<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Redwood: let the banking system collapse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:40:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Now that we&#8217;re owners &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/#comment-22240</link>
		<dc:creator>Now that we&#8217;re owners &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1403#comment-22240</guid>
		<description>[...] have a strict policy of no personal abuse on this blog, and I now find  (thanks to Dave Osler on Liberal Conspiracy) that I have described John Redwood as a fruit-loop market fundamentalist. Can I just say that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have a strict policy of no personal abuse on this blog, and I now find  (thanks to Dave Osler on Liberal Conspiracy) that I have described John Redwood as a fruit-loop market fundamentalist. Can I just say that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/#comment-22225</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1403#comment-22225</guid>
		<description>.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/#comment-22224</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1403#comment-22224</guid>
		<description>Well I think it is right to question precisely what we are getting for our money is it not?? Are we going to get regulation that caps bonuses?? Are we going to have savings guranteed?? We will wait and see but I rather think that the answer will be no to both so I see no reason to support this bailout....

&#039;Key elments of the tranistional program&#039;!!! what rot....let&#039;s rewind, this is a bailout to save the system, it isnt a transition to anywhere I am afraid and will most likely fail in any case....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think it is right to question precisely what we are getting for our money is it not?? Are we going to get regulation that caps bonuses?? Are we going to have savings guranteed?? We will wait and see but I rather think that the answer will be no to both so I see no reason to support this bailout&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8216;Key elments of the tranistional program&#8217;!!! what rot&#8230;.let&#8217;s rewind, this is a bailout to save the system, it isnt a transition to anywhere I am afraid and will most likely fail in any case&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/#comment-22223</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1403#comment-22223</guid>
		<description>ok Sally - how much are you prepared to pay to support the banks?   All that Redwood is pointing out is that State intervention will cost money...and someone will have to pay for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok Sally &#8211; how much are you prepared to pay to support the banks?   All that Redwood is pointing out is that State intervention will cost money&#8230;and someone will have to pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/#comment-22219</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1403#comment-22219</guid>
		<description>Paul,

Correct me if I am wrong, I usually am, but my understanding of the &#039;bail-outs&#039; is that the government has nationalised the banks in question. That in cases where there has simply been a run on money, they have taken a large equity stake. Where they have seen the possibility of the market managing it&#039;s own mess HBOS, for instance, it has bent competition laws in favour of stability.

These seem to me to be reasonable interventions, however if there is no meaningful reform as a consequence of this, it will be a complete, utter disgrace,

What are the prospects for re-mutualising B &amp; B, say,  rather than placing it directly back on the market? I&#039;d like to see something positive come out of this, such as Building Societies returning to what they did best. With a clear law that says they can&#039;t ever de-mutualise in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>Correct me if I am wrong, I usually am, but my understanding of the &#8216;bail-outs&#8217; is that the government has nationalised the banks in question. That in cases where there has simply been a run on money, they have taken a large equity stake. Where they have seen the possibility of the market managing it&#8217;s own mess HBOS, for instance, it has bent competition laws in favour of stability.</p>
<p>These seem to me to be reasonable interventions, however if there is no meaningful reform as a consequence of this, it will be a complete, utter disgrace,</p>
<p>What are the prospects for re-mutualising B &amp; B, say,  rather than placing it directly back on the market? I&#8217;d like to see something positive come out of this, such as Building Societies returning to what they did best. With a clear law that says they can&#8217;t ever de-mutualise in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/#comment-22216</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1403#comment-22216</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a fan of Redwood, but I&#039;m concerned that the long shadow of 1929 is being bandied around by bank bosses who see the state as a source of easy money. The end product could be a bankrupt banks AND a bankrupt state with no more money to pay them.

I don&#039;t know what the answer is but I&#039;m concerned that we&#039;re seeing a whole load of money being thrown at the banks without more than a whisper of meaningful reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of Redwood, but I&#8217;m concerned that the long shadow of 1929 is being bandied around by bank bosses who see the state as a source of easy money. The end product could be a bankrupt banks AND a bankrupt state with no more money to pay them.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what the answer is but I&#8217;m concerned that we&#8217;re seeing a whole load of money being thrown at the banks without more than a whisper of meaningful reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/#comment-22213</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1403#comment-22213</guid>
		<description>I think he&#039;s saying the facts fit his &quot;bullshit&quot; better than your truths. The thing about economics is that if you don&#039;t get it, it gets you! Not even the state can ban supply and demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he&#8217;s saying the facts fit his &#8220;bullshit&#8221; better than your truths. The thing about economics is that if you don&#8217;t get it, it gets you! Not even the state can ban supply and demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/#comment-22208</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1403#comment-22208</guid>
		<description>Richard

So what are you saying?  Do you support Redwood bullshit or not ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard</p>
<p>So what are you saying?  Do you support Redwood bullshit or not ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/#comment-22202</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1403#comment-22202</guid>
		<description>&quot;They will never except that FDR had to step in with Govt help&quot;

Only problem with that comment is that FDR&#039;s government help actually did they little to cure the unemployment problem.  Furthermore America experienced a recession within a recession in 1938.  

US unemployment rates:
1930: 8.7%
1931: 15.9%
1932: 23.6%
1933: 24.9%
1934: 21.7%
1935: 20.1.%
1936:16.9%
1937:14.3%
1938:19%
1939:17.2%
1940:14.6%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They will never except that FDR had to step in with Govt help&#8221;</p>
<p>Only problem with that comment is that FDR&#8217;s government help actually did they little to cure the unemployment problem.  Furthermore America experienced a recession within a recession in 1938.  </p>
<p>US unemployment rates:<br />
1930: 8.7%<br />
1931: 15.9%<br />
1932: 23.6%<br />
1933: 24.9%<br />
1934: 21.7%<br />
1935: 20.1.%<br />
1936:16.9%<br />
1937:14.3%<br />
1938:19%<br />
1939:17.2%<br />
1940:14.6%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/#comment-22201</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1403#comment-22201</guid>
		<description>I suppose you could credit Redwood for being consistent.  However,  this really is the bullshit that the far right believe. It is also what Cameron really believed until he got the job  of decontaminating the brand.

But it is the same  belief that the Right had during the Wall street Crash and the Great Depression. They saw no need for intervention, and if people starved to death, well fine, that is free market capitalism. Just as they saw no need for intevention in Ireland during  the  Potato famine. 
They will never  except that FDR had to step in with Govt help.  What they love is the idea of the atomising of society down to individuals. Just think how worried the poor and lower middle classes will be if they are scared that their money will disappear in a flash. It will keep them on their toes, and make them much more likely to obey their masters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose you could credit Redwood for being consistent.  However,  this really is the bullshit that the far right believe. It is also what Cameron really believed until he got the job  of decontaminating the brand.</p>
<p>But it is the same  belief that the Right had during the Wall street Crash and the Great Depression. They saw no need for intervention, and if people starved to death, well fine, that is free market capitalism. Just as they saw no need for intevention in Ireland during  the  Potato famine.<br />
They will never  except that FDR had to step in with Govt help.  What they love is the idea of the atomising of society down to individuals. Just think how worried the poor and lower middle classes will be if they are scared that their money will disappear in a flash. It will keep them on their toes, and make them much more likely to obey their masters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/07/john-redwood-let-the-banking-system-collapse/#comment-22200</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1403#comment-22200</guid>
		<description>&quot;PLANET Vulcan is obviously blessed with an advanced Hayekian economy&quot;

Hayek&#039;s early works actually explained how these sorts of crises occurred.  He would have fingered the low interest rates kept down by the BoE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;PLANET Vulcan is obviously blessed with an advanced Hayekian economy&#8221;</p>
<p>Hayek&#8217;s early works actually explained how these sorts of crises occurred.  He would have fingered the low interest rates kept down by the BoE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

