<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dorries facing Standards investigation &#8211; updated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/</link>
	<description>creating a new liberal-left force</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:52:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-75183</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-75183</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;New blog post: Dorries facing Standards investigation - updated http://tinyurl.com/5rddvr&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;topsy_trackback_links&quot;&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/libcon/status/1190144290&quot;&gt;Original tweet&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">New blog post: Dorries facing Standards investigation &#8211; updated <a href="http://tinyurl.com/5rddvr" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/5rddvr</a></span></p>
<div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/libcon/status/1190144290">Original tweet</a>]</div>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadine Dorries and Sunny Hundal's complaint &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-21440</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadine Dorries and Sunny Hundal's complaint &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-21440</guid>
		<description>[...] 8:26 pm A few days ago Iain Dale wrote: On 9 June, Sunny Hundal of Liberal Conspiracy made a complaint to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, accusing Tory MP Nadine Dorries of using public funds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8:26 pm A few days ago Iain Dale wrote: On 9 June, Sunny Hundal of Liberal Conspiracy made a complaint to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, accusing Tory MP Nadine Dorries of using public funds [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny Hundal</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12805</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Hundal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12805</guid>
		<description>I can verify that the above post is indeed by the real David Reeves, Labour PPC from that constituency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can verify that the above post is indeed by the real David Reeves, Labour PPC from that constituency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Reeves</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12765</link>
		<dc:creator>David Reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12765</guid>
		<description>Yes Nadine&#039;s attack on Monday was about me - I asked the Commissioner to investigate why her travel costs were upto 12 times more than those of neighbouring MPs. My complaint was rejected in part because the assumption I made was that her second home was in London - in fact the second home she claims from the taxpayer is her constituency home.

Of interest may be the way Nadine reacted to my complaint - instead of welcoming the verdict clearing she launched into an astonishing attack on me see link:

http://www.bedsonsunday.com/bedsonsunday-news/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=321169

Given the way she operates her blog as an attack site, maybe she was writing about her self when she said:

&quot;I find his attack cheap, time wasting, grubby and sad.&quot;

The article is worth a read, if not to judge what goes through her mind!

Thanks, David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Nadine&#8217;s attack on Monday was about me &#8211; I asked the Commissioner to investigate why her travel costs were upto 12 times more than those of neighbouring MPs. My complaint was rejected in part because the assumption I made was that her second home was in London &#8211; in fact the second home she claims from the taxpayer is her constituency home.</p>
<p>Of interest may be the way Nadine reacted to my complaint &#8211; instead of welcoming the verdict clearing she launched into an astonishing attack on me see link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bedsonsunday.com/bedsonsunday-news/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=321169" rel="nofollow">http://www.bedsonsunday.com/bedsonsunday-news/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=321169</a></p>
<p>Given the way she operates her blog as an attack site, maybe she was writing about her self when she said:</p>
<p>&#8220;I find his attack cheap, time wasting, grubby and sad.&#8221;</p>
<p>The article is worth a read, if not to judge what goes through her mind!</p>
<p>Thanks, David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unity</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12627</link>
		<dc:creator>Unity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12627</guid>
		<description>The local &#039;Labour spokeman&#039; may be David Reeves, who&#039;s the Labour PPC for the same constituency but if it isn&#039;t then its unlikely we&#039;ll find out as rejected complaints aren&#039;t generally reported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The local &#8216;Labour spokeman&#8217; may be David Reeves, who&#8217;s the Labour PPC for the same constituency but if it isn&#8217;t then its unlikely we&#8217;ll find out as rejected complaints aren&#8217;t generally reported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo K</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12620</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12620</guid>
		<description>Dorries&#039; blog from yesterday claims that her local &quot;Labour spokesman&quot; had made a complaint about her expenses prior to the abortion vote but that the Standards Commissioner had thrown that out. Any idea who she&#039;s talking about? 

In any case, it is fairly typical of her not to mention that another claim against her is being investigated, especially since the post is from just after midday, by which time she must have known.

Sordid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dorries&#8217; blog from yesterday claims that her local &#8220;Labour spokesman&#8221; had made a complaint about her expenses prior to the abortion vote but that the Standards Commissioner had thrown that out. Any idea who she&#8217;s talking about? </p>
<p>In any case, it is fairly typical of her not to mention that another claim against her is being investigated, especially since the post is from just after midday, by which time she must have known.</p>
<p>Sordid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cath Elliott</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12600</link>
		<dc:creator>Cath Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12600</guid>
		<description>Nice one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve B, UK</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12598</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve B, UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12598</guid>
		<description>Good. 

Now can we have her charged with poor &quot;Parliamentary Standards&quot; in her false, hysterical, idealogically-motivated campaign the claims of which must surely count as fraud?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. </p>
<p>Now can we have her charged with poor &#8220;Parliamentary Standards&#8221; in her false, hysterical, idealogically-motivated campaign the claims of which must surely count as fraud?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leon</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12597</link>
		<dc:creator>leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12597</guid>
		<description>Will be interesting to see how this one pans out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will be interesting to see how this one pans out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennie Rigg</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12586</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Rigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/06/09/dorries-facing-standards-investigation/#comment-12586</guid>
		<description>YAY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
