What would the blogosphere be without other blogs to gripe about? Harry’s Place continue this fine tradition with a screamer of a post about an image dreamed up by Derek Wall, leader of the Green Party, posted along with an article at the Socialist Unity blog. When I say a screamer of the post, I mean read the comments section; the post itself is fairly anodyne but Harry’s Place seems to be pulling Hayek-style “socialism equals fascism” wannabes by the dozen.
If you’re at a loss to understand what all the fuss could possibly be about and can’t be bothered visiting either site linked to above, look at the following picture:

A bit tasteless it must be said; speaking as someone who would have been imprisoned if not outright murdered by the fascist regimes of Italy or Germany, I must say I infinitely prefer the iron heel of British New Labo-Fascism to its antecedents. Regrettably Harry’s Place completely fail to take to task the actual article to which this image was appended.
An article, it must be said, which rambles somewhat aimlessly before readying a bowl of muesli, some environmentally-friendly cushions and sits itself upon the ground to pull out the sad stories about the death of kings. Not that I am in any way slotting Derek Wall, his Zen Buddhism and job at a private Sixth-form college into a very tired stereotype.
Near as I can ascertain, the article does a whistle-stop tour of the Long Defeat within Labour before asking what’s next, and then proceeding to answer itself with a more eloquently stated variation on “Buggered if I know.” I had hoped for more from the principal male speaker of the Green Party. Are we to confine ourselves to apocalyptic nihilism that conflates New Labour with Nazism but still wonders if the defeat of Labour is about to close a window for left activism?
Even at the level of randomly posed questions, there is no insight offered into why said window might be about to close, or why the whole article is topped by the above picture and the least apposite quote in the world, from Benito Mussolini. Don’t mistake me, I violently dislike New Labour’s ongoing privatisation of the country, but its worryingly sensationalist to equate it with the actions of Mussolini’s government.
Such analysis is of a kind with those on the comments section of the Harry’s Place article equate socialism with fascism because they bear some similar features, or features which are assumed to be similar such as state-control of the economy. Considerations as to structural differences – in the alignment of the petit-bourgeoisie or lumpenproletariat do not trouble the inventors of these analogies.
It is the same with Derek Wall and his line-drawing exercise between Labour and fascism. There is no massive economic crisis, there is no rising far right; a decline in the rate of economic growth is barely even a recession by many reckonings. Similarly, the skirmishes with the BNP are nothing like the organised expressions of middle class despair that the Italian fascisti represented. Indeed these sections of society are the very opposite of organised, as current political events prove.
The two and a half mainstream parties still exercise an almost universal appeal to those sections of the middle classes that bother to vote, especially if one adds a right-bourgeois party like UKIP to the mix for European elections. It is among the dissident working class where the outright fascists have been gaining some electoral success, largely because of the vacuum in genuine socialistic organisations among the working class.
Apart from the cheap rhetorical points scored off equating Labour with the fascists, all under the rather vacuous title that “People are pissed at us” I don’t really see the point in the exercise. I read on Wikipedia that one of Derek Wall’s books was supposed to have focused on the history of the anti-capitalist movement, including the Marxist left. Evidently such erudition has had little effect because these viewpoints aren’t so much off the Wall as off the edge of the map, without a compass.
| Post to del.icio.us |
Well, as I have argued before, the Green’s can hardly speak, being fascists themselves with a bearded face: http://www.samizdata.net/blog/archives/2008/02/vote_green_go_b.html
But there are grounds for calling New Labour fascists of a sort. While socialism nationalises property, fascism permits private property but has the state choose what you can do with it – this is the direction of New Labour’s economic policy. Socially, it lacks the spiky bits of systematic concentration camps, ethnic cleansing, permanent detention without trial (though getting longer), and we don’t yet have papers to show apart from at borders (but coming soon!), which is why concur with No2Id’s Guy Herbert’s description of “soft fascism”: http://www.samizdata.net/blog/archives/2008/08/like_your_manif_1.html
Hmmm. Greens taking a leaf out of the ‘bloggertarian’ book?!?
Just want to point out that Derek Wall isn’t the leader of the Green Party. We’ll be electing our first leader later this week…
I’m confused. There are a couple of comments on the HP post saying something about how socialism entails the integration of corporations and the state, but I see no “pulling Hayek-style “socialism equals fascism” wannabes by the dozen.” I gather you dislike HP, but your dig appears unwarranted here. Plus the intro about them griping about other blogs looks very lame, because that’s just what you go on to do yourself.
A lot of the stuff on HP is the standard Green bashing, which is what you expect. There seems to a visceral hatred of the Greens among the denizens of HP, both left and right, for some reason.
I have to say though that whatever the merit’s of Wall’s article the illustration is bloody stupid. You just shouldn’t use the swastika lightly.
I think HP should review their comments policy. Just as the Guardian is responsible for everything that appears in the comments box at CiF, they are responsible for what they allow to remain on their website. I have been called an antisemite there twice and, the night before I went to Afghanistan, someone charmingly expressed the wish that I be attacked while I was there. I got the first comment off after threatening legal action, but was told that I just had to develop a thicker skin about the other two (including the one about being attacked). As David T presumably knows, freedom of expression carries with it duties and responsibilities and is not just a licence to say things about people that they don’t want to hear.
Having said which I think the Greens deserve to be taken to task for the above picture which is ridiculously offensive. It is exactly this kind of banal misrepresentation of other people’s views and trivialisation of real suffering and evil that so cheapens political discourse.
Yep – smoking bans, passive agressive social pressure to conform to an intruisive pro-environment, pro-health socialist agenda, the private made public, state interventions in every aspect of life, special rights for selected ethnic groups, a multiplication of state agencies and agents, the criminalisation of off meassage speech, marginalisation of the self sufficient nuclear family, the denigration of history, the marginalisation of religion, the abuse of science, the labelling of non-conformity as mental illness, what on earth have nulab got in common with fascism………………………..
Oh jeez, you libertarians really love the word ‘fascist’ eh…
fascism originated in Italy, the swastika was popularised as a symbol of nazism in Germany – are they really part of the same thing?
*scratches head in a slightly perplexed manner*
…from a 1930’s era pamphlet…
socialism: you have two cows – you give one to your neighbour.
fascism: you have two cows – you keep them both and give the milk to the government, which sells part of it back to you.
communism: you have two cows – you give both to the government and they give yu some of the milk back.
nazism: you have two cows – the government shoots you and takes them both.
social democracy: you have two cows – the government shoots one, milks the other and pours the milk down the drain.
capital democracy: you have two cows – you sell one and buy a bull.
Give muesli a break, it’s a good breakfast.
“Well, as I have argued before, the Green’s [sic] can hardly speak, being fascists themselves with a bearded face:”
You know you’re in trouble when this is the first post in a thread. And I’m pretty sure Derek Wall doesn’t have a beard.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
| 5 Comments 18 Comments 15 Comments 19 Comments 9 Comments 26 Comments 56 Comments 67 Comments 2 Comments 47 Comments | LATEST COMMENTS » Earnest Ernest posted on Contra Stimulus! » Khrystyna Khodakiv posted on DNA Sampling: Wrong in principle, wrong in practice » Attila Schnapka posted on DNA Sampling: Wrong in principle, wrong in practice » Jailhouselawyer posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism » Lee Griffin posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Lee Griffin posted on Against multiculturalism » Kane L posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Lee Griffin posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Lee Griffin posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Kane L posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Just Visiting posted on Against multiculturalism » Just Visiting posted on Against multiculturalism » Jailhouselawyer posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election » Kane L posted on Why I'm not voting at the next election Last 50 // Comments feed |