The grisly aspect of this is that none of these twats have any interest in the game they are patronising. Get a grip, for gawd’s sake, there is a limit to the amount of pity even someone as generously disposed as myself can conjure up. Or at least offer some reasons or evidence for your chants of how wonderful they are. The Hitler masses chanted Seig Heil and your chants of God Save the Queen have an unfortuneate similarity.

Can I recommend that you read a recent book “High Society in the Third Reich by Fabrice d’Almeida” which demonstrates, inter alia, that “if princes had constituted a profession, ‘they would have rivalled physicians as the most Nazified in the Third Reich (doctors’ membership peaked in 1937 at 43 per cent)’ ” and that by 1938, 20% of senior SS Officers were members of noble families.

Charles indeed does turn away at any suggestion that there could possible be any contradiction of his many off the wall ideas. The fact that the man or woman putting them may be a Nobel Prize winner, someone who has broken new ground in medical reserach has no effect on this royal clown.

Wouldn’t you think that even someone surrounded by flatterers and sycophants might think that he is just overdoing it a little. His ass licking servants admit that he musn’t be contradicted as a distinguished medical researcher discovered when he dared to raise the issue of homeopathy.

Charles response to those with whom disagrees is to turn his back on them.

And according to their website at http://www.royal.gov.uk, his surname when he needs one is Mountbatten-Windsor.

It’s a useful site – teaches us how to bow and curtsy when meeting one of the Royle Family, and instructs us to end a letter to Elizabeth Mountbatten-Windsor, “I have the honour to be, Madam, Your Majesty’s humble and obedient servant”. Now that’s clever. As an honest republican celt, I could never end a letter like that, so I can’t write to her!

As for Phil he was on the make from the start. Advised by Mountbatten. They are sanctimonious, creepy hypocrites: preaching family values and behavious like lecherous rabbits.

What is the matter with you, Chav? You can do better than this?

God save the Queen.

And please don’t mention fatty Andrew Windsor and his Falklands “adventure”. He was never in any danger.

As for William Windsor? He managed to fly a helicopter in an amazingly short time – they are actually extremely difficult to fly as another of my helicopter flying friends tells me – and all Willie Windsor was pick up some kudus, play about and land the thing at great public expense to impress one of his girl friends.

They, the Royals, are on the way out. And they are being torpedoed by the Internet and freedom of speech. The Brits were the only people in Europe not allowed to read about Nazi Eddie and his Mistress before WW11. And the Royals managed with some success to block Kitty Kelley’s expose of their antics. I think it was Kitty Kelley who described The Queen Mum falling face forward into a bowl of trifle blind drunk. Di, married to Charles Windsor as a human brood mare, hated Queen Mum and her basilisk stare.

You are contradicting yourself, dear boy. Its exactly the major issues, some of which you mention, that need solutions or at least action, and not timewasting on the monarchy. There is no popular support for amending the monarchy.

As for an increasing rage from the peasantry. I’m afraid, protesting middle-class students are not peasants. The rage from us peasants will be directed at Labour next year, when they face wipe-out.

Oh yes there are people who claim this. Maybe not on here ,but I have heard them, the usual Royal brown noses.

What I don’t understand is why, if we are going to have non political head of state, why do people always assume that the person has to be a politician or former politician? They always trot out this crap about President Thatcher or President Blair.

But the Royal Family is supposed to be non political (of course that is rubbish) but if they are going to be non political, you can anyone you like. At least we could choose.

Meanwhile, her weak and Nazi sympathasising brother-in-law had to be pushed into a non job in the Bahamas (as governor, I think) and to get him out of they way. I think Churchill put most of the pressure on that one. But why should a hopeless misfit like that be given a job as Governor. He should probably have stood trial for treason.

I felt some sympathy for Mrs Simpson in the end. She stuck by her weak and traitorous husband and for some reason remained unforgiven by the Queen Mum who had such elevated ideas – utter fantasy of course – about her royal status. Princess Margaret was regarded as “The Guest from Hell” when she visited her “friends.” What example do these promiscuous, ill educated, promise breaking, wasters set? How dare they set themselves up as exemplars to the rest of us; superior in what sense?

With a global economy in meltdown; the planet being wrecked environmentally; and an increasing rage from the peasantry, I think Gordon Brown needs to wake up. We do not want them; they do know good; their fancy sress are titles are an affront. How much more clear has this to be made. Tinkering won’t help. The geological analogy fits the bill – dispose of the rock that blocks the stream. Give them a pension, a council house each and boot them out. It can’t be all that difficult.

In fact, there is good reason to believe that when Hess came to the UK in 1940 to meet senior landed gentry in the Tory party, a deal was being thrashed out for a peace settlement in which Britain would have peace with Germany, and in exchange Churchill would be removed from office and replaced by a good old Tory aristocrat, and the Queen mother would have stayed on willingly with her husband as a sort of Vichy Royal family.

We will never know for sure because when they opened the cabinet papers a few years ago, much of it had mysteriously vanished, and had been removed to the Royal archives at Windsor where they will never see the light of day. Thankfully Churchill put a stop to what ever dodgy deal was being constructed.

“Britain is n ow unmistakebly a multi-cultural, multi-racial, multi-religion society”

Its typical, dare I say it, racist nonsense from the Left to think that immigrants to the UK don’t want to continue our cultural and political traditions or even to use them as a tool to destroy our identity and culture

With regard to the many cultures and faiths in this country , Britain is a predominantly ( 90%)Celtic/Viking/Anglo-Saxon / Norman nation with a Christian background which is tolerant of other faiths and cultures. A jewish person once said ” Britain is the only country in which I can vote Conservative without worrying about the sound of jackboots”. A very successful Hindu businessman praised the tolerance of this country as has such Mulsim business men as Sir Gulam Noon. Sir Andrew Sacks, Chief Rabbi and Archbishop Sentenu are good examples of the tolerance of this country and both have said we ought to be more proud of our traditions. Therefore, Charles taking about being “Defender of Faith” is an idea which should be discussed.

In France, in the election before last the presidential race was between Chiraq and fascist , Le Pen. The left of centre parties were utterly useless.

A constitutional monarchy can act as a bulwark against extremism, particularly where the threat is from the right.

Sorry to keep going on, Charlie, but just a minute!

The ex-Kaiser Wilhelm was an admirer of Hitler, grateful to have a Nazi Guard of Honour at his exiled home in Holland for the last year of his life after the Occupation and was accorded a State Funeral by Hitler in 1941.
Crown Prince Wilhelm deferred to Hitler as extreme Right Wing candidate for President against Hindenburg in 1932, joined the Nazi Party and for two crucial years gave Hitler and other leading Nazis photo-opportunities with him to attract Royalist support to their cause.
He only retreated from such when his closest political advisor was nevertheless murdered by the Nazis in June 1934.
He never spoke against the Nazis, however -not even after the WW2- but just fell silent.
But his eldest son volunteered for Military Service in 1939 and was killed fighting for Hitler in France in 1940.

So much for the German Hohenzollern Imperial family.

It is true that the Austrian hapsburgs were anti-Nazi but as Auistria was absorbed by Germany and not the other way round, I don’t really see what point you are trying to make about that.