<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why don&#8217;t men wear skirts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 02:58:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colkitto</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-39333</link>
		<dc:creator>Colkitto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-39333</guid>
		<description>@ Charles:

&gt; Hey Colquitto—I made NO references to anything you said.

Sorry, I just assumed a post immediately following mine, addressing the same area of the subject as mine, and containing a near-quote from mine, was intended as a reply to mine. Was that so unreasonable? And what&#039;s with the &quot;Colquitto&quot; spelling? If it&#039;s meant to be an insult I don&#039;t get it.

Everything in your second post AFTER the above sentence, I absolutely agree with, and more power to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Charles:</p>
<p>&gt; Hey Colquitto—I made NO references to anything you said.</p>
<p>Sorry, I just assumed a post immediately following mine, addressing the same area of the subject as mine, and containing a near-quote from mine, was intended as a reply to mine. Was that so unreasonable? And what&#8217;s with the &#8220;Colquitto&#8221; spelling? If it&#8217;s meant to be an insult I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>Everything in your second post AFTER the above sentence, I absolutely agree with, and more power to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holly</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38912</link>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38912</guid>
		<description>aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawrence</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38828</link>
		<dc:creator>lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38828</guid>
		<description>Whatever floats your boat holly :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever floats your boat holly <img src='http://liberalconspiracy.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holly</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38821</link>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38821</guid>
		<description>i was serious about killing myself and why     do i continue wasting time on this website
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was serious about killing myself and why     do i continue wasting time on this website<br />
 <img src='http://liberalconspiracy.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38812</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38812</guid>
		<description>oh yeah... TY Lawrence. Good luck with your mission to make all people equal.
And if u care so much then why dont all of you get together... i mean y not it&#039;ll be easier for all of u to talk with each other... why does it matter so much anyway... just find out whos over 18 and what state their in and get a central meeting place... so simple... why do i bother...lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeah&#8230; TY Lawrence. Good luck with your mission to make all people equal.<br />
And if u care so much then why dont all of you get together&#8230; i mean y not it&#8217;ll be easier for all of u to talk with each other&#8230; why does it matter so much anyway&#8230; just find out whos over 18 and what state their in and get a central meeting place&#8230; so simple&#8230; why do i bother&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38807</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38807</guid>
		<description>I realize i was wrong. so i was completely off topic. Well, good riddance!  I told the truth for the first time in months and i was wrong to. now i feel like such an idiot...

and i dont care! i would not care if the entire world exploded!  I wouldnt care if you fell off a building!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

?WHATEVER?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize i was wrong. so i was completely off topic. Well, good riddance!  I told the truth for the first time in months and i was wrong to. now i feel like such an idiot&#8230;</p>
<p>and i dont care! i would not care if the entire world exploded!  I wouldnt care if you fell off a building!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>?WHATEVER?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawrence</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38495</link>
		<dc:creator>lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38495</guid>
		<description>Hi Holly,

I hope for your happiness that you are not serious. Stick around and discover that there are plenty of people that wouldnt treat you the way you describe.

And yes, I see no reason that some females cant be as good or better than her male colleagues at ANYTHING.

Since physical great strength is no longer needed or required as a matter of legislation in most roles thesedays, anyone should considered for any role as long they have the skills knowledge and ambition. 

But how do you feel about clothes holly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Holly,</p>
<p>I hope for your happiness that you are not serious. Stick around and discover that there are plenty of people that wouldnt treat you the way you describe.</p>
<p>And yes, I see no reason that some females cant be as good or better than her male colleagues at ANYTHING.</p>
<p>Since physical great strength is no longer needed or required as a matter of legislation in most roles thesedays, anyone should considered for any role as long they have the skills knowledge and ambition. </p>
<p>But how do you feel about clothes holly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38380</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38380</guid>
		<description>Holly. If you kill yourself you won&#039;t be able to help change the way things are. All of us here are sick of arbitrary gender roles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holly. If you kill yourself you won&#8217;t be able to help change the way things are. All of us here are sick of arbitrary gender roles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly Short</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38376</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Short</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-38376</guid>
		<description>That is like right on. Males think its degrading them and they think they&#039;re the better sex. And if they are it will not last long. The deceleration says that all people have the same rights, specifically to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That we are all equal. I notice how people treat me. Just because i&#039;m female doesnt mean i cant be as good or better that any boy. theyre all &quot;impress the girls... blah blah blah&quot; Why arent the girls trying to impress the guys the same way. 
It doesnt matter what they think because when we die we&#039;ll all be equal and we&#039;re all going to the same place. And im  going to find out where that is. Because im sick of pretending to be someone else and not getting any effect because im a girl. 

WELL I&#039;VE HAD IT! ~~~  im going to commit suicide and let me tell you by golly those rates for male vs female arent equal either
and could someone email me and tell me why i should wear pads or tampons please because i really dont see the point.
hollyfly13@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is like right on. Males think its degrading them and they think they&#8217;re the better sex. And if they are it will not last long. The deceleration says that all people have the same rights, specifically to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That we are all equal. I notice how people treat me. Just because i&#8217;m female doesnt mean i cant be as good or better that any boy. theyre all &#8220;impress the girls&#8230; blah blah blah&#8221; Why arent the girls trying to impress the guys the same way.<br />
It doesnt matter what they think because when we die we&#8217;ll all be equal and we&#8217;re all going to the same place. And im  going to find out where that is. Because im sick of pretending to be someone else and not getting any effect because im a girl. </p>
<p>WELL I&#8217;VE HAD IT! ~~~  im going to commit suicide and let me tell you by golly those rates for male vs female arent equal either<br />
and could someone email me and tell me why i should wear pads or tampons please because i really dont see the point.<br />
<a href="mailto:hollyfly13@gmail.com">hollyfly13@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36814</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36814</guid>
		<description>National dress takes many forms all across the world. It doesnt matter.

What does  matter is that certain kinds of clothing is considered taboo for men.

No kind of clothing, accessory, or makeup should be restricted on the basis of assigned sex at birth, or on gender identity.

It is a fact that in most societies in the world today, women are NOT subject to those retriictions.

Yes, there are trousers designed exclusively with a females shape in mind. I have no problem with that.

I am a slim male, and am fortunate that I am able to wear a large selection of womens clothing.

However, certain styles of dresses, are shorter in the torso, than is comfortable for me, and also does not give the appearance I would like to achieve.

A woman wouldnt wear a dress that did not fit her properly, so why should a man?

If we all wear oversized or baggy clothes, than fit is not an issue.

But take a tight dress or very fitted skirt for example.

A tight skirt or dress, reveals the bulge of ones penis and testicles, unless one is able to tuck it all away between ones legs. I prefer not to.

So SOME types of dresses and skirts would be best designed exclusively for men.

Many women if they choose to, can buy mens jeans for example and wear them just as they are. 

But women generally are far more concious of fit. Hence the industry caters for women by designing for womens shapes.

All that I would ask is that the clothing be designed for mens shape. 

Take blouses for example, where if I but a size that fits across my shoulders and chest, it is not a good fit elsewhere and often the sleeves and body are too short.

Certain styles of dresses are too big across my narrow hips, whilst fitting me in the chest.

So in that strict sense one can argue that there are clothes for men and clothes for women and thats ok.

Go into any levis store, and what do you see?

Mens levis and womens levis. Mens 501&#039;s and womens 501&#039;s.

I want to go into a shop and see Mens dresses skirts etc, and womens dresses and skirts etc. 

Some would be unifit and some specifically male fit and female fit.

Just as you get large and petite sizes for women, so you could have diferent shapes whilst preserving the style.

Perfume is for both, jewellery is for both makeup id for both, with perhaps the difference being in the chemicals used to suit male skin types.

Also some lingerie needs to be designed with the shape of the male in mind. I love fronch knickers, but as we all know there is no support for a male. Of course that support is not needed for a female. So we need French knickers for men and french knickers for women.

Everything I have read here and elswhere, has convinced me completely that the answer to the question  at the top of this discussion of &quot;Why don’t men wear skirts?&quot; can be answered as follows.

There is no JUSTIFIABLE reason why Men dont wear skirts.

But there are reasons. They are, outdated thinking, predjudice, misunderstanding, fear, embarassment, and I no doubt many others.

So perhaps the question we should all ask ourselves is how do we change it?

Individuals have little impact, perhaps we need a mans movement as voiciferous as the womens was in the 60&#039;s when they burned their bras to campaign for freedoms long denied to them by men.

However, I dont believe that it is only women that are the barrier to mens clothing freedom. Many men are equally or more opposed to men in skirts. We have to tackle their thinking too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National dress takes many forms all across the world. It doesnt matter.</p>
<p>What does  matter is that certain kinds of clothing is considered taboo for men.</p>
<p>No kind of clothing, accessory, or makeup should be restricted on the basis of assigned sex at birth, or on gender identity.</p>
<p>It is a fact that in most societies in the world today, women are NOT subject to those retriictions.</p>
<p>Yes, there are trousers designed exclusively with a females shape in mind. I have no problem with that.</p>
<p>I am a slim male, and am fortunate that I am able to wear a large selection of womens clothing.</p>
<p>However, certain styles of dresses, are shorter in the torso, than is comfortable for me, and also does not give the appearance I would like to achieve.</p>
<p>A woman wouldnt wear a dress that did not fit her properly, so why should a man?</p>
<p>If we all wear oversized or baggy clothes, than fit is not an issue.</p>
<p>But take a tight dress or very fitted skirt for example.</p>
<p>A tight skirt or dress, reveals the bulge of ones penis and testicles, unless one is able to tuck it all away between ones legs. I prefer not to.</p>
<p>So SOME types of dresses and skirts would be best designed exclusively for men.</p>
<p>Many women if they choose to, can buy mens jeans for example and wear them just as they are. </p>
<p>But women generally are far more concious of fit. Hence the industry caters for women by designing for womens shapes.</p>
<p>All that I would ask is that the clothing be designed for mens shape. </p>
<p>Take blouses for example, where if I but a size that fits across my shoulders and chest, it is not a good fit elsewhere and often the sleeves and body are too short.</p>
<p>Certain styles of dresses are too big across my narrow hips, whilst fitting me in the chest.</p>
<p>So in that strict sense one can argue that there are clothes for men and clothes for women and thats ok.</p>
<p>Go into any levis store, and what do you see?</p>
<p>Mens levis and womens levis. Mens 501&#8242;s and womens 501&#8242;s.</p>
<p>I want to go into a shop and see Mens dresses skirts etc, and womens dresses and skirts etc. </p>
<p>Some would be unifit and some specifically male fit and female fit.</p>
<p>Just as you get large and petite sizes for women, so you could have diferent shapes whilst preserving the style.</p>
<p>Perfume is for both, jewellery is for both makeup id for both, with perhaps the difference being in the chemicals used to suit male skin types.</p>
<p>Also some lingerie needs to be designed with the shape of the male in mind. I love fronch knickers, but as we all know there is no support for a male. Of course that support is not needed for a female. So we need French knickers for men and french knickers for women.</p>
<p>Everything I have read here and elswhere, has convinced me completely that the answer to the question  at the top of this discussion of &#8220;Why don’t men wear skirts?&#8221; can be answered as follows.</p>
<p>There is no JUSTIFIABLE reason why Men dont wear skirts.</p>
<p>But there are reasons. They are, outdated thinking, predjudice, misunderstanding, fear, embarassment, and I no doubt many others.</p>
<p>So perhaps the question we should all ask ourselves is how do we change it?</p>
<p>Individuals have little impact, perhaps we need a mans movement as voiciferous as the womens was in the 60&#8242;s when they burned their bras to campaign for freedoms long denied to them by men.</p>
<p>However, I dont believe that it is only women that are the barrier to mens clothing freedom. Many men are equally or more opposed to men in skirts. We have to tackle their thinking too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36454</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 02:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36454</guid>
		<description>While i agree that pants for women are designed for women, I ask the question why are they designed for women.
    This question is in lite of the fact that 10+ years ago several women were thrown in prison for wearing pants.
    Did katheryn hepburn were pants cut for a female?
    Did all those ladies that wore pants when their usbands were fighting in WWII?
    How about in the early 50s?
    Why were their pants not cut for women? Did it have something to do with no market yet for the female pants?
    The ladies started wearing men jeans, along with putting up with all the flack, stares, shock etc, that us men in the unbifardated rebellion put up.
     If you look world wide there are as many men that wear skirt like outfits as there are men that wear pants. ie the national Greek uniform, most of West and Southern Africa, Egypt, Malaysia Arab, just to name a few. Alot of the eastern men that were dress or skirt like clothing do for protection from the heat and the sun. 

I for one would like to see a unisex shirt/dress peice of clothing be created - oh wait isn&#039;t it called a Kurta?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While i agree that pants for women are designed for women, I ask the question why are they designed for women.<br />
    This question is in lite of the fact that 10+ years ago several women were thrown in prison for wearing pants.<br />
    Did katheryn hepburn were pants cut for a female?<br />
    Did all those ladies that wore pants when their usbands were fighting in WWII?<br />
    How about in the early 50s?<br />
    Why were their pants not cut for women? Did it have something to do with no market yet for the female pants?<br />
    The ladies started wearing men jeans, along with putting up with all the flack, stares, shock etc, that us men in the unbifardated rebellion put up.<br />
     If you look world wide there are as many men that wear skirt like outfits as there are men that wear pants. ie the national Greek uniform, most of West and Southern Africa, Egypt, Malaysia Arab, just to name a few. Alot of the eastern men that were dress or skirt like clothing do for protection from the heat and the sun. </p>
<p>I for one would like to see a unisex shirt/dress peice of clothing be created &#8211; oh wait isn&#8217;t it called a Kurta?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36448</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36448</guid>
		<description>Hey Colquitto---I made NO references to anything you said.  I was speaking generally in regard to those I&#039;ve encountered personally and on the web.  Many HAVE insisted a man can&#039;t wear any pants alternative other than a kilt.  I referred to the traditional kilt worn by clan groups.  Comment #81 by Dave---I see it the same way.  Those points are dead-on bullseye.

Main point I want to make about kilts---of any type, traditional or modified modern, is that someone wants us to be stuck with something than can be termed a kilt.  NO, I want a skirt.  What the Greeks wear is a skirt.  Kilts I&#039;m weary hearing about.  However, had they been pleated across the front also, my view would be far more positive.  These types tell me the flat front, plus pinning and buckling to the right, is what makes it &quot;male.&quot;  Come on, the location of a pleat has no correlation to any specific sexual anatomy.

I agree that any type of kilt IS the &quot;thin edge of the wedge,&quot; but the wedge is already &quot;IN&quot; so to speak, and frontiers need to be expanded.  Cheers to all kilt wearers.  Triple cheers to all SKIRT wearers.  We gotta throw off the restrictions on us, guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Colquitto&#8212;I made NO references to anything you said.  I was speaking generally in regard to those I&#8217;ve encountered personally and on the web.  Many HAVE insisted a man can&#8217;t wear any pants alternative other than a kilt.  I referred to the traditional kilt worn by clan groups.  Comment #81 by Dave&#8212;I see it the same way.  Those points are dead-on bullseye.</p>
<p>Main point I want to make about kilts&#8212;of any type, traditional or modified modern, is that someone wants us to be stuck with something than can be termed a kilt.  NO, I want a skirt.  What the Greeks wear is a skirt.  Kilts I&#8217;m weary hearing about.  However, had they been pleated across the front also, my view would be far more positive.  These types tell me the flat front, plus pinning and buckling to the right, is what makes it &#8220;male.&#8221;  Come on, the location of a pleat has no correlation to any specific sexual anatomy.</p>
<p>I agree that any type of kilt IS the &#8220;thin edge of the wedge,&#8221; but the wedge is already &#8220;IN&#8221; so to speak, and frontiers need to be expanded.  Cheers to all kilt wearers.  Triple cheers to all SKIRT wearers.  We gotta throw off the restrictions on us, guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36423</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36423</guid>
		<description>A kilt is a type of a skirt.  All garments from the waist down either have one leg opening or two leg openings.  Skirts or pants.  Simple.  Women can&#039;t even separate a skirt from pants in some circumstances.  A scooter skirt &amp; a skort are actually a type of pants since the right leg goes into a different opening than the left leg just as in any other type of pants.  You can call it a kilt if you like but it won&#039;t change anyone&#039;s perception that it isn&#039;t a skirt, at least out here in the western USA.  The designed for a man or designed for a woman are simply the result of defective thinking.  No skirt has gonads that I&#039;ve ever seen.  It&#039;s the waist size, the length to the hemline and the amount of flair or pleating that is significant.  In other words, it&#039;s a miniskirt, an A-line skirt, a pencil skirt, a tulip skirt, a pleated skirt, a bubble skirt, etc.  

If it fits, wear it.  Quit wasting your time trying to find testicles somewhere inside so that you can call it a kilt.  To everyone else it&#039;s still a skirt.  Like I said, if it fits, wear it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A kilt is a type of a skirt.  All garments from the waist down either have one leg opening or two leg openings.  Skirts or pants.  Simple.  Women can&#8217;t even separate a skirt from pants in some circumstances.  A scooter skirt &amp; a skort are actually a type of pants since the right leg goes into a different opening than the left leg just as in any other type of pants.  You can call it a kilt if you like but it won&#8217;t change anyone&#8217;s perception that it isn&#8217;t a skirt, at least out here in the western USA.  The designed for a man or designed for a woman are simply the result of defective thinking.  No skirt has gonads that I&#8217;ve ever seen.  It&#8217;s the waist size, the length to the hemline and the amount of flair or pleating that is significant.  In other words, it&#8217;s a miniskirt, an A-line skirt, a pencil skirt, a tulip skirt, a pleated skirt, a bubble skirt, etc.  </p>
<p>If it fits, wear it.  Quit wasting your time trying to find testicles somewhere inside so that you can call it a kilt.  To everyone else it&#8217;s still a skirt.  Like I said, if it fits, wear it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colkitto</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36415</link>
		<dc:creator>Colkitto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36415</guid>
		<description>Charles, just where did I say that kilts were the only form of skirts men should wear? I merely drew attention to the difference between a kilt - or, for that matter, any of the skirts you mention, which are also traditionally accepted as male dress - and a man wearing a skirt *specifically* designed for a woman. And there&#039;s nothing wrong with that either, but it IS a different case.

&gt; That Scots wear kilts is no matter on their part of interest in freedom of dress, except as it applies to their fixed, rigid, changeless, standardized hereditary costume.

Did you even read my post, or just see the word &quot;kilt&quot; and decide to reply to that? The diversification of kilt styles which I mentioned in my first paragraph pretty much disproves this point. The kilt today is anything but rigid and changeless. There are velvet kilts, PVC kilts, camouflage-pattern kilts, pinstripe kilts. I happen to prefer the old-fashioned version for myself, but that&#039;s just a matter of personal style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, just where did I say that kilts were the only form of skirts men should wear? I merely drew attention to the difference between a kilt &#8211; or, for that matter, any of the skirts you mention, which are also traditionally accepted as male dress &#8211; and a man wearing a skirt *specifically* designed for a woman. And there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that either, but it IS a different case.</p>
<p>&gt; That Scots wear kilts is no matter on their part of interest in freedom of dress, except as it applies to their fixed, rigid, changeless, standardized hereditary costume.</p>
<p>Did you even read my post, or just see the word &#8220;kilt&#8221; and decide to reply to that? The diversification of kilt styles which I mentioned in my first paragraph pretty much disproves this point. The kilt today is anything but rigid and changeless. There are velvet kilts, PVC kilts, camouflage-pattern kilts, pinstripe kilts. I happen to prefer the old-fashioned version for myself, but that&#8217;s just a matter of personal style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36389</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36389</guid>
		<description>We need to distance ourselves from the restrictive concept that a man can only wear a skirt as many say, &quot;that was designed or intended for a man,&quot; like a kilt.  I did a long study of the Balkan (Albanian/Greek) fustanella.  While it does the same thing as a kilt---it hangs from the waist and wraps the legs together as does any skirt---its appearance and design is very different from a kilt.  Considering other skirt styles still in use today in Tonga, Samoa, Fiji, Tahiti, Hawaii, Indonesia, and across the Arab world with robes and Dervish skirts---and all the many different skirts historically worn by men---there is NO basis to attempt to confine skirts worn by men into some narrow range.  Face it, compared to other skirt styles, kilts are passe.  What would explorers have said if someone had told them, &quot;Hey, go exploring this vast world all you want, just as long as you don&#039;t venture anywhere outside of Scotland.&quot;  That Scots wear kilts is no matter on their part of interest in freedom of dress, except as it applies to their fixed, rigid, changeless, standardized hereditary costume.  Tradition, nationalism, and family association is their motivation, not the broader motive of freedom of style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to distance ourselves from the restrictive concept that a man can only wear a skirt as many say, &#8220;that was designed or intended for a man,&#8221; like a kilt.  I did a long study of the Balkan (Albanian/Greek) fustanella.  While it does the same thing as a kilt&#8212;it hangs from the waist and wraps the legs together as does any skirt&#8212;its appearance and design is very different from a kilt.  Considering other skirt styles still in use today in Tonga, Samoa, Fiji, Tahiti, Hawaii, Indonesia, and across the Arab world with robes and Dervish skirts&#8212;and all the many different skirts historically worn by men&#8212;there is NO basis to attempt to confine skirts worn by men into some narrow range.  Face it, compared to other skirt styles, kilts are passe.  What would explorers have said if someone had told them, &#8220;Hey, go exploring this vast world all you want, just as long as you don&#8217;t venture anywhere outside of Scotland.&#8221;  That Scots wear kilts is no matter on their part of interest in freedom of dress, except as it applies to their fixed, rigid, changeless, standardized hereditary costume.  Tradition, nationalism, and family association is their motivation, not the broader motive of freedom of style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colkitto</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36387</link>
		<dc:creator>Colkitto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36387</guid>
		<description>An interesting point that hasn&#039;t been mentioned here is the recent wide diversification of kilts. Although I still wear a traditional one, you&#039;re no longer confined to tartan wool - there are all sorts of colours, patterns and materials out there. I&#039;ve even seen leather kilts.

The kilt, of course, is a garment designed for men, just as most women&#039;s trousers are designed for women. Wearing the opposite sex&#039;s clothes is a separate issue: it remains frowned upon for men, while women get away with it in a casual context (the question above about whether women would turn up to work in men&#039;s clothes missed the issue of *why* they might not: the fact is it simply wouldn&#039;t look smart enough - which is a lot less serious than the reaction a man would get for turning up to work in a dress).

I like the fact that my kilt remains out of the ordinary (I&#039;ve lived south of the Border for years now). In particular, I like the attention I get from women when wearing it. More men in skirts would, for me, mean competition!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting point that hasn&#8217;t been mentioned here is the recent wide diversification of kilts. Although I still wear a traditional one, you&#8217;re no longer confined to tartan wool &#8211; there are all sorts of colours, patterns and materials out there. I&#8217;ve even seen leather kilts.</p>
<p>The kilt, of course, is a garment designed for men, just as most women&#8217;s trousers are designed for women. Wearing the opposite sex&#8217;s clothes is a separate issue: it remains frowned upon for men, while women get away with it in a casual context (the question above about whether women would turn up to work in men&#8217;s clothes missed the issue of *why* they might not: the fact is it simply wouldn&#8217;t look smart enough &#8211; which is a lot less serious than the reaction a man would get for turning up to work in a dress).</p>
<p>I like the fact that my kilt remains out of the ordinary (I&#8217;ve lived south of the Border for years now). In particular, I like the attention I get from women when wearing it. More men in skirts would, for me, mean competition!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36382</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36382</guid>
		<description>a strange anology: the kitchen is in general considered the domain of women, but who are most of the time the real chef&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a strange anology: the kitchen is in general considered the domain of women, but who are most of the time the real chef&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36380</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36380</guid>
		<description>Maybe it is usefull to look for the history on the subject that people are not supposed to wear the attire of the other gender. This goes way back to the bible and may be considered as codification of existing law in 300 AD. See Deutrimonium. Reason was that croocks would dress as women and could not be found.  As people became less willing to go to church, which used to be the channel through which new laws were announced, a new channel for the thought had to be found, but the reason for the rule was lost underway. The new means for indicating that wearing clothing of the other gender is not done, was by means of psychology. In the late 19th century a psychiatrist (Binet) in Nice indicated that such an activity was to be considered as deviant whilst at that time in rural areas it was still common to see men in skirt-like apparel. Jung later propegated this thought further. Strangely enough, if you look nowadays at what is presented as men&#039;s fashion ( www.vogue.co.uk) and look at what the women are wearing in the streets, the question could be raised as to whom is wrong, aren&#039;t it the women who are actually using a double standard?

Looking further back, in the ancient greek, it was customary that for theater men wopuld dress fully as if the y would be women to act out the feminim parts. Look at the attire in the old Rome, is there much of a difference between the attire of men and women? 

Isn&#039;t the basic problem that a double standard is used and many lack the historical knowlegde?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it is usefull to look for the history on the subject that people are not supposed to wear the attire of the other gender. This goes way back to the bible and may be considered as codification of existing law in 300 AD. See Deutrimonium. Reason was that croocks would dress as women and could not be found.  As people became less willing to go to church, which used to be the channel through which new laws were announced, a new channel for the thought had to be found, but the reason for the rule was lost underway. The new means for indicating that wearing clothing of the other gender is not done, was by means of psychology. In the late 19th century a psychiatrist (Binet) in Nice indicated that such an activity was to be considered as deviant whilst at that time in rural areas it was still common to see men in skirt-like apparel. Jung later propegated this thought further. Strangely enough, if you look nowadays at what is presented as men&#8217;s fashion ( <a href="http://www.vogue.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.vogue.co.uk</a>) and look at what the women are wearing in the streets, the question could be raised as to whom is wrong, aren&#8217;t it the women who are actually using a double standard?</p>
<p>Looking further back, in the ancient greek, it was customary that for theater men wopuld dress fully as if the y would be women to act out the feminim parts. Look at the attire in the old Rome, is there much of a difference between the attire of men and women? </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the basic problem that a double standard is used and many lack the historical knowlegde?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36377</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36377</guid>
		<description>You Said, “None of us are helped in a positive way by those suffering from a mental illness known as gender dysphoria. These individuals hopefully may improve under the care of a psychiatrist. Such an individual may well be unable to relate to members of the opposite sex in a meaningful manner. For a man to wish to appear as a woman is about as inappropriate as a man who may wish to appear as a leopard or monkey. Insecurity.  

TYPO should read ” Amongst OTHER things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Said, “None of us are helped in a positive way by those suffering from a mental illness known as gender dysphoria. These individuals hopefully may improve under the care of a psychiatrist. Such an individual may well be unable to relate to members of the opposite sex in a meaningful manner. For a man to wish to appear as a woman is about as inappropriate as a man who may wish to appear as a leopard or monkey. Insecurity.  </p>
<p>TYPO should read ” Amongst OTHER things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36376</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36376</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,  (and anybody else who is less than complimentary to those that wish to be more like women)

With respect;

 You Said, &quot;None of us are helped in a positive way by those suffering from a mental illness known as gender dysphoria. These individuals hopefully may improve under the care of a psychiatrist. Such an individual may well be unable to relate to members of the opposite sex in a meaningful manner. For a man to wish to appear as a woman is about as inappropriate as a man who may wish to appear as a leopard or monkey. Insecurity. &quot; Amongst things.

Now the way you write sugeests that you are an educated man. So I am frankly amazed at your lack of awareness of gender. 

A man wishing to look like a woman is entirely different to a man wishing to look like a leopard, an entirely different species, now he might well be mentally ill, or maybe he just likes leopards. :)

Also I would like to know how you define 100 percent male. I would like to hear your definition.

Are you aware that there is no scientific test to define either male or female?

You are not male just because you were born with External genitalia, and not female because you  were not.

Are you aware that the head of your penis is in fact the same flesh that would be your clitoris had you been given eostrogen instead of testosterone as a fetus? And that with sufficient eostrogen you could develope perfectly normal breasts, and with progesterone even lactate?

Yor nipples are just the same as your wifes nipples, did you know that? They are simply reduntant on you as you are &quot;male&quot;.

Sorry you are wrong. Someone who feels themselves to be more like a female than their male body would suggest them to be, is not mentally ill. Differences in brain structure have now been identified in transgendered peoples, be they female to male or male to female.

Far from enough is understood about human gender, sexuality or sex(as in the assigning of sex as an identity).

We have limited words. Only male and female to describe infinitley more complex beings than those two words can begin to describe.

Transgender is also simply another word that attempts to encompass a group of people who feel different to the way that they are expected to behave according societies current narrow norms.

Its not a perfect word describing a fully understood subject.

The whole issue of clothing has become entwined in this narrow view of how we as humans are supposed to behave. 

Of course, there is NO DOUBT, that some people wishing to express themselves as a woman, will desire to wear a dress, makeup, lace etc, i.e all the things that are currently only acceptable for women. Such people wish to appear and feel as &quot;feminine&quot; as they can. 

Is it surprisng since only women are deemed suitable for such clothing, that someone who feels themselves to be a woman, should want to appear in so called womens clothes?

Would anybody here deny them that right?

Others, like yourself, simply like to wear the things you describe just because you like them.

And you should have that right.

I dont understand why you are so hostile to those of us that might feel less &quot;masculine&quot; than how you describe yourself to be.

Please also describe and define masciline behaviour.

Personally I like to ski (very fast, climb trees, and volcanoes, fight occasionally, drink beer, swear, fart, smell and arrange flowers, sew, sometimes cry watching an emotional scene in a film, like to wear earings, sweet smelling perfume (united colours of beniton HOT), wear a long dress, silk lacy underwear, ride motorbikes, ------------ well the list is endless.

Oh and by the way, I am not Homosexual, although I would not be ashamed if I was.

I have no idea of what is feminine and what is masculine. Its all just human behaviour to me. That may sound like a stupid comment, but the older I have got, the more I have experienced and experimented, the less i am able to say that I am exclusively masculine, or feminine for that matter.

But as regards transexuals, they definitley feel themselves to be minds occupying the wrong body, and medical science is rapidly discovering that they are NOT deluded.

Nature is not a perfect machine for the manufacture of humans. It doesn&#039;t work to a blueprint.

If on the other hand you believe in creation by god, then you would have to conclude that the god in question made a bit of a mess of it.

Without all the ridiculous rules and restrictions place on all of us, by the cultures and societies we live in, there would be much more likelihood that those born with minds that dont align with their bodies would be able to accept themselves by freedom of expression, since they would not be called mentally ill.

Coming back to clothes, if we treat them as a seperate issue, if that is indeed possible, surely it should simply be EVERY PERSONS right to wear anything they want from the vast array of clothing, accessories, perfumes etc that exist.

And if somebody wishes they had breast in order to fill the bra they like to wear, and stuffs them with false ones, and someone likes bum and hip pads to give the impression that they are shapelier than they really are ------ is that so very different to the guy that combes his hair over his bald spot to conceal the fact that he is loosing his hair?  Whos he trying to kid, and who am I to criticise him?

And should we win the right and freedom to wear whatever we wish at the expense of others rights, just because our feelings and reasons are not the same as theirs ?


This a great debate, lets keep it going and be more open minded. I am learning a lot from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,  (and anybody else who is less than complimentary to those that wish to be more like women)</p>
<p>With respect;</p>
<p> You Said, &#8220;None of us are helped in a positive way by those suffering from a mental illness known as gender dysphoria. These individuals hopefully may improve under the care of a psychiatrist. Such an individual may well be unable to relate to members of the opposite sex in a meaningful manner. For a man to wish to appear as a woman is about as inappropriate as a man who may wish to appear as a leopard or monkey. Insecurity. &#8221; Amongst things.</p>
<p>Now the way you write sugeests that you are an educated man. So I am frankly amazed at your lack of awareness of gender. </p>
<p>A man wishing to look like a woman is entirely different to a man wishing to look like a leopard, an entirely different species, now he might well be mentally ill, or maybe he just likes leopards. <img src='http://liberalconspiracy.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also I would like to know how you define 100 percent male. I would like to hear your definition.</p>
<p>Are you aware that there is no scientific test to define either male or female?</p>
<p>You are not male just because you were born with External genitalia, and not female because you  were not.</p>
<p>Are you aware that the head of your penis is in fact the same flesh that would be your clitoris had you been given eostrogen instead of testosterone as a fetus? And that with sufficient eostrogen you could develope perfectly normal breasts, and with progesterone even lactate?</p>
<p>Yor nipples are just the same as your wifes nipples, did you know that? They are simply reduntant on you as you are &#8220;male&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sorry you are wrong. Someone who feels themselves to be more like a female than their male body would suggest them to be, is not mentally ill. Differences in brain structure have now been identified in transgendered peoples, be they female to male or male to female.</p>
<p>Far from enough is understood about human gender, sexuality or sex(as in the assigning of sex as an identity).</p>
<p>We have limited words. Only male and female to describe infinitley more complex beings than those two words can begin to describe.</p>
<p>Transgender is also simply another word that attempts to encompass a group of people who feel different to the way that they are expected to behave according societies current narrow norms.</p>
<p>Its not a perfect word describing a fully understood subject.</p>
<p>The whole issue of clothing has become entwined in this narrow view of how we as humans are supposed to behave. </p>
<p>Of course, there is NO DOUBT, that some people wishing to express themselves as a woman, will desire to wear a dress, makeup, lace etc, i.e all the things that are currently only acceptable for women. Such people wish to appear and feel as &#8220;feminine&#8221; as they can. </p>
<p>Is it surprisng since only women are deemed suitable for such clothing, that someone who feels themselves to be a woman, should want to appear in so called womens clothes?</p>
<p>Would anybody here deny them that right?</p>
<p>Others, like yourself, simply like to wear the things you describe just because you like them.</p>
<p>And you should have that right.</p>
<p>I dont understand why you are so hostile to those of us that might feel less &#8220;masculine&#8221; than how you describe yourself to be.</p>
<p>Please also describe and define masciline behaviour.</p>
<p>Personally I like to ski (very fast, climb trees, and volcanoes, fight occasionally, drink beer, swear, fart, smell and arrange flowers, sew, sometimes cry watching an emotional scene in a film, like to wear earings, sweet smelling perfume (united colours of beniton HOT), wear a long dress, silk lacy underwear, ride motorbikes, &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; well the list is endless.</p>
<p>Oh and by the way, I am not Homosexual, although I would not be ashamed if I was.</p>
<p>I have no idea of what is feminine and what is masculine. Its all just human behaviour to me. That may sound like a stupid comment, but the older I have got, the more I have experienced and experimented, the less i am able to say that I am exclusively masculine, or feminine for that matter.</p>
<p>But as regards transexuals, they definitley feel themselves to be minds occupying the wrong body, and medical science is rapidly discovering that they are NOT deluded.</p>
<p>Nature is not a perfect machine for the manufacture of humans. It doesn&#8217;t work to a blueprint.</p>
<p>If on the other hand you believe in creation by god, then you would have to conclude that the god in question made a bit of a mess of it.</p>
<p>Without all the ridiculous rules and restrictions place on all of us, by the cultures and societies we live in, there would be much more likelihood that those born with minds that dont align with their bodies would be able to accept themselves by freedom of expression, since they would not be called mentally ill.</p>
<p>Coming back to clothes, if we treat them as a seperate issue, if that is indeed possible, surely it should simply be EVERY PERSONS right to wear anything they want from the vast array of clothing, accessories, perfumes etc that exist.</p>
<p>And if somebody wishes they had breast in order to fill the bra they like to wear, and stuffs them with false ones, and someone likes bum and hip pads to give the impression that they are shapelier than they really are &#8212;&#8212; is that so very different to the guy that combes his hair over his bald spot to conceal the fact that he is loosing his hair?  Whos he trying to kid, and who am I to criticise him?</p>
<p>And should we win the right and freedom to wear whatever we wish at the expense of others rights, just because our feelings and reasons are not the same as theirs ?</p>
<p>This a great debate, lets keep it going and be more open minded. I am learning a lot from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36362</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36362</guid>
		<description>http://www.szasz.com/ has commentary as to the flaws of the concept of mental illness, now often termed &quot;disorder.&quot;  Who is to say whose thinking is ordered, and whose is disordered?  Why, only the psychiatrist!  Talk about gaining ascendancy over all around you!  How often have you heard about any psychiatrist having any mental &quot;illness?&quot;  Nearly never.  And you usually won&#039;t.  When they alone are the &quot;qualified&quot; diagnosticians, they sure as hell aren&#039;t going to diagnose it in themselves, nor in any of their peers with whom they are on favorable terms.  Have any cardiologists died of heart disease?  Many.  Have any audiologists lost hearing?  Many.  Have any gerontologists aged?  All of them, other than those who had fatal accidents.  If a podiatrist drops an anvil on his foot, he has acquired a foot disorder.  How does a &quot;mental health professional&quot; acquire any mental &quot;illness?&quot;  THEY DON&#039;T.  This puts the lie to their highly parroted slogan, &quot;Mental illness is like any other illness.&quot;  No it is not---in real medicine, there are real diseases, such as hardening of the arteries.  In psychiatry it&#039;s just name calling as a strategy to STOP some nonconformist from being different.  They also function as hit men for the state, as in the former Soviet Russia to suppress political dissidents.  Psychiatry, being fraud,  is not and can never be medicine.  I see this board has a policy against racist comments.  So I point out that the American Psychiatric Association still maintains an image of Benjamin Rush, a Revolutionary wartime personality, considered the father of American psychiatry, in its journal and seal.  Rush believed that Blacks skin color was caused by &quot;disease.&quot;  They refuse to repudiate Benjamin Rush.  While the KKK gets attention as racists, the APA has been tragically overlooked.  UNTIL NOW.  And they foment worry over men in skirts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.szasz.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.szasz.com/</a> has commentary as to the flaws of the concept of mental illness, now often termed &#8220;disorder.&#8221;  Who is to say whose thinking is ordered, and whose is disordered?  Why, only the psychiatrist!  Talk about gaining ascendancy over all around you!  How often have you heard about any psychiatrist having any mental &#8220;illness?&#8221;  Nearly never.  And you usually won&#8217;t.  When they alone are the &#8220;qualified&#8221; diagnosticians, they sure as hell aren&#8217;t going to diagnose it in themselves, nor in any of their peers with whom they are on favorable terms.  Have any cardiologists died of heart disease?  Many.  Have any audiologists lost hearing?  Many.  Have any gerontologists aged?  All of them, other than those who had fatal accidents.  If a podiatrist drops an anvil on his foot, he has acquired a foot disorder.  How does a &#8220;mental health professional&#8221; acquire any mental &#8220;illness?&#8221;  THEY DON&#8217;T.  This puts the lie to their highly parroted slogan, &#8220;Mental illness is like any other illness.&#8221;  No it is not&#8212;in real medicine, there are real diseases, such as hardening of the arteries.  In psychiatry it&#8217;s just name calling as a strategy to STOP some nonconformist from being different.  They also function as hit men for the state, as in the former Soviet Russia to suppress political dissidents.  Psychiatry, being fraud,  is not and can never be medicine.  I see this board has a policy against racist comments.  So I point out that the American Psychiatric Association still maintains an image of Benjamin Rush, a Revolutionary wartime personality, considered the father of American psychiatry, in its journal and seal.  Rush believed that Blacks skin color was caused by &#8220;disease.&#8221;  They refuse to repudiate Benjamin Rush.  While the KKK gets attention as racists, the APA has been tragically overlooked.  UNTIL NOW.  And they foment worry over men in skirts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kinnon</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36361</link>
		<dc:creator>kinnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36361</guid>
		<description>The use of panties does not make one gay, or mad, in fact some clothing like satin, silk and lace are energetic, they give static and like acupuncture heal and promote better libido ie sex,  comfort and performance is important, helps the couple bond and solves infertility, female clothing is energy clothing , designed to maximize her energy and improve her aura, when used correctly can have the same effect on anyone with low self esteem, poor circulation and physic, long gowns , baby dolls and , camisoles can be healing, people with poor nerve muscle coordination are helped with static from satin or silk gowns, energy is improved with lace tops and hose. 
One lady garment that is a problem is the bra, damages muscles, blocks lymph’s and nerve signals, even ladies need to have a correct fitting and get out of them as soon as humanly possible, for most don’t use if at home. 
So clothing can be healing and a stress buster, does not make one gay, or changes your sexuality.  Make up for men and most women is a noo no as most are toxics, see ingredients on packs.
skirts Skirts and long gowns were originally associated with men, this allows the genitiallia to remain at a lower temperature, the use of lace and mesh panties is good for guys as it allows are flow around the testicles, this helps sperm production and libido, due to work and the evolution of the type of work med did they moved into pants and gender lines were blurred from roman times to today, in eastern culture and some American , the use of robes and skirts is seen as beneficial, look at birth rates. 
 Therefore men are better  in skirts and lace panties as it improves spermatogenisis and libido,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of panties does not make one gay, or mad, in fact some clothing like satin, silk and lace are energetic, they give static and like acupuncture heal and promote better libido ie sex,  comfort and performance is important, helps the couple bond and solves infertility, female clothing is energy clothing , designed to maximize her energy and improve her aura, when used correctly can have the same effect on anyone with low self esteem, poor circulation and physic, long gowns , baby dolls and , camisoles can be healing, people with poor nerve muscle coordination are helped with static from satin or silk gowns, energy is improved with lace tops and hose.<br />
One lady garment that is a problem is the bra, damages muscles, blocks lymph’s and nerve signals, even ladies need to have a correct fitting and get out of them as soon as humanly possible, for most don’t use if at home.<br />
So clothing can be healing and a stress buster, does not make one gay, or changes your sexuality.  Make up for men and most women is a noo no as most are toxics, see ingredients on packs.<br />
skirts Skirts and long gowns were originally associated with men, this allows the genitiallia to remain at a lower temperature, the use of lace and mesh panties is good for guys as it allows are flow around the testicles, this helps sperm production and libido, due to work and the evolution of the type of work med did they moved into pants and gender lines were blurred from roman times to today, in eastern culture and some American , the use of robes and skirts is seen as beneficial, look at birth rates.<br />
 Therefore men are better  in skirts and lace panties as it improves spermatogenisis and libido,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36353</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36353</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m honestly confused.  I have seldom, perhaps never, seen a woman present across the gender spectrum.  It may well be delusional to even imagine the presence of a gender spectrum.  Yes, mental illness does exist.  Being in denial is not a step down the road toward recovery any more so than an alcoholic who refuses to seek professional help as a result of his/her addiction.

I have seen women wear just about anything that you could imagine, and some I can&#039;t believe that I have seen.  All of these women that I have seen presented as a woman.  They didn&#039;t disguise their voice or attempt to hide their bust.  They were 100% female whether it was a grubby pair of overalls best suited for cleaning manure from a cow barn or a white lace dress with expensive jewelry.  No gender spectrum.  Just all woman.  

Now there are the mentally questionable guys with their feminine looking wigs, quivering voices, rags stuffed into a bra and even shoving a tampon up their rectum.  Makes one wish to vomit.  Please never confuse that with the desire to wear a variety of clothing as do most women while presenting always as a real 100% genuine female.  In the same manner I choose between a skirt or pants just as would a woman.  I&#039;m always at the 100% male mark on the gender spectrum regardless of my garment selections.  Being 100% male in my presentation has never stopped me from wearing a pink miniskirt with a white lace blouse.  I still talked &amp; acted like the real 100% male that I have always been &amp; always will be.  No tampon up my butt.  No trying to make like someone that I&#039;m not.  As I have stated before, looking like an escapee from a mental hospital certainly does noting for clothing freedom.  Women never looked like a nut case when they began to wear pants.  I have no issues with my wife wearing whatsoever she pleases or any of our daughters.  I would have a very serious issue if she were to attempt to represent herself as a man in public.  I&#039;m absolutely certain she would go ballistic if I were to attempt to pass as a woman in public.  I am always a man.  Clothing freedom does not require an expression or symptom of gender dysphobia.

Think about it.  Follow the ladies path to total clothing freedom without the psychological baggage.  Unless you want to replace the village idiot as being the joke of the town.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m honestly confused.  I have seldom, perhaps never, seen a woman present across the gender spectrum.  It may well be delusional to even imagine the presence of a gender spectrum.  Yes, mental illness does exist.  Being in denial is not a step down the road toward recovery any more so than an alcoholic who refuses to seek professional help as a result of his/her addiction.</p>
<p>I have seen women wear just about anything that you could imagine, and some I can&#8217;t believe that I have seen.  All of these women that I have seen presented as a woman.  They didn&#8217;t disguise their voice or attempt to hide their bust.  They were 100% female whether it was a grubby pair of overalls best suited for cleaning manure from a cow barn or a white lace dress with expensive jewelry.  No gender spectrum.  Just all woman.  </p>
<p>Now there are the mentally questionable guys with their feminine looking wigs, quivering voices, rags stuffed into a bra and even shoving a tampon up their rectum.  Makes one wish to vomit.  Please never confuse that with the desire to wear a variety of clothing as do most women while presenting always as a real 100% genuine female.  In the same manner I choose between a skirt or pants just as would a woman.  I&#8217;m always at the 100% male mark on the gender spectrum regardless of my garment selections.  Being 100% male in my presentation has never stopped me from wearing a pink miniskirt with a white lace blouse.  I still talked &amp; acted like the real 100% male that I have always been &amp; always will be.  No tampon up my butt.  No trying to make like someone that I&#8217;m not.  As I have stated before, looking like an escapee from a mental hospital certainly does noting for clothing freedom.  Women never looked like a nut case when they began to wear pants.  I have no issues with my wife wearing whatsoever she pleases or any of our daughters.  I would have a very serious issue if she were to attempt to represent herself as a man in public.  I&#8217;m absolutely certain she would go ballistic if I were to attempt to pass as a woman in public.  I am always a man.  Clothing freedom does not require an expression or symptom of gender dysphobia.</p>
<p>Think about it.  Follow the ladies path to total clothing freedom without the psychological baggage.  Unless you want to replace the village idiot as being the joke of the town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36330</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36330</guid>
		<description>Hi Charles,

I really appreciate your informative posts, and I don&#039;t want to by any means take away from the point you make. One minor comment though:

I think you&#039;re confusing &quot;transgendered&quot; with &quot;transexual&quot;. The distinction being the same as between one&#039;s &quot;sex&quot; versus one&#039;s &quot;gender&quot;. 

Transgendered individuals typically reject or seek to redefine &quot;male&quot; or &quot;female&quot; roles as imposed by society. Transgendered women for example could be those who prefer to present in attire and traits that society identifies as on the &quot;masculine&quot; side, but that doesn&#039;t necessarily mean they want male anatomy. Males are not afforded such freedom (as you point out.), and as soon as a man puts on a skirt he is deemed &quot;transgendered&quot; (which may be an appropriate definition since the man is defying traditional gender roles, but unfortunately has a negative connotation since the same restrictions aren&#039;t applied to women). Transexuals on the other hand are those who seek to change their physical sex and live entirely as the opposite sex.

Often these two groups are lumped into the same category, but they are actually quite different. Many women would fit under the category of &quot;transgendered&quot; in that they can present and act across a fairly wide gender spectrum whereas any man who would attempt the same would end up on that heap you talk about.

I would identify myself as transgendered. I have no interest in having a sex change, and am heterosexual. My interest in wearing a skirt lies in the fact that I consider myself somewhere towards the middle of the gender spectrum and wish as a man I could freely present as such - like many of my female friends can.

While many readers may not wish to be identified as &quot;transgendered&quot; because of the negative connotations imposed by society, they should know that they likely share many of the same philosophical ideas as transgendered people - and should consider TG folks their friends on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles,</p>
<p>I really appreciate your informative posts, and I don&#8217;t want to by any means take away from the point you make. One minor comment though:</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re confusing &#8220;transgendered&#8221; with &#8220;transexual&#8221;. The distinction being the same as between one&#8217;s &#8220;sex&#8221; versus one&#8217;s &#8220;gender&#8221;. </p>
<p>Transgendered individuals typically reject or seek to redefine &#8220;male&#8221; or &#8220;female&#8221; roles as imposed by society. Transgendered women for example could be those who prefer to present in attire and traits that society identifies as on the &#8220;masculine&#8221; side, but that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean they want male anatomy. Males are not afforded such freedom (as you point out.), and as soon as a man puts on a skirt he is deemed &#8220;transgendered&#8221; (which may be an appropriate definition since the man is defying traditional gender roles, but unfortunately has a negative connotation since the same restrictions aren&#8217;t applied to women). Transexuals on the other hand are those who seek to change their physical sex and live entirely as the opposite sex.</p>
<p>Often these two groups are lumped into the same category, but they are actually quite different. Many women would fit under the category of &#8220;transgendered&#8221; in that they can present and act across a fairly wide gender spectrum whereas any man who would attempt the same would end up on that heap you talk about.</p>
<p>I would identify myself as transgendered. I have no interest in having a sex change, and am heterosexual. My interest in wearing a skirt lies in the fact that I consider myself somewhere towards the middle of the gender spectrum and wish as a man I could freely present as such &#8211; like many of my female friends can.</p>
<p>While many readers may not wish to be identified as &#8220;transgendered&#8221; because of the negative connotations imposed by society, they should know that they likely share many of the same philosophical ideas as transgendered people &#8211; and should consider TG folks their friends on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36328</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/03/14/why-dont-men-wear-skirts/#comment-36328</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the typo where &quot;plaid and drab&quot; appeared.  It should read &quot;plain and drab.&quot;

Plaid is seldom drab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the typo where &#8220;plaid and drab&#8221; appeared.  It should read &#8220;plain and drab.&#8221;</p>
<p>Plaid is seldom drab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

