Published: February 19th 2009 - at 9:29 am

Help stop family court fees increasing


by Michael Robinson    

Last year, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) started its plans to make the courts self-funding. The cost of application fees payable by local authorities in care and adoption proceedings increased by an impressive 3200%, from £150 to £4,825.

Hidden on the website of Her Majesty’s Court Service is a consultation paper on plans to increase fees payable in civil court proceedings including enforcement fees in the family courts. The closing date for consultations is 4th March 2009.

Justice in the family courts is already suffering. Legal aid cutbacks have led to fewer firms of solicitors being prepared to undertake funded work and the Legal Services Commission’s funding for contact activities being cut from April.

CAFCASS (the court welfare service) received three critical inspection reports from OFSTED in 2008 but are being asked to take responsibility for a host of new services with little additional funding. In some areas, if a Judge asks for a welfare report into a family’s circumstances, there is already a 20 week delay before a CAFCASS officer can even be allocated.

In Sept ’08, an article in The Times covering a day in the life of Mr Justice Hedley recorded: ‘presented with four lever-arch files, Mr Justice Hedley had just minutes to grapple with the new case. In one month he has dealt with about 100 such cases.‘ When mistakes are made due to there being limited time to consider evidence or due to a poorly conducted CAFCASS investigation, the costs of appealing a judgment are already prohibitive.

Application fees and the cost of a transcript (required for making an appeal) can easily be over £1,000, and that is before the cost of solicitors and barristers. The family courts are becoming the preserve of the very rich or poor (but only if legal aid solicitor can be found).

In 2007, UNICEF found the United Kingdom to have the unhappiest children in the developed world. February’s Research Report from the Children’s Society concluded that children are 40% more likely to suffer mental health problems if denied contact with their fathers.

Their research confirms earlier studies (PDF) which showed that children do better academically where both parents are involved in their education. The researchers expressed concern that 28% of non-resident parents lose contact with their children after having been separated for three years.

When one parent blocks contact, the children suffer until their parents can access the courts, but the courts are becoming increasingly inaccessible.

The Government is failing in its duty under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of a Child to support a child’s right to both parents. Cuts to legal aid and court services, a lack of funding/resources for CAFCASS and increases to court fees go entirely against the state’s legal duty under the Convention.

As a first step, the increases to court fees in family cases need to be stopped, and better, abolished entirely. I would ask you to join me in replying to the Government’s consultation paper, and details can be found on my website www.thecustodyminefield.com.


---------------------------
    Share on Tumblr  


About the author
This is a guest post. Michael Robinson is founder of the website The Custody Minefield and author of a book of the same name.
· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: Blog ,Health ,Westminster


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


Access to the family courts should be a right for all parents and not limited to those with the ability to pay the unreasonable state dictated costs in seeking the justice those of us in this so called democratic country expect and have a right to. Clearly this Government does not concur with this fundamental tenet. Michael Robinson is right – it is time to challenge the Government as they are simply failing children and those unfortunate parents desperately needing the so called family justice system to ensure and secure their ongoing relationship with their children.

Astounding that the govt are bent on increasing fees even further from the present extortionate rates for child related welfare decisions in the Courts.

Hardly a Govt that puts children first and foremost.

Here we are heading into economic oblivion and children and their families are being further ill-served by a policy decision of govt to restrict access to justice, beggars belief.

About time this was tackled. Can anyone imagine being charged to bring a child to a doctor or being charged to ask leave to do so?
This is the equivalent of what is happening in the family court system. Those of us unfortunate to need the courts to safeguard the welfare of our children and ensure they have a full relationshhip with both parents are facing hardship and even bankruptcy for doing so.
Where legal aid is available, it often pays for poor representation and is, in any case, unfairly assessed and available to few. Like the police service, this should be paid for out of taxes
When family justice and child welfare are dependent on ability to pay, the govenment is indirectly guilty of child abuse and abuse of basic human rights.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    New blog post: Help stop family court fees increasing http://tinyurl.com/de3of7





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
LATEST COMMENT PIECES
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
» Incidents like this shame us all
» Taxpayers Alliance want to cut taxes, mostly for the rich
» We’re turning The Spirit Level into a film: help us in that goal






15 Comments



36 Comments



10 Comments



24 Comments



22 Comments



69 Comments



44 Comments



25 Comments



13 Comments



30 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» George W posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people

» bluepillnation posted on The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think

» Cylux posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people

» Just Visiting posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem

» Robin Levett posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem

» Trooper Thompson posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people

» Just Visiting posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» steveb posted on Incidents like this shame us all

» Chaise Guevara posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem

» Just Visiting posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people

» harleyrider1978 posted on The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself

» Peter Woodford posted on Angry about absurdly high pay? Here's what to do about it

» x posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem

» Cylux posted on The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself

» the a&e charge nurse posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem