<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How does Hillary Clinton matter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/12/02/how-does-hillary-clinton-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/12/02/how-does-hillary-clinton-matter/</link>
	<description>creating a new liberal-left force</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:14:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/12/02/how-does-hillary-clinton-matter/#comment-26219</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1699#comment-26219</guid>
		<description>Elaine,

Thank you, and you&#039;re completely right to bring out the potential practical benefits of exercising &#039;soft power&#039;.

I also agree with you about how irritating the simplistic &#039;hawk/dove&#039; descriptions are. Foreign policy analysis needs a few more words at its disposal than simply describing people as one of two different types of bird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elaine,</p>
<p>Thank you, and you&#8217;re completely right to bring out the potential practical benefits of exercising &#8217;soft power&#8217;.</p>
<p>I also agree with you about how irritating the simplistic &#8216;hawk/dove&#8217; descriptions are. Foreign policy analysis needs a few more words at its disposal than simply describing people as one of two different types of bird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Gates And &#8216;Soft Power&#8217;&#8230; &#171; Back Towards The Locus</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/12/02/how-does-hillary-clinton-matter/#comment-26202</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Gates And &#8216;Soft Power&#8217;&#8230; &#171; Back Towards The Locus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1699#comment-26202</guid>
		<description>[...] 3, 2008   Over at Liberal Conspiracy, Neil Robertson is untroubled by Obama&#8217;s recent appointments&#8230; &#8220;By giving Samantha Power a role in shaping the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3, 2008   Over at Liberal Conspiracy, Neil Robertson is untroubled by Obama&#8217;s recent appointments&#8230; &#8220;By giving Samantha Power a role in shaping the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/12/02/how-does-hillary-clinton-matter/#comment-26196</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1699#comment-26196</guid>
		<description>Clinton is  fantastically shrewd choice. She can&#039;t run against an administration she&#039;s part of in 2012 (especially if it&#039;s as successful at governing as it is at campaigning) and if she fucks up and is dumped her chance at being President will completely shot to shit. 

Her best hope now is to do a good job, and hope she&#039;s in good health for a 2016 run (she&#039;ll be 69). Brilliant move by Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton is  fantastically shrewd choice. She can&#8217;t run against an administration she&#8217;s part of in 2012 (especially if it&#8217;s as successful at governing as it is at campaigning) and if she fucks up and is dumped her chance at being President will completely shot to shit. </p>
<p>Her best hope now is to do a good job, and hope she&#8217;s in good health for a 2016 run (she&#8217;ll be 69). Brilliant move by Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny Hundal</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/12/02/how-does-hillary-clinton-matter/#comment-26192</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Hundal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1699#comment-26192</guid>
		<description>Good article. And I&#039;m still unsure why some people are jumping on the Clinton appointment as the coming of Bush Part 2.

The current Secretary of State is Condoleezza Rice. Does anyone seriously believe she is carrying out her own foreign policy independent of Bush and Cheney? Its absurd to think Clinton is going to go off on her own while Obama will have different plans. 

She is highly intelligent and commands strong support - she is right for the job. Some of the lefties in the US increasingly sound like the Trots here, its worrying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. And I&#8217;m still unsure why some people are jumping on the Clinton appointment as the coming of Bush Part 2.</p>
<p>The current Secretary of State is Condoleezza Rice. Does anyone seriously believe she is carrying out her own foreign policy independent of Bush and Cheney? Its absurd to think Clinton is going to go off on her own while Obama will have different plans. </p>
<p>She is highly intelligent and commands strong support &#8211; she is right for the job. Some of the lefties in the US increasingly sound like the Trots here, its worrying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/12/02/how-does-hillary-clinton-matter/#comment-26186</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1699#comment-26186</guid>
		<description>Interesting and thoughtful post.  I like the attention to specific detail; one of Obama&#039;s strengths was his considered approach to nuclear non-proliferation.

I would also underscore heavily your point re Hillary Clinton&#039;s track record on and prioritisation of women&#039;s rights.  When people talk about &#039;soft power and non-military means&#039;, one would expect them to talk about approaches to development as well, but almost no commentator here in the UK has done so. .  And yet women&#039;s empowerment and education are critical to any sustainable development strategy and fundamental to poverty reduction(including notions of pro-poor growth), improving health and envirnomental  protection. The fact that she has been at the forefront on these issues can mean a very signficant &#039;change&#039; and a progressive one to boot!!

Thank you. Over on CiF and elsewhere, people remain captivated by the CDS narratives while mired in simplistic characterisations of Clinton as a &#039;hawk&#039; or Kissingerist as opposed to Obama as some undefined &#039;good.&#039;  It will be interesting to see how specific policies are developed and then played out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and thoughtful post.  I like the attention to specific detail; one of Obama&#8217;s strengths was his considered approach to nuclear non-proliferation.</p>
<p>I would also underscore heavily your point re Hillary Clinton&#8217;s track record on and prioritisation of women&#8217;s rights.  When people talk about &#8217;soft power and non-military means&#8217;, one would expect them to talk about approaches to development as well, but almost no commentator here in the UK has done so. .  And yet women&#8217;s empowerment and education are critical to any sustainable development strategy and fundamental to poverty reduction(including notions of pro-poor growth), improving health and envirnomental  protection. The fact that she has been at the forefront on these issues can mean a very signficant &#8216;change&#8217; and a progressive one to boot!!</p>
<p>Thank you. Over on CiF and elsewhere, people remain captivated by the CDS narratives while mired in simplistic characterisations of Clinton as a &#8216;hawk&#8217; or Kissingerist as opposed to Obama as some undefined &#8216;good.&#8217;  It will be interesting to see how specific policies are developed and then played out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Heath</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/12/02/how-does-hillary-clinton-matter/#comment-26183</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1699#comment-26183</guid>
		<description>Excellent post.

Its reason and brilliance is demonstrated by the lack of opposition.

I think that Obama will upset liberals and conservatives alike. He&#039;s a moderate and a realist - which is never welcome in our divided &lt;em&gt;body politic&lt;/em&gt;.

America - and the wider world - needs much more than partisan talking points. The U.S., like the UK and beyond, is a mess. Guide us, someone...please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post.</p>
<p>Its reason and brilliance is demonstrated by the lack of opposition.</p>
<p>I think that Obama will upset liberals and conservatives alike. He&#8217;s a moderate and a realist &#8211; which is never welcome in our divided <em>body politic</em>.</p>
<p>America &#8211; and the wider world &#8211; needs much more than partisan talking points. The U.S., like the UK and beyond, is a mess. Guide us, someone&#8230;please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjcjc</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/12/02/how-does-hillary-clinton-matter/#comment-26143</link>
		<dc:creator>cjcjc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1699#comment-26143</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The only question now is whether he will.&lt;/i&gt;

Could the contrast between US and UK politics be any greater than it is now?

This will be fascinating to watch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The only question now is whether he will.</i></p>
<p>Could the contrast between US and UK politics be any greater than it is now?</p>
<p>This will be fascinating to watch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
