Where’s our booty, huh?


by Aaron Murin-Heath    
June 21, 2008 at 12:08 pm

Welcome to a rare Saturday edition of the NetCast. The Gods have been kind (for once) and I have a few hours to spare. You go make a nice cup of tea and we’ll make a start. Okay? Right, off we go…

Robert Fox/CiF – For those who still deny that conquering Iraq was about oil, Fox points out that US and British oil companies are busy carving up the nation’s reserves. History suggests it may not be an easy ride, though.
OurKingdom – David Davis is discovering – somewhat predictably, institutional resistance to his stand. Particularly from the BBC.
BlairWatch – Why Ireland voted no on the EU treaty, and what the EU can do to be more representative of its people.
Mike Power – As always Mike Power brings you his picks from the weekend’s newspapers (Sat edition). You might need another cup of lovely warm tea around now. We’ll wait…
Scribo Ergo Sum – Johann, baby, we don’t care if you’re fat. R.E. Vamp on the idiosyncratic scribbles of Mr. Hari.
Clairwil – Is utterly exasperated by the events in Zimbabwe.
Freakonomics – Kicking off a debate on the economics of bottled water.


---------------------------
     


About the author
Aaron Murin-Heath is an occasional contributor. He is a writer based in Newark-on-Trent and Tallinn, Estonia. He is both socially and economically liberal. Aaron blogs at tygerland.net.
· Other posts by
Filed under
Uncategorized


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


“For those who still deny that conquering Iraq was about oil, Fox points out that US and British oil companies are busy carving up the nation’s reserves”

you missed out “French”, presumably because it defeats your point

Ah right Total got one. I really don’t see how one exception “defeats” my point. Usually the exception proves the point.

Are you going to make the case that it wasn’t about oil? (or is this just a hit and run comment?)

Hey, I’m not one for hit-and-run commenting. The Total point is that surely, given that France was famously opposed to the war, if this were a “reward the cronies, hand out the spoils” moment, then 1/4 of the spoils wouldn’t have been handed to a French company.

And no, the war wasn’t about oil: in the environment in 2002 where the war was planned, energy security was at best a niche concern and not one of the key worries of the US administration, and oil prices were low.

The war was partly an attempt by the guys who’d failed to persuade George H Bush to finish the invasion last time round to show they were right, partly an attempt to prop up the House of Saud vs Al Qaeda by allowing the Americans to move their Middle Eastern basis to Iraq, and partly a misguided attempt to spread democracy by force – think Cheney / Powell / Blair as examples of the three camps. If anyone (aside from the SWP) cared about Iraq’s oil output, it certainly wasn’t a decision-clincher.

Hi John,

I’ll take your points one-by-one ::

The Total point is that surely, given that France was famously opposed to the war, if this were a “reward the cronies, hand out the spoils” moment, then 1/4 of the spoils wouldn’t have been handed to a French company.

A lot has happened in the past few years. Sarkozy has made it clear, with his grave warnings to Iran and cosy meetings with Bush, that he is back in the fold. France has done much to repair its relations with Washington – you may consider Total’s contract a tummy tickler. Total is also one of the 6 daddies in the oil world – regardless of their Frenchness, they remain club members.

And no, the war wasn’t about oil: in the environment in 2002 where the war was planned, energy security was at best a niche concern and not one of the key worries of the US administration, and oil prices were low.

Ever since the OPEC crisis, Oil has remained a top 3 concern. Regardless of the oil price, America’s treasure has continued to flow into the Middle East and other oil-producing states. It has long-since been American policy to best massage the balance of payments. The Saudis played ball and set up development funds to use revenues to pay American corporations to build their infrastructure (as did the Shar’s Iran). The Saudi regime has received a “free-pass” from the Americans on various Human Rights issues, and the Saudi proclivity for financing radical Islamic schools in Pakistan, Indonesia, and beyond, has been ignored.

You may call the Iraq War(s) another Opium War (which was also directly a balance of payments war – British treasure lost through its addiction to Chinese tea). BTW, those who framed this war are not overly concerned with the nation’s balance of payments – at a national macro-economic level, but they sure want some of that money heading back to their own companies.

The war was partly an attempt by the guys who’d failed to persuade George H Bush to finish the invasion last time round to show they were right, partly an attempt to prop up the House of Saud vs Al Qaeda by allowing the Americans to move their Middle Eastern basis to Iraq, and partly a misguided attempt to spread democracy by force – think Cheney / Powell / Blair as examples of the three camps.

I’d agree with much of this. Certainly ego was a concern. I’d also add that the complex All-Star-father / loser-son relationship that exists between Bush 41 and 43 was a factor (going by interviews conducted with Bush when he was governor of Texas, he pin-pointed Iraq as his father’s albatross, one he would right).

I think Neo-conservative ideals were a useful crutch for Cheney and his corporate allies. Another useful tool in the narrative building, but dropped when it had served its use. So many neocon framers of the war saw they had been had, and fled.

But in the end, John, it’s always about oil. There is a very powerful, and vast industrial complex that controls much of America’s political class and its foreign policy. You know this, I’m sure. Oil represents the lubricant and the revenues for these companies. And I refer not just to those companies directly involved in pumping/refinery, I also refer to the massive engineering behemoths who have profited from contracts in oil-rich countries, underwritten by oil receipts. Companies very much intertwined with the Bush/Cheney set, and companies that have, are, and will continue to profit from this war.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs




Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




14 Comments



17 Comments



26 Comments



42 Comments



21 Comments



13 Comments



49 Comments



11 Comments



78 Comments



5 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» kernowjim posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» ROFLMFAO posted on Fabians change policy on unpaid internships

» Cherub posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» jojo posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction

» Sun journos nicked in hack enquiry shocker « andrew henley posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction

» Daniel Factor posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» UKFI Not FFP posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Spike1138 posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?

» Bren Cook posted on New study shows a Robinhood tax would boost growth

» Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Tricia McDaid posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction

» Edward Buxton posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction

» Rich posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction

» ll_bazwaldo posted on Paediatricians Assoc. members slams NHS bill