THREE million people on the dole in Britain; symbolically speaking, that figure still represents some kind of benchmark, bringing to mind all those sepia photographs of 1930s hunger marches and memories of the grimmest years of rampant Thatcherism.
Well, dust off those Right to Work Campaign and People’s March for Jobs badges; several leading forecasters are predicting that unemployment is set to return to that level by 2010.
It is my own direct experience of being an unemployed school-leaver that, more than anything else, galvanized me into political involvement and gave me a set of socialist convictions that I have somehow sustained into middle age.
For me, the number one item on the charge sheet against capitalism is that it can – and regularly does – leave so many people out of work. Never mind the criminal waste of human potential; the social cost of the devastation of entire communities is simply beyond the capacity of economists to measure.
Even during the boom years since 1992, unemployment has remained a sinister presence looming in the background. I think I’m right in saying that the official count never fell below one million, a figure that would have been considered politically unsustainable throughout the post-war consensus period. That is what we have been asked to consider as ‘full employment’.
And of course, the official count is virtually meaningless. On some estimates, as many as one in four British men of working age are either unemployed or economically inactive.
Despite all that Blairite guff about flexible labour markets, Britain’s job creation record is among the worst in the EU. Jobs have continually been lost through financially driven mergers and acquisitions, downsizing, low investment, bad training, the pursuit of short term profit goals, high dividend payments and poor management.
To read that an extra £100m is being made available for retraining those made redundant as a result of the impending downturn really sums up the inadequacy of existing plans. That is just one 370th of the money that has been made available for the bank bail-out.
Surely a Labour government can be far more ambitious than that? If public ownership is seen as a panacea for the financial services sector, for instance, why not extend the approach to companies that insist they have no alternative to declaring mass redundancies? Would not such social investment be a better use of resources than funding ever-extending queues outside Britain’s Jobcentres?
Recent weeks have seen the three word mantra ‘whatever it takes’ gain currency as a political soundbite, perhaps designed to flag up a resolute approach to keeping the credit system going.
But if Labour can do whatever it takes for the City, it can and should do whatever it takes to keep people working.
Or is it only Royal Bank of Scotland, Lloyds TSB and HBOS that can expect the British state to provide a rock of stability?
| Post to del.icio.us |
I dunno Dave, I agree the govt should take measures to promote employment in these circumstances that it wouldn’t normally take (because they don’t work, long-term) and you are right that the share of profits in income has risen in recent years (which is one way of interpreting your idea that fewer jobs have been created through profit seeking), so really I don’t want to take issue with your argument here. But you make a bunch of claims here that could use some backing up. Where’s the job creation data? Jobs lost through a lack of investment? That needs some explaining; investment (in automation) can destroy jobs. Of course mergers are financially driven, but they do not always lead to an increase in profits, and remember that ultimately it is only increases in productivity that create increases in the real wage. Jobs lost through downsizing? Isn’t that like saying jobs being lost through jobs being lost? Plus, it doesn’t make sense to say ‘you did this for the City, now do this for the unemployed’ because what was done for ‘the City’ was done to try and reduce the risk of a titanic recession and loss of jobs – i.e. it was done for the unemployed (prevention thereof). (oh, and there’s the usual category mistake of comparing money spent acquiring assets with money spent purchasing a service – training – which is so commonplace it hardly bears mentioning).
Ouch Luis!
One of the, many, things that I like about Liberal Conspiracy is that we can be rude about what people write, without being rude about them.
It’s a pity we have to go through these period but sadly so many firms and companies are running on empty with no capital, in my area the only work now is retail, but Labour has come up with a grand idea, it has stated that perhaps digging coal might save poor communities, if he thinks I would return to a mine for £5.70 an hour he is joking it’s worth at least £15 an hour.
But it is sad to see firms bought by over sea’s companies now closing because it’s cheaper here then say in America.
oh dear, I didn’t mean to be rude (certainly not to Dave, and hopefully not even to his argument) – on second look, the crack about downsizing was unwarranted – it’s a perfectly sensible way of just saying that jobs have been destroyed as companies cut costs.
“But it is sad to see firms bought by over sea’s companies now closing because it’s cheaper here then say in America.”
Err, cite?
I am sure that Dave will forgive you Luis – economism is the dismal science after all!
I am a couple of years younger than him, but remember the same experiences of youth unemployment. For me though “the number one charge against capitalism” is the British weather. I hated all that rain when I was growing up under Thatcher. And the way it got dark so early as well. Here in Brazil we have glorious sunshine all year around. It must be because we have a left-wing president.
I think I will go for a swim now.
Cite look your bloody self, I have.
I am concerned about UNEMPLOYMENT
I think we need to stand behind Gordon Brown with solidity while he solves problems for us and the world.No-one has done better for our economy so far, and I am certain that he has the courage and new ideas to change the country and the world for the better and in favour of the poor of this world.
UNEMPLOYMENT does not have to be
Let us develop a petion on line at No10’s website as follows:
May I request that the Prime Minister rules in the Kenysian tools in this recession – so the the building industry remains in a sensible shape? Gordon Brown said he will do whatever it takes to deal with the financial system, but can we have that on this as well? Keyne was forsaken twice by this nation, in the 30s, and by John Major (No qulaifications beyond schooling – no university or historical perspective!) conservatives want to do it 3rd TIME, notice how all their speeches say how there was too much spent in the past so we have no reserves to spend in bad times, THIS IS CRAP and frightening to me as a qualified Economist. It is John Major once again. Can the Gordon who obtained a double first explain the bullshit in this thinking please?
Can others who are learned support this forum?
I lost 18 years of my prime life becasue of John Majors hammer to crack a nut approach, and I hope Gordon is given a chance to correct the wrong done then, so that the tools can be used to remove human misery in the future throughout the world.
You have a Labour government who actually took advice from Thatcher carried on using Thatchers policies and her money policies and you moan about Major for god sake.
Hi Dave
How come 3 million British citizens are on the Dole while foreigners step off the plane into a job within a week? I don’t for one second believe that unemployment is at all an issue in the UK in the 7 years I have been here. If you want to work there is work – it may not be what you like doing but its there for the taking just like most of those 3 million people are taking the piss……
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
| 3 Comments 18 Comments 15 Comments 19 Comments 9 Comments 26 Comments 56 Comments 67 Comments 2 Comments 47 Comments | LATEST COMMENTS » Guy Aitchison posted on Power 2010 in action in Harrow » Jailhouselawyer posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Lee Griffin posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » ukliberty posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Bob B posted on Time to re-think the Dangerous Dogs Act » Bob B posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » crusade posted on Against multiculturalism » crusade posted on Against multiculturalism » Jailhouselawyer posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Sevillista posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » selwyn marock posted on Time to re-think the Dangerous Dogs Act » ukliberty posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » ukliberty posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » W.L. posted on Time to re-think the Dangerous Dogs Act » Bob B posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. Last 50 // Comments feed |