<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberal Conspiracy briefing: Exposing the DWP&#8217;s lie detector testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:20:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Watch</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-345544</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-345544</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@cathynewman  Could I humbly suggest a bit of research on the previous polygraph pushers, Cathy? http://t.co/JFH7JRsx #dwp #spiv&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@cathynewman  Could I humbly suggest a bit of research on the previous polygraph pushers, Cathy? <a href="http://t.co/JFH7JRsx" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/JFH7JRsx</a> #dwp #spiv</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Bryant</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-174259</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-174259</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @tonybovaird Lie detector test 4 benefits claimants generated ‘false positive’ rate of almost 64% in pilot council - http://bit.ly/9LoCkU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @tonybovaird Lie detector test 4 benefits claimants generated ‘false positive’ rate of almost 64% in pilot council &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/9LoCkU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9LoCkU</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shed Dweller</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-175050</link>
		<dc:creator>Shed Dweller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-175050</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @tonybovaird: Lie detector test for benefits claimants generated a ‘false positive’ rate of almost 64% in pilot council - http://bit.ly/9LoCkU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @tonybovaird: Lie detector test for benefits claimants generated a ‘false positive’ rate of almost 64% in pilot council &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/9LoCkU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9LoCkU</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs Blogs</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-174257</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-174257</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @sunny_hundal: Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits http://bit.ly/9LoCkU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @sunny_hundal: Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits <a href="http://bit.ly/9LoCkU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9LoCkU</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Bovaird</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-174246</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bovaird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-174246</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Lie detector test for benefits claimants generated a ‘false positive’ rate of almost 64% in pilot council - http://bit.ly/9LoCkU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Lie detector test for benefits claimants generated a ‘false positive’ rate of almost 64% in pilot council &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/9LoCkU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9LoCkU</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennifer roberts</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-174247</link>
		<dc:creator>jennifer roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-174247</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @sunny_hundal: Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits http://bit.ly/9LoCkU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @sunny_hundal: Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits <a href="http://bit.ly/9LoCkU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9LoCkU</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sandars</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-174248</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sandars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-174248</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @markwrightuk88: a worrying sign that the DWP will be using lie detectors on claiments http://is.gd/f8coM&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @markwrightuk88: a worrying sign that the DWP will be using lie detectors on claiments <a href="http://is.gd/f8coM" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/f8coM</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark wright</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-174249</link>
		<dc:creator>mark wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-174249</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;a worrying sign that the DWP will be using lie detectors on claiments http://is.gd/f8coM&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">a worrying sign that the DWP will be using lie detectors on claiments <a href="http://is.gd/f8coM" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/f8coM</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-174250</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-174250</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Liberal conspiracy report DWP attempt to force benefit claimants into unreliable &amp; stigmatising lie detector tests http://bit.ly/9LoCkU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Liberal conspiracy report DWP attempt to force benefit claimants into unreliable &amp; stigmatising lie detector tests <a href="http://bit.ly/9LoCkU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9LoCkU</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Kay</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-174243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-174243</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @sunny_hundal: Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits http://bit.ly/9LoCkU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @sunny_hundal: Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits <a href="http://bit.ly/9LoCkU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9LoCkU</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yorkierosie</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-174244</link>
		<dc:creator>yorkierosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-174244</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @sunny_hundal: Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits http://bit.ly/9LoCkU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @sunny_hundal: Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits <a href="http://bit.ly/9LoCkU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9LoCkU</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Jones</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-174238</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-174238</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @sunny_hundal: Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits http://bit.ly/9LoCkU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @sunny_hundal: Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits <a href="http://bit.ly/9LoCkU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9LoCkU</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunny hundal</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-174239</link>
		<dc:creator>sunny hundal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-174239</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits http://bit.ly/9LoCkU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Bizarre Margaret Hodge is criticising govt for using private contractors to get ppl off benefits <a href="http://bit.ly/9LoCkU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9LoCkU</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purnell&#8217;s plans for alcoholics &#171; The Bleeding Heart Show</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-41755</link>
		<dc:creator>Purnell&#8217;s plans for alcoholics &#171; The Bleeding Heart Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-41755</guid>
		<description>[...] I suppose you could ask them whether they&#8217;re alcoholics, but how many people who are ever answer affirmitively? If you deny your addiction to your friends, your family and even yourself, you&#8217;re hardly going to open up to someone you only see once a fortnight and who only knows you as a name on a computer. And before we start going down the lie detector test route, we should note that this has already been torn to shreds. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I suppose you could ask them whether they&#8217;re alcoholics, but how many people who are ever answer affirmitively? If you deny your addiction to your friends, your family and even yourself, you&#8217;re hardly going to open up to someone you only see once a fortnight and who only knows you as a name on a computer. And before we start going down the lie detector test route, we should note that this has already been torn to shreds. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purnell&#8217;s Lie Detector - The Scientific Evidence &#124; Ministry of Truth</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-37886</link>
		<dc:creator>Purnell&#8217;s Lie Detector - The Scientific Evidence &#124; Ministry of Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-37886</guid>
		<description>[...] Liberal Conspiracy briefing: Exposing the DWP’s lie detector testing, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liberal Conspiracy briefing: Exposing the DWP’s lie detector testing, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanbikinoraion</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-37786</link>
		<dc:creator>sanbikinoraion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-37786</guid>
		<description>Bravo to #31!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo to #31!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayyan</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-37783</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-37783</guid>
		<description>Does anyone remember that daytime TV show &quot;Lie Detector&quot; from quite a few years back?  Maybe we should make politicians go on it!  

&quot;James Purnell, are you in fact a heartless, inhuman piece of shit?&quot;

&quot;Very interesting question there, you see-&quot;

&quot;Answer the question, Purnell!&quot;

&quot;No, I am a human being with a conscience!&#039;

*LIE DETECTED*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone remember that daytime TV show &#8220;Lie Detector&#8221; from quite a few years back?  Maybe we should make politicians go on it!  </p>
<p>&#8220;James Purnell, are you in fact a heartless, inhuman piece of shit?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Very interesting question there, you see-&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Answer the question, Purnell!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;No, I am a human being with a conscience!&#8217;</p>
<p>*LIE DETECTED*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redpesto</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-37782</link>
		<dc:creator>redpesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-37782</guid>
		<description>btw: The reference that links &#039;lie detector&#039; software to sex is via &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://yorkshire-ranter.blogspot.com/2008/12/dr-benway-strikes-again-with-venture.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Yorkshire Ranter&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/b3vnkq&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;

And here&#039;s the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.love-detector.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#039;Love Detector&#039;&lt;/a&gt; website.

&lt;b&gt;Plus!&lt;/b&gt; The story&#039;s on the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/mar/12/voice-analysis-system-vra&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;front page of Technology Guardian&lt;/a&gt; in the dead-tree edition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw: The reference that links &#8216;lie detector&#8217; software to sex is via <a HREF="http://yorkshire-ranter.blogspot.com/2008/12/dr-benway-strikes-again-with-venture.html" rel="nofollow">The Yorkshire Ranter</a> or <a HREF="http://tinyurl.com/b3vnkq" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
<p>And here&#8217;s the <a HREF="http://www.love-detector.com/" rel="nofollow">&#8216;Love Detector&#8217;</a> website.</p>
<p><b>Plus!</b> The story&#8217;s on the <a HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/mar/12/voice-analysis-system-vra" rel="nofollow">front page of Technology Guardian</a> in the dead-tree edition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatterface</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-37759</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatterface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-37759</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no lawyer but isn&#039;t evidence discovered as a result of procedural irregularities tainted and therefore inadmissable? 

In other words, if someone is found to have been working in reciept of benefits as a result of an investigation following suspicions raised by lie detector tests, and those tests are later thrown out, would the later evidence be thrown out too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no lawyer but isn&#8217;t evidence discovered as a result of procedural irregularities tainted and therefore inadmissable? </p>
<p>In other words, if someone is found to have been working in reciept of benefits as a result of an investigation following suspicions raised by lie detector tests, and those tests are later thrown out, would the later evidence be thrown out too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayyan</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-37757</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-37757</guid>
		<description>Lie detectors to catch benefit claimants???  They&#039;re not serious are they???

Next, Jack Straw will be saying we should do away with juries and pass criminal sentences based on polygraph results.

Unbelievable.  Well done for exposing these buffoons!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lie detectors to catch benefit claimants???  They&#8217;re not serious are they???</p>
<p>Next, Jack Straw will be saying we should do away with juries and pass criminal sentences based on polygraph results.</p>
<p>Unbelievable.  Well done for exposing these buffoons!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-37755</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-37755</guid>
		<description>19: Polygraph tests aren&#039;t admissible evidence in a court because of doubts over accuracy so why use them for benefit claims? I do suppose that if someone is hauled into court over claims of benefit fraud, the case will be thrown out because of this legality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>19: Polygraph tests aren&#8217;t admissible evidence in a court because of doubts over accuracy so why use them for benefit claims? I do suppose that if someone is hauled into court over claims of benefit fraud, the case will be thrown out because of this legality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Penny</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-37753</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-37753</guid>
		<description>*applause*
I think I love you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*applause*<br />
I think I love you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatterface</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-37737</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatterface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-37737</guid>
		<description>Phones already have a way of showing if someone loves you or not. 

If they don&#039;t call back they don&#039;t love you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phones already have a way of showing if someone loves you or not. </p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t call back they don&#8217;t love you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redpesto</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-37736</link>
		<dc:creator>redpesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-37736</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this the same technology used to &#039;tell&#039; whether someone is in love with you? (Hmmm...sex and the military: the two great exploiters of new technology)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this the same technology used to &#8216;tell&#8217; whether someone is in love with you? (Hmmm&#8230;sex and the military: the two great exploiters of new technology)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatterface</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/11/liberal-conspiracy-briefing-exposing-the-dwps-lie-detector-testing/#comment-37732</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatterface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=3127#comment-37732</guid>
		<description>Just done a quick search of the apps available for my iPhone: there are 9 claiming to be lie detectors (or at least joke versions of such) so there&#039;s definitely a market for this shit.

I should imagine they would be a great way to screw up a relationship so hopefully natural selection will weed the users out eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just done a quick search of the apps available for my iPhone: there are 9 claiming to be lie detectors (or at least joke versions of such) so there&#8217;s definitely a market for this shit.</p>
<p>I should imagine they would be a great way to screw up a relationship so hopefully natural selection will weed the users out eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

