Naltrexone Get High Raquel Allegra Buy Buy Xenical Diet Pills Cialis Dose For Pulmonary Hypertension Mail Order Zyrtec D

The Met must stop spinning its actions

7:07 pm - May 1st 2009

by Guest    

      Share on Tumblr

by Guy Aitchison and Andy May
The Metropolitan Police Authority met yesterday for the first time since the policing of the G20 protests. Defend Peaceful Protest put its questions directly to Boris Johnson. The Met were represented by acting deputy commissioner Tim Godwin (standing in for Sir Paul Stephenson) and temporary assistant commissioner Chris Allison.

The good news is that the MPA, which is made up of 11 independent members and 12 London Assembly members, were largely supportive of the protestors’ rights and had critical things to say about the G20 policing – see Anna Bragga on OK for a full report. The bad news is that we were not satisfied with the Met’s response which, when not actively misleading, amounted to “we’re conducting an enquiry, so we’re not going to answer any of your questions yet.”

Probably the most disturbing thing is that the senior police officers are still attempting to spin their way out of trouble. Chris Allison defended the tactics of “containment and controlled dispersal” (the police’s preferred term for “kettling”) which he said was the least violent option.

We believe there were at least 3 police defences for the containment tactics used which are extremely misleading if not totally untrue.

No 1: The police claim flares were thrown and they were “pelted with bottles” at the bank of England BEFORE introducing the cordons. We have seen no video or witness statements to corroborate this. The violence, including the smashing of RBS, came AFTER the police cordon was imposed around 12.20.

No.2: The police claim they clearly told Climate Camp protestors with a loudhailer that they would clear the camp. We were there at 7.10pm when this began and heard no warning from police. Nor did many other protestors who have submitted witness statements. Either there was no warning or the warning wasn’t communicated to the whole camp.

No.3: The police claim a semi-permeable cordon was in operation around the Bank of England and Climate Camp, allowing people to leave wherever possible. All the evidence, and our own experience, suggests this was not the case and that protesters and passers-by were indiscriminately detained with only a lucky few (mainly press) allowed to leave.

Other misleading statements by the police include the claim that Climate Camp blocked a “four lane highway” at Bishopsgate (it was two lane) and that camp representatives “refused to divulge their plans” at a meeting with senior officers (outside observeres say they were extremely co-operative).

This is in addition to their spinning of Ian Tomlinson’s death in their initial press releases and their repeated claim that there were “violent” elements at climate camp when many observers have clearly stated that there were none and not one camper was arrested for violence.

This blatant spinning must stop, the police must admit they got the tactics wrong or they’ll further damage their reputation amongst protestors and the general public alike.

The MPA unanimously agreed to examine kettling and other public-order police tactics in its civil liberties panel. We will keep on lobbying the MPA and work with them to ensure that the HMIC review into public order policing includes the concerns of protesters, protest groups and the general public, without which it can hardly be expected to restore public trust in protest policing.

Join our campaign at: Defend Peaceful Protest, and / or join the Facebook group for regular updates.

    Share on Tumblr   submit to reddit  

About the author
This is a guest post.
· Other posts by

Story Filed Under: Blog ,Civil liberties ,Crime

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Reader comments

Guy and Andy:

Great post, fantastic campaign.

I’ve been meaning to write an article myself but I’m going to start the process here, because I think that your project and these guys could be no end of use to each other.

It is fairly clear that the UK is not a police state. The question PSUK are interested in asking, and keeping an active watch on, is how far from it we are and whether we’re getting worse or better. The more eyes and contributors it has, the more effective a monitoring community we’ll make. I’m a contributor but not an editor there.

Thanks John, I’ve found your commentary on this topic very interesting as well.

Can you please re-post the PSUK link? It didn’t work in that comment. The question of when will we know whether were in a police state was asked by David Davis MP in his speech at the Convention on Modern Liberty:

I’m sure there’s ways the two groups can work together. The more people campaigning in this area the better, as you say.

3. Chris Baldwin

But what should West Yorkshire Police do?

Oops: wonder what happened there.

Thanks 🙂

It is a fantastically important issue.

It’s easy to get sidetracked by the financial collapse and dirtyness of our domestic politics – which, important though they are, can suck up attention from other things. Policing the police is the sort of nuts and bolts politics, activism citizenship that is essential to the basic functioning of a society.

Keep up the good work.

Yes it is a fantastically important issue. I’d quarrel with one aspect of this article. Please don’t use the euphemistic word spinning, or “misleading statements”. They’ve got to stop telling lies. The fact is that our police force is run by liars. And every time they tell lies, it sticks. There are still people going round telling the story of Jean Charles de Menezes’s bulky coat.

These people can’t change. We need to get honest people in charge of policing. Meanwhile, knowing how our police officers are in the habit of lying, how can we believe in any conviction by a British court made on the evidence of police officers?

Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    New post: The Met must stop spinning its actions

  2. Liberal Conspiracy

    New post: The Met must stop spinning its actions

  3. S Smith

    The Met must stop spinning its actions

  4. » Second meeting: police still not listeningLiberal Conspiracy

    […] the first meeting the Met showed no signs of having taken on board the serious and widespread criticism of their […]

  5. G20 Policing: Still No Answers « Global Justice: Tipping the Scales

    […] met for the second time since the operation to question Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson. At the first meeting the Met showed no signs of having taken on board the serious and widespread criticism of their […]

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.