<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shadow cabinet meets, online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/01/05/shadow-cabinet-meets-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/01/05/shadow-cabinet-meets-online/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:47:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisdair Cameron</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/01/05/shadow-cabinet-meets-online/#comment-29258</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisdair Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1845#comment-29258</guid>
		<description>It won’t help them win the election though, will it?
.I do hope not, otherwise Rick Astley (or whatever that month&#039;s meme is) will win by a landslide.
The first one at least is just a gag that only the relatively politically savvy will really get, and I&#039;ll wager that they&#039;re more independent or already committed than to be swayed by a widget.Oh, and only die-hards, probably with die-hard readerships will embed the widget on their sites or blogs. Not a bad gag, but not great campaigning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won’t help them win the election though, will it?<br />
.I do hope not, otherwise Rick Astley (or whatever that month&#8217;s meme is) will win by a landslide.<br />
The first one at least is just a gag that only the relatively politically savvy will really get, and I&#8217;ll wager that they&#8217;re more independent or already committed than to be swayed by a widget.Oh, and only die-hards, probably with die-hard readerships will embed the widget on their sites or blogs. Not a bad gag, but not great campaigning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayyan</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/01/05/shadow-cabinet-meets-online/#comment-29242</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1845#comment-29242</guid>
		<description>Me thinks they&#039;ve been taking their cue from the excellent 236.com&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.236.com/news/2008/08/20/if_they_imd_obamas_vp_prospect_1_8389.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IM&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.236.com/news/2008/09/02/if_they_imd_loser_vps_1_8648.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;send-ups&lt;/a&gt;.  Did Labour&#039;s staffers do anything except follow the US elections all summer and autumn?  I know I didn&#039;t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me thinks they&#8217;ve been taking their cue from the excellent 236.com&#8217;s <a href="http://www.236.com/news/2008/08/20/if_they_imd_obamas_vp_prospect_1_8389.php" rel="nofollow">IM</a> <a href="http://www.236.com/news/2008/09/02/if_they_imd_loser_vps_1_8648.php" rel="nofollow">send-ups</a>.  Did Labour&#8217;s staffers do anything except follow the US elections all summer and autumn?  I know I didn&#8217;t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayyan</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/01/05/shadow-cabinet-meets-online/#comment-29241</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1845#comment-29241</guid>
		<description>Still quite funny though!  The Lib Dems&#039; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.libdems.org.uk/get_involved/online-tools&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;online buttons&lt;/a&gt; are slightly more mature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still quite funny though!  The Lib Dems&#8217; <a href="http://www.libdems.org.uk/get_involved/online-tools" rel="nofollow">online buttons</a> are slightly more mature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Griffin</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2009/01/05/shadow-cabinet-meets-online/#comment-29230</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1845#comment-29230</guid>
		<description>That...is awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8230;is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

