<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brown isn&#8217;t &#8216;bonkers&#8217; enough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/08/28/brown-isnt-bonkers-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/08/28/brown-isnt-bonkers-enough/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I don't get it &#124; hilpers</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/08/28/brown-isnt-bonkers-enough/#comment-31184</link>
		<dc:creator>I don't get it &#124; hilpers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1175#comment-31184</guid>
		<description>[...] Re: I don&#039;t get it     MadMazza wrote:  &gt; Mind you Golden Brown could be strangled quite easily! ;o) &gt; &quot; Brown isn&#039;t bonkers enough&quot;  http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/200...onkers-enough/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Re: I don&#8217;t get it     MadMazza wrote:  &gt; Mind you Golden Brown could be strangled quite easily! ;o) &gt; &quot; Brown isn&#8217;t bonkers enough&quot;  <a href="http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/200...onkers-enough/" rel="nofollow">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/200&#8230;onkers-enough/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjcjc</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/08/28/brown-isnt-bonkers-enough/#comment-19658</link>
		<dc:creator>cjcjc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1175#comment-19658</guid>
		<description>Nothing must be allowed to put Sunny&#039;s peerage in jeopardy! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing must be allowed to put Sunny&#8217;s peerage in jeopardy! <img src='http://liberalconspiracy.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny Hundal</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/08/28/brown-isnt-bonkers-enough/#comment-19624</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Hundal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1175#comment-19624</guid>
		<description>Sally - Well, Tim Montgomerie at ConservativeHome is already trying that. I&#039;m just &lt;i&gt;shocked&lt;/i&gt; that no one has called him bonkers yet.

&lt;i&gt;On a separate note, my comments on Sunny’s post yesterday were deleted&lt;/i&gt;

That was because it was related to some trolls, left and right wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sally &#8211; Well, Tim Montgomerie at ConservativeHome is already trying that. I&#8217;m just <i>shocked</i> that no one has called him bonkers yet.</p>
<p><i>On a separate note, my comments on Sunny’s post yesterday were deleted</i></p>
<p>That was because it was related to some trolls, left and right wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/08/28/brown-isnt-bonkers-enough/#comment-19623</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1175#comment-19623</guid>
		<description>I am not sure why a Liberal site would want to run right wing nut  talking points.  If you want to have a debate about whether The Labour Party should sack Brown and replace him with someone else,  fine, but ‘Browns is a loony ‘  thread does no one but the Tory party any good. 

How about a tread on Cameron saying that Bush is ‘intelligent. ‘  Now that is mad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure why a Liberal site would want to run right wing nut  talking points.  If you want to have a debate about whether The Labour Party should sack Brown and replace him with someone else,  fine, but ‘Browns is a loony ‘  thread does no one but the Tory party any good. </p>
<p>How about a tread on Cameron saying that Bush is ‘intelligent. ‘  Now that is mad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conchis</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/08/28/brown-isnt-bonkers-enough/#comment-19622</link>
		<dc:creator>conchis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=1175#comment-19622</guid>
		<description>You couldn&#039;t let it lie could you? Yesterday Sunny was pedaling the Brown is completely sane line - and today, Brown&#039;s a little bit bonkers but &#039;not bonkers enough&#039;. 

One could speculate that you are enjoying the debate about the PM&#039;s mental state as much as the Tory trolls. If you weren&#039;t, you would find something less salacious to write about. You defend his obvious behavioural anomolies while secretly enjoying the spectacle of Brown&#039;s self destruction. 

On a separate note, my comments on Sunny&#039;s post yesterday were deleted (I assume for in some way infringing your comments policy). However, you post starts with a rather infantile insult directed at Fawkes as &#039;some fat bloke&#039;. 

Deleting comments from Tory trolls and stifling debate is one thing but indulging in petty name calling and deleting comments from those that do likewise is the behaviour of vapid, vanity bloggers with sixth form intellect and little regard for fairness, journalistic integrity or liberal values.

Just my 2 cents - feel free to delete this if you disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You couldn&#8217;t let it lie could you? Yesterday Sunny was pedaling the Brown is completely sane line &#8211; and today, Brown&#8217;s a little bit bonkers but &#8216;not bonkers enough&#8217;. </p>
<p>One could speculate that you are enjoying the debate about the PM&#8217;s mental state as much as the Tory trolls. If you weren&#8217;t, you would find something less salacious to write about. You defend his obvious behavioural anomolies while secretly enjoying the spectacle of Brown&#8217;s self destruction. </p>
<p>On a separate note, my comments on Sunny&#8217;s post yesterday were deleted (I assume for in some way infringing your comments policy). However, you post starts with a rather infantile insult directed at Fawkes as &#8216;some fat bloke&#8217;. </p>
<p>Deleting comments from Tory trolls and stifling debate is one thing but indulging in petty name calling and deleting comments from those that do likewise is the behaviour of vapid, vanity bloggers with sixth form intellect and little regard for fairness, journalistic integrity or liberal values.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents &#8211; feel free to delete this if you disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

