I suppose in the brevity of comments it had come across to me, falsely from your explantion, that you were one of the “blame it on America brigade”.

But I do think that far too many in the generic term of Left, are bearing down with eager glee on an administration which is doing many, many things right. As if the 8 horrible years of Bush made the Left incapable of not behaving like attack dogs, which in turn draws us ever nearer to the attitudes and behaviour of the (other generic meaningless term) Right.

But quite what all this has to do with MJ and Iran I’ve no idea but it is certainly an epic drift of topic.

Yeah, it is! I wouldn’t want to be in the “blame it on America” brigade, because frankly they are idiots. However, I do tend to fall into the “look at the regional hegemon and think ‘hmmmm’” bracket.

I’m not trying to be wearisome but the Foreign Policy of the White house isn’t really about Conservative vs Liberal. If you look at the history of it, its been very consistent despite who has been in the White House (up until Bush, who was a bit of an aberation).

All manner of presidents and parties in America’s history have meddelled in other countries affairs. The US has been involved in inumerable coups and dirty wars in Latin America through the last 200 years (including military deployment in Columbia, bombing Farc, accusing Chavez of helping Farc, assisting a coup in Venezuala etc.), it would be bizarre not to ask questions when US involvement is the rule and not exception.

As things stand, at a very early stage, in a conflict getting very little media attention, it looks like the US is not involved and has actively condemned the coup. Which is fantastic, and is definitely allaying some of the fears I originally had when I saw “slightly left wing candidate ousted in coup in Central American state.”

I will remain cynical but I look forward to being proved wrong.

Anyway, the point I was trying to make was that it does seem odd that this has got so little attention everywhere. Even with MJ and Iran this is fairly big. Big enough to deserve some higher profile coverage.

Some cynicism is healthy, but just doubting everything is wearisome.

Yeah, but a lot of stuff is. Given that Obama isn’t revolutionising US foreign policy I think it’s sensible to ask the question.

“Nope – he denounced the coup as illegal yesterday”

He has, which is good. But having recently read Open Veins of Latin America I am a little weary of the US in Latin America.

Some in America do support it. But hopefully Obama will back up his rhetoric and support the people of Honduras.

I’m keeping an open mind. Cynicism is healthy.

Nope – he denounced the coup as illegal yesterday

Liek you say, anyone can find anything in any tune, Lady in Red makes my blood boil and but my friend who works in hospital radio tells me it is a highly requested track for husbands to their wives in terrible death bed situtations. Each to their own but I think the music, YouTUbe video format leaves me cold.

However, I do think you’re onto something with the Blur mash-up.

I do think there are some worthwhile things you can get from there. I am not saying for one second you couldn’t get these from other songs or art. But I think there are things in there to be found.

I used to think Heal The World was just one big paedophilic battle-cry, but having listened to it a few months ago I think it is a very simple message of wanting to save the entire world all at once. Not many other songs even bother to promise you anything more than sympathy with how you are feeling, or to paint a picture of the world as it is rather than how it could be.

I just really connect with the bit in Man In The Mirror where he sings ‘Who am I to be blind, pretending I don’t see their need?” I feel that way whenever I walk past a beggar or Big Issue seller, particularly those Romanian women. Indeed, who am I to pretend whatever left-wing activism absolves me of the need to just help support people who rely on my generosity?

I’m not convinced by the format I think.

Denim Justice: I’m still not convinced about the lyrical merits of MJ’s tunes.

I’m not sure I would use the phrase “now that he’s dead” in such an cynical manner. Its not as if we’ve been sitting around saying “if only Michael Jackson were to die…” More that there’s a zeitgeist here, a confluence of events that impose a new interpretation onto old songs.

@Daniel H-G (4):

As for taking images of Iranians dying and being beaten-up and putting them with terrible music, instead of MJ can we not use Coldplay instead, or Red Hot Chilli Peppers?

First, I was suggesting soundtracks for the more positive aspects of the protests – and there have been uplifiting moments – rather than the violence. Second, I’m saying that the music might be chosen for reasons associated with the aforementioned zeitgeist, than a person’s individual taste. Until Coldplay or the RHCP release a new album or rock a summer festival, its not them.

@ Left Outside: A very good point indeed.

We should heed the words of Michael: if you want to make the world a better place, take a look at yourself and make a change.

Is Obama involved, after all the US has a huge track record in fucking up those in the region?

How violent will it get?

Will Chavez really invade?

What will happen to its antediluvian constitution?

This is entirely true, and I for one am deeply saddened by their callous and childish response to Jackson’s death. Let us remember that, while he may have been on a major celebrity, he was also a human being.

Mind you, it’s probably a good thing he kicked the bucket rather than his sister. After all, Jacko was obviously a washed up mentalist, but there’s always a possibility that Janet might get her diddies out again.

The Iran story can also be ‘tiring’ upon those people that find such stuff wearisome and the death of MJ is great ‘feel good’ cover for all of that.

As for taking images of Iranians dying and being beaten-up and putting them with terrible music, instead of MJ can we not use Coldplay instead, or Red Hot Chilli Peppers?

I could not have expressed my own view more eloquently.

Or perhaps you compassionate liberals are slowly realising that Michael Jackson was also a compassionate person and when the predictable, cheap and judgemental jokes have done the rounds, maybe people will stop and listen – via the songs, the lyrics, the videos,the personal giving, the Heal the World Foundations etc. – that Michael Jackson was a humanitarian. Not Gandhi by far but still, a generous, caring humanitarian. It’s sad that he had to die before people acknowledged that but hey ho, the world is full of shallow people.