Comments on: Top Stories and Blog Review – September 1st 2008 http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/ Left-wing news, opinion and activism Wed, 02 Dec 2015 19:06:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.11 By: Lee Griffin http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19875 Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:57:47 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19875 I think Obama said it best, and hopefully many will take his lead.

]]>
By: Aaron Heath http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19874 Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:49:12 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19874 From Politico ::

Palin, who portrays herself as a fiscal conservative, racked up nearly $20 million in long-term debt as mayor of the tiny town of Wasilla — that amounts to $3,000 per resident.

via.

]]>
By: Aaron Heath http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19873 Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:46:31 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19873 Is she pregnant again, or are these crossed stories?

]]>
By: Jennie Rigg http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19866 Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:34:18 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19866 I think Debi has said it better than I could with regard to the ethics of talking about Bristol…

]]>
By: Aaron Heath http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19855 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:14:48 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19855 The real attack on Pallin is the “bridge to no-where”.

She actually campaigned for office on a pro-bridge platform, yet on her Veep acceptance speech, claimed to have opposed it (to forward her reform image).

I see that being a valuable attack-ad.

]]>
By: Lee Griffin http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19853 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:24:37 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19853 I love the idea that this is a “cover-up” worth pursuing. God forbid a mother hide her daughter’s “shame” (in a right wing way) and lie about the situation…tantamount to fake dossiers and assassination plots I say!

]]>
By: Aaron Heath http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19848 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:03:23 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19848 Cover-up?

Are we discussing issues of legality or whether or not Americans will hold it against her? I think they’ll show some compassion considering the circumstances.

The real threat is that progressives appear to lack compassion. The war is in the centre – who are much more likely to vote on issues closer to the heart.

]]>
By: Cabalamat http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19835 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:29:44 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19835 I posted about this (the Sarah Palin rumour) at my place. If it’s true, the issue is not that her 16-year old daughter had a child – it’s that she covered it up in such a way.

I agree. I recently posted an article about when a poltician is entitled to privacy regarding their family. If Palin lied, then I don’t think she is entitled to privacy in this case.

]]>
By: Sunny Hundal http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19832 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:10:44 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19832 A cover-up is a cover-up, whether on the left or the right or anywhere else. She shouldn’t get an easier ride just because she’s a woman.

The nature of the accusations are only likely to endear her further with female voters (IMO).

If true, not to Republicans it won’t.

]]>
By: QuestionThat http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19830 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:20:05 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19830 I posted about this (the Sarah Palin rumour) at my place. If it’s true, the issue is not that her 16-year old daughter had a child – it’s that she covered it up in such a way.

]]>
By: Lee Griffin http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19825 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:44:41 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19825 Aye, it’s a pretty huge non starter when it comes to things…if it’s pressed then she’ll just talk about how mothers need to support their children through their mistakes, and to care for life rather than abandon it, etc, etc, usual “pro-life” droning… It’s not like there’s a clear win on that issue, why bother even raising it?

]]>
By: Aaron Heath http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19824 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:40:58 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19824 Also…

5th child, possibly being that of her 17yo daughter.

Sorry but that’s a family matter, and not something progressives should be gaining political capital from.

]]>
By: Aaron Heath http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/09/01/top-stories-and-blog-review-september-1st-2008/#comment-19823 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:19:25 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1195#comment-19823 Re. the Sarah Palin story.

The Dems ought to careful in pushing that ethics case. The nature of the accusations are only likely to endear her further with female voters (IMO).

It’s a non-starter, as Olbermann stated when the appointment was announced.

]]>