Sometimes I envy people this stupid. Then I realise that it would mean spending my whole life in a red-faced rage at EVERYTHING because the Sun told me to.

Hint: The Sun is owned by a trillionaire, staffed by public schoolboys on £100,000+ and fucking HATES the working class, which it sees as only fit for milking of its cash, you losers. Get a grip.

Why are so-called liberals intolerant of anyone that doesn’t toe the line?

Er, because they disagree with them?

Simple: Because a thorough an honest examination of welfare addiction would seriously disturb and perhaps destroy their entire worldviews. They like to think they are the ones on the side of the downtrodden when it is in fact untrue. They ‘care’ about the poor only in a crude and disembodied way. That is why they stupidly conflate prejudice against chavs or scum (by that I mean people who choose to walk, talk, dress and conduct themselves in a vulgar and degenerate way eg. The stray dog lifestyle of some single mums) with ordinary working class people. It doesnt even compute to them that working-class people can and do often behave themsleves in a dignified way. When I was living in Africa the people there are poorer than anywhere in Britian and yet they do not lead such souless, debased and useless lives as do members of the growing British scum-class.

If Matthews and Donovan are found guilty, they will hardly be role models for the proles, but do compare it to the coverage of the McCains. They, I hasten to add, did not consciously mistreat Madeline or allow her to be abducted. Instead there was a blithe assumption that they could leave her in a separate property whilst they socialized in a tapas bar – imagine Donovan or Matthews leaving Shannon alone whilst they drank at a pub.

The McCains’ actions do not compare to the alleged offences of Matthews and Donovan, but media reporting can be compared. See a certain British newspaper’s reporting of “fury” over doubts express. Recall the press calls for British Police to take-over a Portuguese investigation, or the belief that this case merited the personal attention of the Pope.

Now we have a pair of not-very-bright, not-very-pretty proles who may have hoodwinked The Sun. It’s going to be ugly.

Just as it was ugly for Robert Murat.

“why donesn’t one of you…… zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Go back to your swamp troll. Nobody is interested in your views.

Nor do I think that the Sun could be said to be ‘stepping into the breach’. that’s just propaganda. The difference in coverage between Madeline and Shannon was well documented at the time, with much hand-wringing from the liberal media and The Sun’s reward for Shannon much less than the fund raised for Madeline.

http://mymarilyn.blogspot.com/2008/11/right-wing-bile-on-baby-p-case.html

Instead, it tried to run with a ‘positive’ story on the housing project where the “family” lived; waffling on about the ‘improvements’ that had taken place thanks to the local council’s having spent 5 million on it. That way, the blindingly obvious problem of the animalistic family arrangements could be ignored instead of denied. It’s funny how the The Sun, a paper whose readership is badly educated, more acurately described the project as “like Beirut – only worse”

Yeah, great one guys!, just throw money at it, everything will be just fine. Who cares if children either have 5 different ‘fathers’ every year?

I presume your use of the headline “It Was The Sun Wot Manufactured It” – note “manufactured”, not “prolonged” – is an ironic play on the way that tabloids tend to sensationalise things.

Or maybe it’s a scandalous misrepresentation because the people who manufactured it were in fact the kidnappers, whoever they were.

I favour the latter. Not one of your best Robert.

http://www.lettersfromatory.com

It has always been a fundamental problem of the let that the self appointed progressive or fabian element despise the people whose votes they rely on .