Newspapers: thinking the unthinkable
Back in 1993, the Knight-Ridder newspaper chain began investigating piracy of Dave Barry’s popular column, which was published by the Miami Herald and syndicated widely. In the course of tracking down the sources of unlicensed distribution, they found many things, including the copying of his column to alt.fan.dave_barry on usenet; a 2000-person strong mailing list also reading pirated versions; and a teenager in the Midwest who was doing some of the copying himself, because he loved Barry’s work so much he wanted everybody to be able to read it.
One of the people I was hanging around with online back then was Gordy Thompson, who managed internet services at the New York Times. I remember Thompson saying something to the effect of “When a 14 year old kid can blow up your business in his spare time, not because he hates you but because he loves you, then you got a problem.” I think about that conversation a lot these days.
The problem newspapers face isn’t that they didn’t see the internet coming. They not only saw it miles off, they figured out early on that they needed a plan to deal with it, and during the early 90s they came up with not just one plan but several. One was to partner with companies like America Online, a fast-growing subscription service that was less chaotic than the open internet. Another plan was to educate the public about the behaviors required of them by copyright law. New payment models such as micropayments were proposed. Alternatively, they could pursue the profit margins enjoyed by radio and TV, if they became purely ad-supported. Still another plan was to convince tech firms to make their hardware and software less capable of sharing, or to partner with the businesses running data networks to achieve the same goal. Then there was the nuclear option: sue copyright infringers directly, making an example of them.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Clay _Shirky_. His name is right there in the URL…
Let’s not overstate this — the dead tree edition of newspapers has certain virtually unassailable advantages. For instance, I don’t see electronic editions being of much use for doing the crossword on the train.
James: What about when the Kindle becomes a mass-market product?
Thanks Andrew, corrected.
Why not have touch-screen newspaper editions, so you can not only do the crossword with a stylus (like Dr Kawashima’s Brain Training) but also zoom in to particular columns etc. I reckon people will be stubborn enough to continue buying paper newspapers, which has always seemed odd when you can get all newspaper content for free online – I guess they “like the feel” of the paper in their hands – so publishers will continue to make paper versions.
And then there is the issue of the low-quality freesheets in London – the sooner they go, the better, but I reckon many commuters find them a convenient distraction.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
New post: Newspaper: the unthinkable http://tinyurl.com/c5oaup
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
» Laziness levels in Britain getting lazier, wails government
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 8 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 16 Comments 83 Comments 203 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » rentergirl posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » sunny hundal posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Tyler posted on When disabled people want to work - employers can hold the back » pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Jared Earle posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Craig Grannell posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Martin McIvor posted on Labour: public pay won't be frozen entirely » Martin McIvor posted on Labour: public pay won't be frozen entirely » JIm posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » K Carington Smith posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Martin McIvor posted on Labour: public pay won't be frozen entirely » pagar posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » leftlinks posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? |









