<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nadine Dorries&#8217; hypocrisy makes news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:40:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayyan</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/#comment-22107</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 06:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1390#comment-22107</guid>
		<description>We should support a progressive candidate to expose her lies on the ground in her own constituency, then smash her at the polls at the next general election.  We need to start reducing the impending Tory majority in 2010!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should support a progressive candidate to expose her lies on the ground in her own constituency, then smash her at the polls at the next general election.  We need to start reducing the impending Tory majority in 2010!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Heath</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/#comment-22081</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1390#comment-22081</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Erm, what’s changed? It was obv no big deal. Your witch hunt against Nadine is essentially sexist in the way the Democrats are sexist against Palin. Wrong kind of woman, and too genuine for her own good.&lt;/em&gt;

Piss-weak. Must try harder.

FAIL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Erm, what’s changed? It was obv no big deal. Your witch hunt against Nadine is essentially sexist in the way the Democrats are sexist against Palin. Wrong kind of woman, and too genuine for her own good.</em></p>
<p>Piss-weak. Must try harder.</p>
<p>FAIL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/#comment-22079</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1390#comment-22079</guid>
		<description>Genuine and correct are not synonyms: Palin/Dorries can say what they honestly believe/believe is right, but this does not make it true. Equally, affirmation is not evidence and assertion is not proof.

Dale is definitely treading a fine line with his assertive partisanship, because while he calculates he gains by riding on the coat-tails of a Conservative upswing, he will lose credibility if he attempts to jumps ship when the political wind shifts, as it always does.

Did anyone else notice the drop-off in the quality of posts made on his diary as he began being taken seriously?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Genuine and correct are not synonyms: Palin/Dorries can say what they honestly believe/believe is right, but this does not make it true. Equally, affirmation is not evidence and assertion is not proof.</p>
<p>Dale is definitely treading a fine line with his assertive partisanship, because while he calculates he gains by riding on the coat-tails of a Conservative upswing, he will lose credibility if he attempts to jumps ship when the political wind shifts, as it always does.</p>
<p>Did anyone else notice the drop-off in the quality of posts made on his diary as he began being taken seriously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leon</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/#comment-22078</link>
		<dc:creator>leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1390#comment-22078</guid>
		<description>Heh this is excellent news, a paper in her constituency getting to see what a piece of shit they have for MP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh this is excellent news, a paper in her constituency getting to see what a piece of shit they have for MP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/#comment-22070</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1390#comment-22070</guid>
		<description>To be a woman in Right wing politics means spending your time supporting ideas that hold back other woman. Same with Blacks. It&#039;s the Clarance Thomas syndrome.  Thomas spends most of his time making rulings that hurt other blacks, and overthrowning gains that have been made since the 60&#039;s. But hey, if getting in to the country club is all that matters to you, this what you must do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be a woman in Right wing politics means spending your time supporting ideas that hold back other woman. Same with Blacks. It&#8217;s the Clarance Thomas syndrome.  Thomas spends most of his time making rulings that hurt other blacks, and overthrowning gains that have been made since the 60&#8242;s. But hey, if getting in to the country club is all that matters to you, this what you must do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/#comment-22068</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1390#comment-22068</guid>
		<description>Pathetic,

&lt;blockquote&gt; Your witch hunt against Nadine is essentially sexist in the way the Democrats are sexist against Palin. Wrong kind of woman, and too genuine for her own good. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

There are a series of things I can&#039;t stand about Palins&#039; politics and her religious beliefs. How the heck is that sexist? You are just using a buzz word to cut off debate. I don&#039;t see John McCain being accused of being racist when he attacks Obamas&#039; positions.  At least, not yet.,....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pathetic,</p>
<blockquote><p> Your witch hunt against Nadine is essentially sexist in the way the Democrats are sexist against Palin. Wrong kind of woman, and too genuine for her own good. </p></blockquote>
<p>There are a series of things I can&#8217;t stand about Palins&#8217; politics and her religious beliefs. How the heck is that sexist? You are just using a buzz word to cut off debate. I don&#8217;t see John McCain being accused of being racist when he attacks Obamas&#8217; positions.  At least, not yet.,&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennie Rigg</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/#comment-22067</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Rigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1390#comment-22067</guid>
		<description>Pathetic, the assertion that if you don&#039;t like Dorries you are sexist, because Dorries represents all women, is the most insidiously sexist bollocks possible. Women should be seen as individuals, rather than representatives of their gender, the way men are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pathetic, the assertion that if you don&#8217;t like Dorries you are sexist, because Dorries represents all women, is the most insidiously sexist bollocks possible. Women should be seen as individuals, rather than representatives of their gender, the way men are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/#comment-22065</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1390#comment-22065</guid>
		<description>Hilarious 

Palin Genuine?

Well  yes, if you think it&#039;s a virtue to be a Right  wing Christian moron who thinks the world is a few thousand years old ,and that man played with dinosaurs like on the Flintstones.  If you think that  being able to see Russia from your window makes you a foreign affairs expert. I can see the moon form my window, but I don’t claim to  an expert   on astronomy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarious </p>
<p>Palin Genuine?</p>
<p>Well  yes, if you think it&#8217;s a virtue to be a Right  wing Christian moron who thinks the world is a few thousand years old ,and that man played with dinosaurs like on the Flintstones.  If you think that  being able to see Russia from your window makes you a foreign affairs expert. I can see the moon form my window, but I don’t claim to  an expert   on astronomy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pathetic</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/#comment-22064</link>
		<dc:creator>Pathetic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1390#comment-22064</guid>
		<description>Erm, what&#039;s changed? It was obv no big deal. Your witch hunt against Nadine is essentially sexist in the way the Democrats are sexist against Palin. Wrong kind of woman, and too genuine for her own good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, what&#8217;s changed? It was obv no big deal. Your witch hunt against Nadine is essentially sexist in the way the Democrats are sexist against Palin. Wrong kind of woman, and too genuine for her own good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pennyred</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/#comment-22062</link>
		<dc:creator>Pennyred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1390#comment-22062</guid>
		<description>*grin*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*grin*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/10/04/nadine-dorries-hypocrisy-makes-news/#comment-22061</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1390#comment-22061</guid>
		<description>Why would Dale not take her word, she is a Tory, and that is all poor little Ian needs to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Dale not take her word, she is a Tory, and that is all poor little Ian needs to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

