Govt plans e-petition shakeup
People will be able to petition MPs online under new government plans. Ministers would be expected to reply to most of them, while some would be picked for debate by MPs in Westminster Hall or for select committee scrutiny.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Just out of curiosity, has any petition – to the PM say – been met with a response like:
“Wow, we never thought of that. That is brilliant. We’ll do that right away”
I suspect not.
I am more hopefully about this idea, though it seems to be an exercise at cutting off a tory bill that is coming up later this year at the pass, as it talks about actually utilising these petitions rather than treating them as a gimmicky PR exercise like the PM petitions site. The sole purpose of the PM petitions site is to let people vent and then for ministers to say why everyone is wrong. in the nicest possible way of course.
So long as you are allowed to petition other people’s MP’s. My Labour MP has voted against the HFE bill as well as gay rights legislation so what would be the point of sending him a petition to drop the two signature abortion clause to one when I already know his answer. If I was able to send it to someone else’s MP who was pro-choice I’d have much better luck.
BTW, I’ve signed numerous petitions on the PM’s site, they always find an excuse to say no.
I think as long as the idea is that you petition parliament, through a decent organising body, then those concerns wouldn’t matter so much Humanite. Currently the PM petitions are nothing more than the chance for government (therefore Labour) policy to be reitterated, but petitioning parliament could be much better if the people accepting them are transparent adjudicators of public will.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Why Quantitative Easing doesn’t make common sense
» Barclays was also bailed out – Diamond doesn’t deserve a bonus
» Ten myths about private rented housing
» Even on the left, morality has its limits
» The NHS bill could be a Waterloo moment for the govt
» Ken Livingstone and gay rights – it just isn’t an issue
» Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?
» New study shows a Robinhood tax would boost growth
» In defence of Sky News’ re-Tweeting ban
» Another reason to continue banker bashing
» An attack on the wind industry is an attack on UK jobs
|
5 Comments 15 Comments 17 Comments 26 Comments 42 Comments 21 Comments 13 Comments 49 Comments 11 Comments 78 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » BenSix posted on Fabians change policy on unpaid internships » Have Labour realised the election is more than three years away? | My Blog posted on Labour's wonks are becoming part of the problem » Owen Blacker posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Richard Blogger posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Daniel Henry posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » nonny mouse posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Socrates posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Bloody Yank posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Bloody Yank posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Robin Levett posted on An attack on the wind industry is an attack on UK jobs » kernowjim posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » ROFLMFAO posted on Fabians change policy on unpaid internships » Cherub posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » jojo posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction » Sun journos nicked in hack enquiry shocker « andrew henley posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction |








