The atmosphere in Westminster is oppressive. Hop up the steps from the tube and the cries from the Tamils on Parliament Square bite your ears. I’ve seen plenty of protests on that piece of green over the past few years, but this one crackles like a storm-cloud ready to discharge a bolt of lightning.
The wind seems angry too, sweeping through Victoria Tower Gardens, pulling the hats off tourists and messing up their grey comb-overs. The pigtails on school children billow in syncronicity with the union flag above the tower.
Meanwhile, the press and the suits hurry in and out of the building. They ignore the angry mob and the red flags across the street, and yet they are under attack. They shrug off the violent wind, yet there is a storm brewing inside.
A man of about thirty moves slowly through the crowd. He has a grubby brown jacket and a bad back, both of which accounts for the angry expression on his face. He is hungry and slightly dazed from some painkillers, which accounts for the punch-drunk gait. The protesters, the tourists, the wind, don’t help his mood. Seeds, pollen from the trees, waft down and interfere with his eyes.
And as he approaches Millbank, a tall man in a light grey suit emerges from one of the offices, and turns back towards the Palace. Around his neck hangs a security pass, one with the green and white stripes, the most sought-after there is. He walks with his head bowed, looking at his feet, and doesn’t see the man in the brown jacket lumbering towards him. And the man in the brown jacket has no inclination to move. Only when they are in each other’s personal space, does the man with the green striped security pass feel the presence of the other. He twitches only slightly but is visibly startled. It is as if he is expects to be mugged on the street.
He, the politician, regains his stride and heads towards The Commons. I, the man in the brown jacket, haul myself into the coffee shop on the corner, the better to take refuge from the storm.
| Post to del.icio.us |
New post: Storm Brewing http://bit.ly/b4KWq
This is a rather fabulous little post; a lovely piece of writing. Cheers.
I am amazed this series of protests has not been given more thought and analysis by the left or anyone else in Britain. Whilst the protests have been so long and sustained that they have generated coverage, commentators haven’t weighed in on it to the extent that the conflict is more widely understood among the public. As I understand it there were two protests today: one outside the High Commission where 1,000 non-Tamil Sinhalese protested against alleged collusion between the UK government and the LTTE (which doesn’t quite sound plausible); and the other, in Parliament Square, where 2,000 Tamils protested against the government’s silence over the Sri Lankan government’s killing of Tamil civilians.
All in all, pretty explosive stuff that is almost sailing under the radar of the commentariat. I am not saying it is because the latter do not care, but it certainly hasn’t been a big issue on the agenda, expenses or otherwise. Why is that?
2. Because the issue is complicated and it is difficult for th left wing middle class to portray the LTTE as blameless.
I’m not sure it’s even a case of portraying it as black and white, good-vs-bad a la Israel/Palestine. The LTTE are violent terrorists who have probably killed more of their own people than the Sri Lankan government. But what I, and I wager I’m not the only one, do not yet know is whether or not those people demonstrating in Westminster were doing it explicitly for the LTTE or for the Tamil people more generally. I had assumed it was the latter, but it appears also to have contained an element of the former. Sunny has just written on Pickled Politics about not supporting or sympathising with the LTTE, which is of course correct: but at the same time, I do wonder if those Tamils in Westminster were justified in protesting the level of violence the Sri Lankan government has inflicted upon the Tamil civilian population in an attempt to destroy the LTTE. I do not think it is as cut-and-dry as “they’ve killed the terrorists and ended the war so let’s not highlight the violence they committed in order to do it”. Something similar happens over Israel/Palestine discussions.
Anyway, I am glad the fighting is over. What it means for regional stability is unknown at this point, but assuming the insurgency has finally been crushed one only hopes that things can only get better from here.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
| 7 Comments 22 Comments 35 Comments 65 Comments 2 Comments 47 Comments 8 Comments 8 Comments 8 Comments 22 Comments | LATEST COMMENTS » Tom Freeman posted on What brain scans can't teach us » John77 posted on Tory MP attacks Unite after receiving thousands from British Airways » Barry Allen posted on Want to be a community organiser? » pagar posted on Against multiculturalism » Just Visiting posted on Against multiculturalism » 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism » 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism » Just Visiting posted on Against multiculturalism » John77 posted on Tory MP attacks Unite after receiving thousands from British Airways » Just Visiting posted on Against multiculturalism » sally posted on Tory MP attacks Unite after receiving thousands from British Airways » Lee Griffin posted on Digital Economy Bill: Why Amendment 120a isn't our enemy » Charlieman posted on DNA Sampling: Wrong in principle, wrong in practice » uberVU - social comments posted on DNA Sampling: Wrong in principle, wrong in practice » Thebee posted on Tories offer state funding to schools linked to 'occult society' Last 50 // Comments feed |