<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London 2012: Cheap &#8216;n&#8217; quiet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/london-2012-cheap-n-quiet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/london-2012-cheap-n-quiet/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Bienkov</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/london-2012-cheap-n-quiet/#comment-22234</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bienkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/london-2012-cheap-n-quiet/#comment-22234</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s important to remember that the budget was set long before Boris was elected and contains over a billion pounds worth of contingency.

Boris isn&#039;t actually announcing anything new here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to remember that the budget was set long before Boris was elected and contains over a billion pounds worth of contingency.</p>
<p>Boris isn&#8217;t actually announcing anything new here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Killingworth</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/london-2012-cheap-n-quiet/#comment-22229</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Killingworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/london-2012-cheap-n-quiet/#comment-22229</guid>
		<description>The problem is that if a project &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; to be completed by a certain time, you can&#039;t maintain cost control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that if a project <i>has</i> to be completed by a certain time, you can&#8217;t maintain cost control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Heath</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/london-2012-cheap-n-quiet/#comment-22199</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/london-2012-cheap-n-quiet/#comment-22199</guid>
		<description>Okay the construction aspect of the MD may have gone to plan, but the project itself - the dome as a going concern and the £1m-per-month maintenance costs over the 6-years it sat empty, suggests we have a lot to worry about.

&lt;em&gt;construction’s going to be in its worst recession for decades over the next 4 years&lt;/em&gt;

Excellent point. 

However, regardless of the supply and demand of construction workers (also remember major projects are probably already approved), the urgency of completion may give power to the construction companies, who in a difficult market, may see the Olympic park as a cash cow.

I hope you&#039;re right, John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay the construction aspect of the MD may have gone to plan, but the project itself &#8211; the dome as a going concern and the £1m-per-month maintenance costs over the 6-years it sat empty, suggests we have a lot to worry about.</p>
<p><em>construction’s going to be in its worst recession for decades over the next 4 years</em></p>
<p>Excellent point. </p>
<p>However, regardless of the supply and demand of construction workers (also remember major projects are probably already approved), the urgency of completion may give power to the construction companies, who in a difficult market, may see the Olympic park as a cash cow.</p>
<p>I hope you&#8217;re right, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john b</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/london-2012-cheap-n-quiet/#comment-22198</link>
		<dc:creator>john b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/london-2012-cheap-n-quiet/#comment-22198</guid>
		<description>I share your scepticism to a degree, on the other hand:
1) the Dome was actually built to time and budget, just the exhibition inside wasn&#039;t any good
2) construction&#039;s going to be in its worst recession for decades over the next 4 years, so contractors and staff bidding up costs aren&#039;t going to be as much of a problem as expected when the bid was made</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share your scepticism to a degree, on the other hand:<br />
1) the Dome was actually built to time and budget, just the exhibition inside wasn&#8217;t any good<br />
2) construction&#8217;s going to be in its worst recession for decades over the next 4 years, so contractors and staff bidding up costs aren&#8217;t going to be as much of a problem as expected when the bid was made</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

