<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Finally Ratifies CRPD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/06/13/uk-finally-ratifies-crpd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/06/13/uk-finally-ratifies-crpd/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Duff</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/06/13/uk-finally-ratifies-crpd/#comment-50181</link>
		<dc:creator>David Duff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=5678#comment-50181</guid>
		<description>Both, I would have thought, and certainly a menace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both, I would have thought, and certainly a menace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Ismail</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/06/13/uk-finally-ratifies-crpd/#comment-50167</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Ismail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=5678#comment-50167</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think so. I think the police cn force them into treatment under the Mental Health Act... unless the Convention changes that. But do those count as disabilities, or are they considered illnesses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so. I think the police cn force them into treatment under the Mental Health Act&#8230; unless the Convention changes that. But do those count as disabilities, or are they considered illnesses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Duff</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/06/13/uk-finally-ratifies-crpd/#comment-50166</link>
		<dc:creator>David Duff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=5678#comment-50166</guid>
		<description>&quot;saying no to being placed in an institution; saying no to medical or psychological treatment;&quot;

Would that include those suffering with schitzophrenia and other pathological psychoses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;saying no to being placed in an institution; saying no to medical or psychological treatment;&#8221;</p>
<p>Would that include those suffering with schitzophrenia and other pathological psychoses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/06/13/uk-finally-ratifies-crpd/#comment-50146</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=5678#comment-50146</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Sarah, thanks.  This process of standard-setting at the international level and then getting governments to ratify treaties and take on the obligations that they entail has been shown to be an extremely effective way of campaigning (I was involved in similar campaigns over torture and the death penalty when I worked at Amnesty).  It does not get attention from the mainstream media because it seems too technical, but it really does help to achieve lasting change.

You might also be interested in this - which I wrote many, many years ago:

http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/BCODP/human%20rights%20conv.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Sarah, thanks.  This process of standard-setting at the international level and then getting governments to ratify treaties and take on the obligations that they entail has been shown to be an extremely effective way of campaigning (I was involved in similar campaigns over torture and the death penalty when I worked at Amnesty).  It does not get attention from the mainstream media because it seems too technical, but it really does help to achieve lasting change.</p>
<p>You might also be interested in this &#8211; which I wrote many, many years ago:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/BCODP/human%20rights%20conv.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/BCODP/human%20rights%20conv.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/06/13/uk-finally-ratifies-crpd/#comment-74929</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=5678#comment-74929</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;New post: UK Finally Ratifies CRPD http://bit.ly/MqTHC&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;topsy_trackback_links&quot;&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/libcon/status/2153341872&quot;&gt;Original tweet&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">New post: UK Finally Ratifies CRPD <a href="http://bit.ly/MqTHC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/MqTHC</a></span></p>
<div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/libcon/status/2153341872">Original tweet</a>]</div>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

