates who canvass the most tend to be the better-quality ones (regardless of left-right politics, although that distinction here is within the Labour Party rather than across parties, as I can only speak to what I know).

However, during a parliamentary by-election if all candidates from the major parties at least aren&#039;t full-time on the stump then they&#039;re not running a serious campaign. Whether you see someone or not is just dumb luck; whether you happen to be in when they knock your street. Certainly you can&#039;t go by anecdotal evidence on blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#42</p>
<p>I think it does say something if a candidate knocks on your door in a normal election, or if someone knocks on your door inbetween election periods. Definitely some candidates do it more than others (and some parties more than others), and in my experience the candidates who canvass the most tend to be the better-quality ones (regardless of left-right politics, although that distinction here is within the Labour Party rather than across parties, as I can only speak to what I know).</p>
<p>However, during a parliamentary by-election if all candidates from the major parties at least aren&#8217;t full-time on the stump then they&#8217;re not running a serious campaign. Whether you see someone or not is just dumb luck; whether you happen to be in when they knock your street. Certainly you can&#8217;t go by anecdotal evidence on blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noughtpointzero</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53866</link>
		<dc:creator>noughtpointzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53866</guid>
		<description>So what, if any party doesn&#039;t have the resources to come and knock on your door personally, you automatically hate them? Whatever happened to taking matters into your own hands and finding out about their policies yourself? It is not a PPC&#039;s responsibility to be at your constant beck and call. I really hate this &quot;a certain PCC didn&#039;t knock on my door therefore they must DIE&quot; attitude. It&#039;s just not possible to speak personally to 80,000 voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what, if any party doesn&#8217;t have the resources to come and knock on your door personally, you automatically hate them? Whatever happened to taking matters into your own hands and finding out about their policies yourself? It is not a PPC&#8217;s responsibility to be at your constant beck and call. I really hate this &#8220;a certain PCC didn&#8217;t knock on my door therefore they must DIE&#8221; attitude. It&#8217;s just not possible to speak personally to 80,000 voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen p</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53853</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53853</guid>
		<description>I think the Tories will get it. I can see their vote staying solid, Labour&#039;s poll rating nationally is up the swanny and there are bound to be pro-Ian Gibson voters who either stay at home or defect to protest at Labour HQ over how he&#039;s been dealt with.

Protest votes are what bielections are about, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Tories will get it. I can see their vote staying solid, Labour&#8217;s poll rating nationally is up the swanny and there are bound to be pro-Ian Gibson voters who either stay at home or defect to protest at Labour HQ over how he&#8217;s been dealt with.</p>
<p>Protest votes are what bielections are about, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denim Justice</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53851</link>
		<dc:creator>Denim Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53851</guid>
		<description>@35 Where is Murray polling higher than the Greens?

If you are referring to the bookmakers, which isn&#039;t the same thing as an opinion poll, the Greens are doing better than the Lib Dems and Murray.

Cath, look at the policies of each of the candidates.  Decide which is closest to your own political beliefs.  Then choose.  Voila!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@35 Where is Murray polling higher than the Greens?</p>
<p>If you are referring to the bookmakers, which isn&#8217;t the same thing as an opinion poll, the Greens are doing better than the Lib Dems and Murray.</p>
<p>Cath, look at the policies of each of the candidates.  Decide which is closest to your own political beliefs.  Then choose.  Voila!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53835</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53835</guid>
		<description>Rupert Read may have a bit of a persecution complex, and if I were running the Green campaign in Norwich North I&#039;d do things differently, but he&#039;s a hardworking guy with good policies, and I don&#039;t see anybody on that list better suited for high office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Read may have a bit of a persecution complex, and if I were running the Green campaign in Norwich North I&#8217;d do things differently, but he&#8217;s a hardworking guy with good policies, and I don&#8217;t see anybody on that list better suited for high office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Senior</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53829</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Senior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53829</guid>
		<description>Cath , I find it very strange that you have received no literatire at all from the LibDems . Nich Starling on his  Norfolkblogger blog is monitoring the leaflets put out and as at Saturday , the figures were Con and LibDem 8 each ( 1 of each not a constituency wide leaflet ) Labour and UKIP 3 each Nurray Holden and Greens 1 each . If you have received nothing at all from the LibDems there is clearly something going wrong .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cath , I find it very strange that you have received no literatire at all from the LibDems . Nich Starling on his  Norfolkblogger blog is monitoring the leaflets put out and as at Saturday , the figures were Con and LibDem 8 each ( 1 of each not a constituency wide leaflet ) Labour and UKIP 3 each Nurray Holden and Greens 1 each . If you have received nothing at all from the LibDems there is clearly something going wrong .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon Green</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-81853</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-81853</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Excellent piece by @CathElliott on the Norwich North by-election http://bit.ly/3jEZwW (via @AdamBienkov)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Excellent piece by @CathElliott on the Norwich North by-election <a href="http://bit.ly/3jEZwW" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3jEZwW</a> (via @AdamBienkov)</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53823</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53823</guid>
		<description>23.Cath Elliot .  Libraries are vital to encourage children to read.  We have massive problem with low levels of literacy amongst many parts of the population, especially the poor.  When a child becomes an enthusiastic reader , it is too expensive for parents to buy books.  Also it is too expensive for elderly people to buy books.   An elderly person walking to the library   encourages physical and mental activity and will help to stave off the decline in their faculties.   Libraries can also provide computer facilities for the elderly. Libraries act as a community centre. The elderly, infirm  and the young often meet at libraries which acts as a focus and point of dissemination of local information.

Libraries are a mark of civilisation, their destruction is the mark of the barbarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>23.Cath Elliot .  Libraries are vital to encourage children to read.  We have massive problem with low levels of literacy amongst many parts of the population, especially the poor.  When a child becomes an enthusiastic reader , it is too expensive for parents to buy books.  Also it is too expensive for elderly people to buy books.   An elderly person walking to the library   encourages physical and mental activity and will help to stave off the decline in their faculties.   Libraries can also provide computer facilities for the elderly. Libraries act as a community centre. The elderly, infirm  and the young often meet at libraries which acts as a focus and point of dissemination of local information.</p>
<p>Libraries are a mark of civilisation, their destruction is the mark of the barbarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Bienkov</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-81854</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bienkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-81854</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Excellent piece by @CathElliott on the Norwich North by-election http://bit.ly/3jEZwW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Excellent piece by @CathElliott on the Norwich North by-election <a href="http://bit.ly/3jEZwW" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3jEZwW</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen P</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53806</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53806</guid>
		<description>Yes. Well, of course, this bi-election is quite properly the business of the good people of Norfolk North.

Neverthless, I would like to ask, on behalf of the rest of us who live on this &#039;ere sceptered shpping hazard off the north-west coast of the Atlantic, whether, having determined who it is you wish to leave your local community most during the next 12 months from those on offer, what other benefits your country might provide you with?.

Suitable matters for consideration may include, for example, whether it would be necessary for the people to elect an MP at all, if sufficient space was available in prisons or psychiatric institutions?

Do you think a country  whose intellectuals take a huge pride in the fact that they came from two universities whose main claim to fame is that they&#039;ve managed to produce a couple of dozen students who don&#039;t actually sink often when trying to paddle a few yards down a river, to the intense relief of the rest of the planet,  would have cut it with your mums and dads, grandmas, grandads? Or do you think they were more interested in defeating Hitler and things?

Does there seem to be a lack of thrust, of idealism here?

S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Well, of course, this bi-election is quite properly the business of the good people of Norfolk North.</p>
<p>Neverthless, I would like to ask, on behalf of the rest of us who live on this &#8216;ere sceptered shpping hazard off the north-west coast of the Atlantic, whether, having determined who it is you wish to leave your local community most during the next 12 months from those on offer, what other benefits your country might provide you with?.</p>
<p>Suitable matters for consideration may include, for example, whether it would be necessary for the people to elect an MP at all, if sufficient space was available in prisons or psychiatric institutions?</p>
<p>Do you think a country  whose intellectuals take a huge pride in the fact that they came from two universities whose main claim to fame is that they&#8217;ve managed to produce a couple of dozen students who don&#8217;t actually sink often when trying to paddle a few yards down a river, to the intense relief of the rest of the planet,  would have cut it with your mums and dads, grandmas, grandads? Or do you think they were more interested in defeating Hitler and things?</p>
<p>Does there seem to be a lack of thrust, of idealism here?</p>
<p>S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisdair Cameron</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53801</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisdair Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53801</guid>
		<description>Vote Murray, Cath. End of story. He&#039;s polling higher than the Greens, so stands a better chance despite being impeded (dodgily), you&#039;ve shown why it won&#039;t be the Tories plus in the comments followed up why it ain&#039;t likely to be the libDems, Gibson isn&#039;t standing so can&#039;t get your personal vote, while a vote for Labour would be taken as support by both brown and his vile apparatchiks, who need to be binned for having buggered up the economy, civil rights &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; the cause of the centre/centre-left  (plus his words today for staying on in Afghanistan were noxious, alarmist and playing the illiberal catch-all domestic terror card)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote Murray, Cath. End of story. He&#8217;s polling higher than the Greens, so stands a better chance despite being impeded (dodgily), you&#8217;ve shown why it won&#8217;t be the Tories plus in the comments followed up why it ain&#8217;t likely to be the libDems, Gibson isn&#8217;t standing so can&#8217;t get your personal vote, while a vote for Labour would be taken as support by both brown and his vile apparatchiks, who need to be binned for having buggered up the economy, civil rights <i>and</i> the cause of the centre/centre-left  (plus his words today for staying on in Afghanistan were noxious, alarmist and playing the illiberal catch-all domestic terror card)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53798</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53798</guid>
		<description>The thing that angers me about the closure of libraries and similar local services is that is decided by how many people use that service and not who uses that service.  That slash and burn approach of political priorities, without a single care of the impact such desecration will have.  Local libraries are used by people who are socially isolated (not just in the geographical sense).  Vulnerable people who perhaps don’t have access to books at home for example.  Young people without a single book in the house or perhaps old people for whom books are their only outlet to any kind of pleasure.  Our communities are slowly dying and removing the infrastructure from those communities are hastening the day it all comes to an end.

Here is my small confession, I never use the library, I buy books (supporting my favourite, independent bookstore in the process), but the death of the library makes me shudder. 

What kind of society closes libraries?  A pretty short sighted one in my view.  Instead of sending copies of ‘Nineteen Eighty four’ to MPs, perhaps we should be handing out copies of ‘Fahrenheit 451’</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that angers me about the closure of libraries and similar local services is that is decided by how many people use that service and not who uses that service.  That slash and burn approach of political priorities, without a single care of the impact such desecration will have.  Local libraries are used by people who are socially isolated (not just in the geographical sense).  Vulnerable people who perhaps don’t have access to books at home for example.  Young people without a single book in the house or perhaps old people for whom books are their only outlet to any kind of pleasure.  Our communities are slowly dying and removing the infrastructure from those communities are hastening the day it all comes to an end.</p>
<p>Here is my small confession, I never use the library, I buy books (supporting my favourite, independent bookstore in the process), but the death of the library makes me shudder. </p>
<p>What kind of society closes libraries?  A pretty short sighted one in my view.  Instead of sending copies of ‘Nineteen Eighty four’ to MPs, perhaps we should be handing out copies of ‘Fahrenheit 451’</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asquith</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53796</link>
		<dc:creator>asquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53796</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to see how much support LURPAK get. We&#039;ll soon see how many bloggertarians there are in the real world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to see how much support LURPAK get. We&#8217;ll soon see how many bloggertarians there are in the real world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim f</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53794</link>
		<dc:creator>tim f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53794</guid>
		<description>&quot;I think what people don’t understand is that essentially branch libraries and city centre libraries serve entirely different functions. Branch libraries are to some extent more like community centres, and sometimes when you take them out of a community it can have a big impact.&quot;

This. Yes.

When I was growing up I had a library on my walk home from primary school and visited it two or three times a week. When I went to secondary school I outgrew the local library (I had read most things in it, anyway) and used the central library in town, but I still popped in from time to time, took my younger brother there, etc. You can&#039;t measure the value of these kinds of institutions by footfall alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think what people don’t understand is that essentially branch libraries and city centre libraries serve entirely different functions. Branch libraries are to some extent more like community centres, and sometimes when you take them out of a community it can have a big impact.&#8221;</p>
<p>This. Yes.</p>
<p>When I was growing up I had a library on my walk home from primary school and visited it two or three times a week. When I went to secondary school I outgrew the local library (I had read most things in it, anyway) and used the central library in town, but I still popped in from time to time, took my younger brother there, etc. You can&#8217;t measure the value of these kinds of institutions by footfall alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen P</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53793</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53793</guid>
		<description>Peter B: &quot;Now send me a picture of you so I can be sarcastic back please.&quot;

Sorry Peter, you&#039;re the candidate, not moi. You get to put up your pix, address etc, not moi. You get to take all the decisions...oh, sorry, of course, in your case you don&#039;t, do you? VOTE BAGGS AND DON&#039;T WORRY, I DON&#039;T STAND FOR ANYTHING!

Hmmm. Doesn&#039;t really roll off the tongue does it? Will have to work on it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter B: &#8220;Now send me a picture of you so I can be sarcastic back please.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry Peter, you&#8217;re the candidate, not moi. You get to put up your pix, address etc, not moi. You get to take all the decisions&#8230;oh, sorry, of course, in your case you don&#8217;t, do you? VOTE BAGGS AND DON&#8217;T WORRY, I DON&#8217;T STAND FOR ANYTHING!</p>
<p>Hmmm. Doesn&#8217;t really roll off the tongue does it? Will have to work on it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Baggs</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53792</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Baggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53792</guid>
		<description>Stephen P: Thanks for the sincerity vote, but I&#039;m just a bit fed up with our politicians ignoring their people in those things that we are all interested in. People would take a more lively view in politics if it wasn&#039;t so difficult to get through to them. I mean all the Labour party vote one way and all the Conservatives the other. That doesn&#039;t even give your average MP a say. So, yes I agree, that the two party system is bad for the country, but a few MPs following their constituents would help a lot. Now send me a picture of you so I can be sarcastic back please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen P: Thanks for the sincerity vote, but I&#8217;m just a bit fed up with our politicians ignoring their people in those things that we are all interested in. People would take a more lively view in politics if it wasn&#8217;t so difficult to get through to them. I mean all the Labour party vote one way and all the Conservatives the other. That doesn&#8217;t even give your average MP a say. So, yes I agree, that the two party system is bad for the country, but a few MPs following their constituents would help a lot. Now send me a picture of you so I can be sarcastic back please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen P</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53791</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53791</guid>
		<description>Peter Baggs: Nine out of ten for sincerity, Peter (as far as I can tell), but a whopping 273 out of ten for niavety, I&#039;m afraid. Politicians have to make decisions, it&#039;s what they&#039;re for. Even if it were practical, passing the buck to the electorate would solve nothing, merely abrogate responsibility.

For a start, there are very few issues that the electorate as a whole is remotely interested in. They would far rather get on with their work or businesses or raising their families or watching football or cricket or fishing or whatever. They expect their politicians to take decisions for them. Very many of them can&#039;t be raised from their slumber even once in four or five years to get to a polling booth.

That they can&#039;t could, in one sense, be due to the stultifying nature of two party politics. In another sense, it could be viewed as testement to the fact that, by and large, those involved in politics do a pretty good job, good enough at least to dissuade the population from preventing them from doing it when given the chance.

And apart from all that, it&#039;s clear from a moment&#039;s glance at your website that you&#039;re far too big to be a puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Baggs: Nine out of ten for sincerity, Peter (as far as I can tell), but a whopping 273 out of ten for niavety, I&#8217;m afraid. Politicians have to make decisions, it&#8217;s what they&#8217;re for. Even if it were practical, passing the buck to the electorate would solve nothing, merely abrogate responsibility.</p>
<p>For a start, there are very few issues that the electorate as a whole is remotely interested in. They would far rather get on with their work or businesses or raising their families or watching football or cricket or fishing or whatever. They expect their politicians to take decisions for them. Very many of them can&#8217;t be raised from their slumber even once in four or five years to get to a polling booth.</p>
<p>That they can&#8217;t could, in one sense, be due to the stultifying nature of two party politics. In another sense, it could be viewed as testement to the fact that, by and large, those involved in politics do a pretty good job, good enough at least to dissuade the population from preventing them from doing it when given the chance.</p>
<p>And apart from all that, it&#8217;s clear from a moment&#8217;s glance at your website that you&#8217;re far too big to be a puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cath Elliott</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/07/12/why-i-wont-vote-conservative-in-norwich-north/#comment-53790</link>
		<dc:creator>Cath Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=6239#comment-53790</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Peter&lt;/b&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;You mean you’ve heard nothing from the All New Libertarian and Fluffy Puppy Party of the United Kingdom? Shame …&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know, and nothing from the BNP, which as I&#039;ve got the booby traps all set at my front door I&#039;m actually really disappointed about :)

&lt;b&gt;Kentron&lt;/b&gt; As Norfolk is a big rural county we&#039;ve probably got one of the biggest mobile library services going. But they&#039;re used as you&#039;ve said for villages and such, not in the city. We used to have what they called Special Services mobiles, that delivered to old folks&#039; homes in the city, but my understanding is even these are now being replaced by the housebound service, and again, that&#039;s about bringing books to people rather than encouraging/helping people to get out and about themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Peter</b><br />
<blockquote>You mean you’ve heard nothing from the All New Libertarian and Fluffy Puppy Party of the United Kingdom? Shame …</p></blockquote>
<p>I know, and nothing from the BNP, which as I&#8217;ve got the booby traps all set at my front door I&#8217;m actually really disappointed about <img src='http://liberalconspiracy.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><b>Kentron</b> As Norfolk is a big rural county we&#8217;ve probably got one of the biggest mobile library services going. But they&#8217;re used as you&#8217;ve said for villages and such, not in the city. We used to have what they called Special Services mobiles, that delivered to old folks&#8217; homes in the city, but my understanding is even these are now being replaced by the housebound service, and again, that&#8217;s about bringing books to people rather than encouraging/helping people to get out and about themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
